Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Bridgewater Primary School

Inspected 20 Jan 2006 · published 8 Feb 2006 · URN 108466

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Janet Bennett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Jan 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Bennett

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Delaval Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    108466

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectivelyexceptionallymake good progressrapid progressenjoyvery wellfeel safe
Criticismweaknessesbelowinadequatepoorat risktoo fewnot alwaystoo slow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1420w+56
  • What needs to improve1445w+49

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,827
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%What needs to improve 50%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Delaval Community Primary School

p.1

108466 Unique Reference Number Newcastle upon Tyne LEA 277979 Inspection number 19 January 2006 to 20 January 2006 Inspection dates Mrs Janet Bennett Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Axwell Park View School address Primary Type of school Scotswood Community School category Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear 3 to 11 Age range of pupils

p.1

0191 2745290 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0191 2753296 Fax number 166 Number on roll Mr Jim Snowden Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Sandra Marsden Headteacher 1 March 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 277979 19 January 2006 - 3 to 11 20 January 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two additional inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Delaval Community Primary School serves an area with high levels of deprivation. Most pupils are white British, but a small number are from other ethnic backgrounds and learn English as an additional language. Almost four fifths of pupils are eligible for free school meals. Attainment on entry to school is well below average, particularly in communication and language skills. Almost a quarter of the pupils have learning difficulties or disabilities and the school has an assessment unit catering for eight young children with communication difficulties. Good links exist with the local Surestart programme.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Delaval Community Primary School, 19 January 2006 to 20 January 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school judges its overall effectiveness to be good but inspectors found that it is satisfactory and improving. The school provides satisfactory value for money. Although standards are generally average, they are rising and the pupils’ achievement is good in English and satisfactory in mathematics. Standards in speaking and listening are below average because there are too few planned opportunities for pupils to develop their skills in lessons. The quality of teaching is satisfactory. Specialist teaching in Years 5 and 6 helps pupils make good progress in English and mathematics but elsewhere progress is uneven. Information from assessment is not always used sufficiently for planning lessons to build on prior learning. This is particularly so in Years 3 and 4. Pupils who have learning difficulties or disabilities, including those in the assessment unit, and those who learn English as an additional language receive the support they need and make satisfactory

p.4

Grade: 3

progress. The pupils’ personal development and well-being are good. Attendance levels are below average but the school adopts very good strategies to try to improve them. Pupils are well cared for and, as a result, they feel safe and happy in school, but they are not given enough guidance to show them how to improve their work. The curriculum is satisfactory. It is enriched by visits and after school clubs that contribute well to pupils’ enjoyment of school. Leadership and management are satisfactory. Monitoring by school leaders has recently been extended but the outcomes are not used well enough to ensure that pupils make smooth progress in their learning or to take decisive action to resolve identified weaknesses in the teaching. The quality of education for children in the Foundation Stage is good. The school has made satisfactory progress since the last inspection and is well placed to improve further.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Make better use of assessment information to plan lessons. • Give pupils a better understanding of their learning and what they need to do to improve their work. • Extend the opportunities for pupils to develop their speaking and listening skills. • Use information from monitoring to resolve weaknesses in the teaching.

p.4

Grade: 3

Standards on entry to nursery are well below average, particularly in communication, language and literacy. Pupils make good progress in the Foundation Stage but, by the end of the reception year, standards are below those expected nationally. Sound progress is made in Years 1 and 2, but by the end of Year 2 standards remain below those expected for pupils of this age. In Years 3 and 4 pupils make satisfactory progress 2 Inspection Report: Delaval Community Primary School, 19 January 2006 to 20 January 2006 but, in some lessons, learning does not build well on prior learning. However, rapid progress is made in Years 5 and 6 where the specialist teaching of literacy and numeracy has a positive impact on the pace of learning. As a result of this good teaching and the challenging targets that are set, the standards currently attained by pupils in Year 6 are broadly average and achievement is improving. Standards in English are

p.4

Grade: 3

consistently lower than they are in mathematics and science because few children attain the higher levels in this subject. However, achievement in English is good, given the children’s very low starting point on entry to school. Pupils who have learning difficulties or disabilities, including those in the assessment unit, and those who learn English as an additional language are effectively included in the life and work of the school. They make satisfactory progress and achieve as well as other pupils. The school is beginning to cater for pupils with particular gifts and talents and they achieve well in their particular area of expertise.

p.5

Grade: 2

The pupils’ personal development and well-being are good. All adults in the school work hard to raise pupils’ self-esteem, therefore talents and achievements in all areas are encouraged and celebrated. Pupils make a positive contribution to the school community through the school council, by helping younger pupils, or by being a ‘Buddy’ in the playground. The school is a happy and harmonious place where pupils say they feel safe. Behaviour in lessons and during play is good. Pupils are confident that any incidents of poor behaviour will be dealt with swiftly and sensitively. Pupils’ level of attendance is below average. This is a strong focus of school development, and very good strategies are working successfully to improve attendance and punctuality. The pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Pupils say they enjoy coming to school and they are also keen to gain praise and reward. They are proud of

p.5

Grade: 2

their school, and they take good care of it.

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory overall. Teaching is satisfactory in the assessment unit and consistently good in the Foundation Stage and in Years 5 and 6. In all lessons, relationships are positive because teachers know the pupils well and treat them respectfully. As a result, pupils behave well and work hard. The use of information and communication technology (ICT) contributes well to their enjoyment of learning, particularly in literacy and numeracy. Teaching assistants provide good support for pupils who have learning difficulties or disabilities and those who learn English as an additional language which enables them to take part successfully in lessons. In Years 5 and 6, the specialist teaching of literacy and numeracy results in pupils making rapid progress. This is because the teachers have good knowledge of the curriculum and 3 Inspection Report: Delaval Community Primary School, 19 January 2006 to 20 January 2006

p.5

Grade: 3

assessment is used well to ensure that activities are accurately matched lesson by lesson to pupils’ prior learning. This is not the case in all classes, particularly Years 3 and 4, and, as a result, the pace of learning in some lessons is too slow. Strategies for pupils to develop their speaking and listening skills are not well embedded in teaching and therefore too many opportunities for pupils to develop these skills are missed. Older pupils are beginning to evaluate their own work and to set themselves targets for improvement. Elsewhere in the school they are less clear about their next steps in learning and what they need to do to improve. The youngest pupils in school make good progress particularly in their personal, social and emotional development. This is because teachers support them well, helping them to grow in confidence and to develop the skills they need to work effectively with others.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory. All statutory subjects are taught and, in addition, French lessons have been recently introduced for pupils in Years 5 and 6. The curriculum does not include sufficient opportunities in different subjects to improve pupils’ speaking and listening. Opportunities for pupils’ personal, health, social and citizenship education are good. Physical development is given ample time in the curriculum and additional sport is provided through well attended out of school clubs. Healthy eating is a feature of the school’s daily routines. The curriculum is enriched by a range of educational visits, including residential stays, and the school makes visits to different places of worship which contribute well to pupils’ multi-cultural awareness. Improved resources for ICT have enhanced learning, and their use in lessons contributes well to pupils’ engagement. The school is keen to demonstrate that this is a school where every child

p.6

Grade: 3

matters and, as a result, pupils enjoy the opportunities that the school offers them.

p.6

Grade: 2

Standards of care are good. Child protection arrangements are thorough. Staff know the families and backgrounds of pupils very well, and there are good links to outside agencies, including ‘Surestart’, to ensure that pupils and their families receive appropriate help. Those pupils most at risk are identified early and supported well. Strategies that help pupils to understand their next steps in learning are underdeveloped. The school takes all reasonable steps to remove risks and conducts the required checks on staff appointments. All staff are trained in emergency first aid. Facilities such as the school’s breakfast club and strategies to try to promote good attendance contribute very well to pupils’ well-being and safety.

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management of the school and assessment unit are satisfactory. The headteacher and deputy headteacher work effectively together particularly to promote 4 Inspection Report: Delaval Community Primary School, 19 January 2006 to 20 January 2006 pupils’ personal development. Satisfactory action is currently being taken to raise standards in English and mathematics. This is having a positive impact on rates of progress, particularly in Years 5 and 6. A recently extended programme of monitoring is enabling all leaders to establish an accurate view of the quality of education. The leadership of mathematics and English has been further strengthened by working in partnership with external consultants. These developments contribute well to the school’s capacity to further improve. However, actions to address identified weaknesses in teaching are not decisive enough and, as a result pupils’ progress, particularly in

p.6

Grade: 3

Years 3 and 4, is not as good as it should be. Self-evaluation systems provide an accurate view of the school’s strengths and areas for development. They take full account of the views of pupils, and other stakeholders, and as a result the school is fully inclusive. There are plans to further improve services to families by bringing together local provision on the school site. Assessment systems are well established and information provides a clear picture of the standards pupils are attaining and the next steps they need to take in their learning. However, this valuable information is not used to best effect to improve pupils’ progress or to ensure that all teachers plan lessons which build successfully on prior learning. The governing body shares the school’s commitment to ensuring that all pupils achieve well. Its members have a growing understanding of the work of the school, and are well placed to develop further their strategic leadership over the coming year.

p.7

Grade: 3

5 Inspection Report: Delaval Community Primary School, 19 January 2006 to 20 January 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Delaval Community Primary School, 19 January 2006 to 20 January 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 4 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0207 421 6800 F 0207 421 6707 Ofsted helpline 08456 404045 Delaval Community Primary School Axwell Park View Scotswood Newcastle upon Tyne Tyne and Wear NE15 6NR 19 January 2006 Dear Children Thank you for your help in our recent inspection of your school. You were all very polite and made us feel very welcome. We think that all adults care for you well, and that this helps you to feel safe in school, and to behave well. You are encouraged to act responsibly, and you do this by working for the school council, or by taking care of other pupils who need help. You told us that you like to win the Attendance Cup and that this makes you try even harder to come to school regularly, and on time. Keep up the good work! We think that the ICT suite helps you to learn new things in an interesting way, and you told us that the whiteboards in classrooms help you to concentrate well in lessons. The after school

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

clubs and the fun games that some teachers play mean that you enjoy lessons. We found that in some classes the things that you were asked to do didn’t always help you to learn new things quickly, and teachers did not give you enough time to talk with other pupils about your learning. Because of this we have asked your headteacher and the people who work with her, to think about ways in which your lessons can be made even better. We also think that you will learn more quickly if teachers help you to understand what it is that you need to do to improve your work. We could see that you are proud of your school by the way that you look after it, and the way you try hard to win the praise of your teachers. We wish you well for the future and hope that you all achieve great things. Thank you again for your help, and also thank your parents for their views and opinions. Yours sincerely Janet Bennett Lead Inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion