Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Francis Catholic Primary School

Inspected 16 Sept 2005 · published 18 Oct 2005 · URN 109239

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Sept 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Graeme Bassett RISP

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BS48 4PD

  • Name on report verified

    St Francis Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    109239

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellenteffectivelyeffectivepositivemake good progressoutstandingexceptionallysuccessfully
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysinadequateshortcomingsbelowdisruptiondeclinelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1480w+63
  • What needs to improve1548w+78

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,992
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%What needs to improve 51%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report St Francis Catholic Primary School

p.1

109239 Unique Reference Number North Somerset LEA 278160 Inspection number 15 September 2005 to 16 September 2005 Inspection dates Graeme Bassett RISP Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Station Road School address Primary Type of school Nailsea Voluntary aided School category Bristol BS48 4PD 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01275 855373 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01275 794476 Fax number 203 Number on roll Mr P Wildsmith Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Paul Stathers Headteacher 8 January 2001 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 278160 15 September 2005 - 4 to 11 16 September 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by Mr G Bassett.

p.3

Description of the school

St Francis Catholic Primary School, for children aged 4 to 11 years, is smaller than other schools with 206 pupils on roll. It serves a wide area around Nailsea and Clevedon because it is a Catholic school. Most of the children are white British. The local area is more advantaged than most nationally and the children enter the Reception class with broadly average attainment overall but there are some who are below average for their age. The proportion of pupils entitled to free school meals is well below the national average. There are fewer pupils with special educational needs than in most schools, although the proportion with statements is about average. There is a growing number of children who do not have English as their first language. Recently, as a mark of its success, the school gained an award as a ’Healthy School’, a ’Quality Standards’ (NAACE) award for information and communication technology (ICT) and

p.3

Description of the school

had its ’Investor in People’ award renewed.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, 15 September 2005 to 16 September 2005

p.3

Grade: 2

The overall effectiveness of St Francis Catholic Primary School is good. It provides a good standard of education. There is a caring Christian ethos and parents and pupils are very positive about the supportive family atmosphere that is fostered. The children in the reception class achieve well because of the good provision made for them from the time they start school. Standards at the end of Year 2 are above average and the pupils are achieving well. The school has been successful in maintaining good achievement in Years 1 and 2 since the last inspection. Standards at the end of Year 6 have been significantly higher than the national average in recent years and achievement has been good. However, the national test results for 2005 show that standards fell in mathematics and that some of the higher attaining pupils did not reach the predicted higher levels in English and science. It is clear that these results

p.4

Grade: 2

were unusual and that there was disruption to their learning as a result of staffing difficulties. This situation has been resolved well and standards in the current Year 6 are again well above average and the pupils are achieving well. The pupils with special educational needs make good progress because of careful planning for their needs and the effective support they receive from teachers and class assistants. The few pupils who do not have English as their first language achieve well once they have settled into the school. The system to assess and track pupils’ progress is good. However, the school does not give pupils enough opportunities to assess their own work so that they understand what they need to do next. The curriculum is good and the school is successfully linking subjects to help pupils in their learning. Out-of-school activities are good and are popular amongst the pupils. The provision for pupils’ personal development and well-being is good. Attendance

p.4

Grade: 2

is good. The excellent behaviour of the pupils stands out as one of the school’s main strengths. Pupils have a good understanding of the need for a healthy lifestyle and how to keep safe. The school has outstanding links with parents and this helps the pupils achieve well. The leadership, management and governance of the school are good. The school uses self-evaluation well and has sensible objectives for the future. However, in the past the school was not always quick enough to respond to emerging weaknesses. This was because of shortcomings in communication between subject leaders and the headteacher. The issues raised at the last inspection have been dealt with effectively and the school has proven good capacity for improvement. The school gives good value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Focus on: • Giving pupils more opportunities to self-assess their own work, so that they know the next steps in their learning 2 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, 15 September 2005 to 16 September 2005 • Finding effective procedures to ensure that key information gathered by subject leaders is communicated effectively to the headteacher for action.

p.4

Grade: 2

Children joining the reception class settle well to school routines and this ensures that their achievement is good, particularly in their personal development. Pupils start Year 1 with broadly average standards and they continue to make good progress. Standards are currently above average in Year 2 in reading, writing and mathematics and these pupils are achieving well. In the 2005 national tests every pupil reached the expected level in writing and mathematics and very nearly all did the same in reading. Many pupils achieved the higher Level 3 in these subjects. The school has held standards in Year 2 at an above, and sometimes well above, average level since it was last inspected. For most years recently, standards at the end of Year 6 have been significantly higher than the national average. The pupils have usually made good progress from the end of Year 2 to the end of Year 6. However, in 2005 the pupils’ performance in the national

p.5

Grade: 2

tests fell significantly in mathematics and did not meet the school’s target. Additionally, although nearly every pupil reached the level expected for their age, fewer pupils than the school predicted reached the higher levels in English and science. Currently, the standards in Year 6 are above average and the pupils are achieving well in the development of their basics skills and being aware of their well-being.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils’ behaviour in classes and at playtimes is excellent and their attendance is good. They are happy in school and willingly work hard in lessons. Pupils use up a lot of energy during playtimes as they play together harmoniously. They show full respect for each other. The parents’ view that ‘behaviour is exceptional’ is well founded. In lessons, the pupils have very positive attitudes to learning and are keen to answer questions and take part in discussions. They are polite to adults and other pupils. Pupils are given responsibilities at lunch times which they carry out with commitment. Older pupils look after the younger ones through the ‘Buddy’ system. The school has a strong sense of community and is successfully developing the pupils’ social skills. The pupils and parents are rightly proud of their school and all work hard to ensure that it is a pleasant and stimulating place to learn. Pupils are confident to discuss their ideas and opinions. The school council builds on

p.5

Grade: 2

these skills very successfully and, as a result, the pupils feel that their opinions are valued. They are particularly pleased when their suggestions have been adopted. The pupils’ social skills are good and they have a very strong sense of right and wrong. Spiritual development is good and the pupils participate fully in school assemblies through performing and singing. For example, in an assembly during the inspection, some pupils read aloud superbly a high quality poem “Winter” which they had written and others performed choral speaking with precision and enthusiasm. Pupils’ 3 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, 15 September 2005 to 16 September 2005 multicultural awareness is good and developed appropriately, which is an improvement since the previous inspection.

p.5

Grade: 2

The school has re-established the effective teaching in Year 6 that clearly led to the above average standards and good achievement in the past. Now, teaching in lessons is generally stimulating, pupils respond well and learning is brisk. Throughout the school the level of challenge is good, with activities that develop the pupils’ skills and knowledge systematically and hold their interest well. The teachers provide appropriately for the full range of pupils’ needs. Those needing extra help are taught well, usually with the effective support of classroom assistants. The teachers have good subject knowledge and they plan their lessons well to raise standards. The good quality of teaching ensures that the pupils achieve well and that their behaviour is outstanding. The teachers know the pupils very well and keep comprehensive and accurate records to show what each one has achieved. These are used well to build

p.6

Grade: 2

upon the pupils’ previous learning. However, the school does not do enough to enable the pupils to self-assess their work in order that they understand what they can do and what they need to do to improve.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school provides a well balanced curriculum which meets the needs of the pupils effectively. The good quality displays around the school celebrate pupils’ work in all subjects. Displays of artwork are particularly good. The work is adapted well to meet the needs of those pupils with special educational needs. The pupils who do not speak English as their first language make good progress and parents are very pleased with what the school provides. The school does not have specialist expertise to help pupils who have little or no English when they start school. However, it is successful in helping these pupils settle to their learning and to make good progress. The school has made good links between different subjects and pupils use their literacy and numeracy knowledge successfully in subjects such as science. This contributes well to the development of skills required for life and employment outside school. ICT

p.6

Grade: 2

is used well in other subjects and has a good impact upon the quality of teaching and learning through the effective use of interactive whiteboards. There is a comprehensive programme of personal, social and health education. Pupils in Year 6 have already established good links with their next school and they say they are well prepared for the future. The school provides a safe and secure environment in which all pupils can flourish. As a result, the pupils are confident, willing to take on responsibility and forthright in their views. The pupils speak highly of the good 4 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, 15 September 2005 to 16 September 2005 opportunities to take part in activities during lunchtime and after school. The initiative by the school to create activities on the school website for use at home is particularly rewarding.

p.6

Grade: 2

The care and welfare of pupils are very good, and health and safety are promoted strongly. Child protection arrangements are robust and regularly reviewed. The school promotes the pupils’ personal development very effectively through its Catholic traditions, and throughout the curriculum and the trusting relationships pupils develop with all staff. As a result, the pupils are confident and happy at school. The school has excellent links with parents and these have a very beneficial impact upon the positive attitudes of the pupils and their achievements.

p.7

Grade: 2

The leadership and management of the school are good. The headteacher, supported well by the deputy headteacher, has a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Their positive approaches to school management are central to school development. The headteacher has ensured that the school has dealt effectively with the issues raised at the last inspection and there is proven capacity for improvement in the future. With the active involvement of the whole staff and the governing body, the headteacher carries out an effective whole school self-evaluation and from this a clear direction for the future course of school development is established. Progress towards completion of the school goals is monitored regularly. The headteacher has developed good strategies to include subject leaders in school self-evaluation. They monitor their subjects effectively and evaluate the strengths

p.7

Grade: 2

and weaknesses of standards, achievement and pupils’ personal development accurately. However, the school does not always act promptly enough when weaknesses are identified because there are no agreed procedures for communicating information gathered by the subject leaders to the headteacher. For example, the decline in achievement last year, which was caused by the staffing difficulties in Year 6, was not remedied quickly enough. The school has learned from this experience and quickly sorted a similar problem that occurred in the Foundation Stage. The governing body are knowledgeable about the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They visit the school regularly and have good links with subject co-ordinators. Governors meet all the statutory requirements effectively and make frequent checks to ensure all pupils are well protected and safe. The school has a satisfactory number of knowledgeable and experienced staff. Staff and governors foster a caring

p.7

Grade: 2

environment, ensuring that all pupils have equal opportunities to achieve as well as they can. This is central to the school’s vision as a Catholic school. The school gives good value for money. 5 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, 15 September 2005 to 16 September 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, 15 September 2005 to 16 September 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 1 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

St Francis Catholic Primary School Station Road Nailsea North Somerset BS48 4PD 16th September 2005 Dear Pupils Thank you for welcoming us to your school. The inspectors had an enjoyable time with you, looking at your work and visiting you in your lessons. We enjoyed chatting with many of you during lunch times and in small groups. Thank you for telling us all about your school. What we liked most about St Francis Catholic Primary School: Your behaviour is excellent and you care well for each other Your teachers teach well and make your learning interesting You show that you are enjoying school and your attendance is good The work you do is good and you try hard to do your best Your headteacher leads the school well. What we have asked your headteacher and staff to do: Help you to record what you have learned and to enable you to list what you need to do next Improve the way that information is passed from your teachers to your headteacher so that

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

improvements to school are made more quickly. We hope that you can help your headteacher and teachers by telling them what you find easy and what is hard. Graeme Bassett Lead inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion