Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Simonside Primary School

Inspected 11 May 2006 · published 30 May 2006 · URN 108698

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Tom Grieveson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 May 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tom Grieveson

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    NE32 4AU

  • Name on report verified

    Simonside Primary School

  • URN verified

    108698

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelymake good progresspositiveenjoyexceptionallyimprovedgood progress
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatenot yetweakyet todeclinednot sufficientlyseriously

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1507w+61
  • What needs to improve1321w+42

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,791
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%What needs to improve 46%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Simonside Primary School

p.1

108698 Unique Reference Number South Tyneside LEA 278027 Inspection number 10 May 2006 to 11 May 2006 Inspection dates Mr Tom Grieveson HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Glasgow Road School address Primary Type of school Jarrow Community School category Tyne and Wear, NE32 4AU 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 0191 4898315 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0191 4838500 Fax number 240 Number on roll Mrs Leila Hassan Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Jim Purvis Headteacher 27 June 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 278027 10 May 2006 - 4 to 11 11 May 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Simonside Primary is an average-sized school situated in the Jarrow area of South Tyneside. The number of pupils attending the school has declined in recent years, reflecting the lower number of school aged pupils living in the immediate area. Almost three quarters of the pupils reside locally. Nine pupils in the school’s hearing impaired units travel from other parts of the local authority. A very high number of pupils at the school are entitled to free school meals. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is almost twice the national average. A small percentage of pupils come from minority ethnic families but none from homes where English is not the first language.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Simonside Primary School, 10 May 2006 to 11 May 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

Simonside Primary provides a satisfactory education with good provision for the personal development, well-being and care of its pupils. The school’s own evaluation accords closely with inspection findings. Most parents are pleased with the education provided by the school but a minority feel their views are not sufficiently considered. Overall, most pupils do well at this school. However, the rate of progress which pupils make varies between key stages. Most children enter the Reception class with low basic skills but through effective teaching the majority make good progress. At Key Stage 1 progress is satisfactory, but more able pupils do not perform as well as they should, mainly because expectations of what they can achieve are not always high enough. Progress at Key Stage 2 is now good and most 11 year olds achieve expected standards. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make satisfactory progress

p.4

Grade: 3

and pupils in the hearing impaired units make good progress. Pupils demonstrate positive attitudes and most enjoy their work and behave well. Pupils are not yet routinely involved in setting future learning targets or in assessing their progress, and this limits their understanding of how they can improve. However, the school is developing strategies to tackle this. The curriculum is satisfactory with a broad range of additional activities provided to enrich pupils’ experiences. Leadership and management are also satisfactory. The senior team have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and where improvement is required. Some essential areas requiring improvement have not yet been tackled with enough rigour. Nonetheless, the issues identified in the 2000 inspection report have been tackled effectively. The school has secure capacity for further improvement and provides satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Raise standards further at Key Stage 1 in reading, writing and mathematics. • Improve assessment and target-setting arrangements to fully involve pupils in the setting of targets and in reviewing their progress. • Ensure that important issues are tackled with greater speed and consistency.

p.4

Grade: 3

When children start school their literacy, numeracy and social skills are particularly underdeveloped. By the time pupils are 11 years of age they have made good progress and the majority have reached expected standards. Whilst the overall rate of progress is good, it varies between key stages. Children do well in the Foundation Stage. Regular and effective assessment ensures that staff know children’s learning needs in great detail and make effective provision for them. Consequently, the majority of children make good progress but most do not securely reach expected standards by the time they transfer to Year 1. Standards at Key Stage 1, although improving, remain below average in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils make satisfactory progress but as yet, not enough account is taken of the wide range of pupils’ needs when learning 2 Inspection Report: Simonside Primary School, 10 May 2006 to 11 May 2006

p.4

Grade: 3

is planned. In particular, some more able pupils are not doing as well as they could because expectations of what they can achieve are not high enough. Standards at Key Stage 2 have improved because effective action has been taken to improve teaching and learning in previously weak areas such as English. Expectations about what pupils can achieve are now appropriate and are securely reflected in teachers’ planning, their interaction with pupils in classrooms and in the work which they set. Pupils with learning difficulties/disabilities make satisfactory progress. Those pupils with hearing impairments make good progress because of the guidance and high quality support which they receive.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils’ personal development and well-being are good. Pupils say they enjoy coming to school and feel safe and secure. Older pupils appreciate the responsibilities which they have to demonstrate care for younger pupils and newcomers. All pupils feel valued and consider their views are respected by the staff. Pupils are proud of their school and talk enthusiastically about it to visitors. Pupils exercise healthy eating choices and significant numbers engage in sporting opportunities. Pupils contribute well to the community and give generously to charity fundraising events. School council members take their roles seriously and recognise their contributions are acted upon. Attendance is satisfactory and continues to improve despite the minority of families who take holidays during term time. Pupils’ social, moral, spiritual and cultural development is good. Their caring qualities are reflected in their attitudes towards others. Pupils

p.5

Grade: 2

demonstrate maturity when discussing moral issues in assemblies and during lessons and show consideration for the views of others. For example, when considering the effects of bombings on British and German cities during their study of the Second World War, pupils were able to give considered views about the impact on the lives of those affected. Their positive behaviour reflects a clear understanding of right and wrong.

p.5

Grade: 3

The quality of teaching and learning is mainly satisfactory but good in the Foundation Stage and parts of Key Stage 2. However, good teaching is not a regular enough feature of lessons to ensure that pupils’ progress is good throughout the school. The best lessons are characterised by effective planning from teachers who understand what pupils already know and can do and takes account of the varying range of abilities in the class. New tasks are carefully planned to challenge pupils and meet their needs. Teachers and other adults target their time effectively and support pupils well. A variety of teaching styles maintains pupils’ motivation and generates an excitement for learning. In these lessons pupils make good progress, enjoy their learning and demonstrate positive attitudes to their work. Teaching is less effective when teachers 3 Inspection Report: Simonside Primary School, 10 May 2006 to 11 May 2006

p.5

Grade: 3

do not use assessment information well enough as the basis for planning new learning. When this occurs, there is a tendency to underestimate what pupils are capable of and consequently, some tasks lack appropriate challenge.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory and meets all statutory requirements. Emphasis is given to the development of literacy and numeracy but the breadth of study is appropriate for all learners, including pupils from the hearing impaired units. These pupils work effectively alongside other pupils in mainstream classrooms because they are supported well by dedicated staff. A range of enrichment activities, including residential fieldwork and extensive musical opportunities, widens pupils’ experiences and impacts positively on their achievements and particularly their personal development. The school also makes effective use of outside agencies and external expertise in preparing pupils for life beyond school, such as the work with the Education and Business Partnership. Provision in the Foundation Stage is particularly well organised and contributes to the good progress which pupils make. Whilst individual subjects are delivered appropriately

p.6

Grade: 3

there is further scope to improve links between subjects at Key Stages 1 and 2.

p.6

Grade: 3

The care which pupils receive is good. All pupils, including the most vulnerable, are looked after by a dedicated staff team who exhibit a high degree of care and concern for their safety. Procedures for child protection are in place and appropriate safety checks are conducted on staff new to the school. Risk assessment is effectively managed. The guidance and support for learning which pupils receive are satisfactory. While the school has tracking procedures in place to monitor pupils’ progress, this information is not always used well by staff to plan future learning. Pupils are aware of their improvement targets but too many are unsure about what is required to achieve them. This occurs because pupils receive insufficient feedback about how to improve through marking or discussion with staff. Recent initiatives to develop procedures in this area are appropriate but are yet to have a measurable effect.

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory. The headteacher provides firm direction and has a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and where it must improve. The recently appointed deputy headteacher’s previous experience effectively complements the headteacher’s expertise and she is well placed to lead on specific initiatives such as assessment and target-setting. Together with the senior team, the school has effective capacity to secure further improvement. The school development plan accurately identifies priorities for improvement and acknowledges the progress made against some previously under- performing areas. 4 Inspection Report: Simonside Primary School, 10 May 2006 to 11 May 2006 However, the degree of urgency targeted towards securing improvements is variable. There have been notable successes; for example, in achieving higher standards at Key Stage 2 and providing better information and communication technology (ICT) provision

p.6

Grade: 3

for pupils, but more urgency is required if Key Stage 1 standards are to be improved further and target-setting procedures are to be fully effective throughout the school. Long serving governors demonstrate a high degree of commitment and loyalty to the school. They are increasingly involved in monitoring school activities and provide timely reports for the governing body to consider. This work is valuable and strengthens their evaluative role but collectively governors are yet to fully demonstrate that they hold the school sufficiently to account for its performance. Financial management is efficient and key spending decisions are based securely on a thorough appraisal of need. 5 Inspection Report: Simonside Primary School, 10 May 2006 to 11 May 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Simonside Primary School, 10 May 2006 to 11 May 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0207 421 6800 F 0207 421 6707 Ofsted helpline 08456 404045 The Pupils Simonside Primary School Glasgow Road Jarrow Tyne and Wear NE32 4AU 10 May 2006 Dear Pupils As you know Mr Shearsmith, Mrs Buller and I spent two days inspecting your school on 10 and 11 May 2006. The report has now been completed and I would like to tell you about what it contains. We were very impressed by the welcome which you gave us to your school. Thank you for that. Your school is a very welcoming place. You were very helpful in providing information which showed how pleased you are to attend Simonside Primary School and how much you enjoy your education. Your behaviour, and the hard work which you showed in lessons, was good. Well done, you are a credit to your school. Simonside Primary School provides you with a satisfactory education, but does particularly well in helping you develop your personal skills and takes great care to make sure you are safe and

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

looked after. Your headteacher, Mr Purvis, and his staff work extremely hard on your behalf. I know you appreciate their efforts. You know a great deal about keeping safe and being healthy. The fundraising you take part in to support worthy causes shows you are caring people who want to help others. You showed us how responsible you are through your good behaviour. Your school council does a very good job and the headteacher values what pupils have to say on your behalf. I should be grateful if you would thank your parents for all the very useful information which they provided. They clearly like your school and are happy with the education which it provides but some say they would like to be consulted more about changes which the school intends to make. We have asked the headteacher, governors and staff to concentrate on making three things even better and you might want to think about how you can help them.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

First, we think that some of you could achieve even higher standards.

p.11

Annex B

Second, we have asked the staff to involve you more in setting learning targets and helping you to understand better what you need to do to improve your learning further. Third, whilst many good things have been done to help your school improve, some things that need to be improved have not been tackled yet. We have asked the staff to concentrate on these areas much more. Thank you for making our visit to Simonside so enjoyable. Please accept my very best wishes for the future. Yours faithfully Tom Grieveson Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion