Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Washingwell Community Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
22 Nov 2005
- Inspectorssingle source
Jane Randall
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
NE16 4RB
- Name on report verified
Washingwell Community Primary School
- URN verified
108356
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumGood
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.8
- The inspectors agree that the school is improving but the satisfactory rather than good progress prevents the team from agreeing with the school’s view that it is good. p.4
- You told us that you enjoyed school and feel safe and happy there. p.10
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Make better use of information from assessment to track pupils’ progress more closely. p.4
- Raise the level of challenge, expectations and the pace of learning, particularly for higher-attainers. p.4
- Achievement and standards are satisfactory. p.4
- At the end of Year 6 in 2005, results in English were higher than the targets, reflecting the focus on improvement in English over the previous year. p.4
- In mathematics and science there was a shortfall from the targets at both levels and particularly at Level 5. p.4
- The school has identified the need for more work on the problem solving and investigation aspects of these subjects. p.4
- The subject leaders are tackling these developments with enthusiasm and using external guidance and support well. p.4
- Levels of attainment on entry to school are very widespread but are generally average. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,382
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Washingwell Community Primary School
p.1
108356 Unique Reference Number Gateshead LEA 277955 Inspection number 21 November 2005 to 22 November 2005 Inspection dates Jane Randall Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Bucks Hill View, School address Primary Type of school Broom Lane, Community School category Whickham,, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE16 4RB 4 to 11 Age range of pupils
p.1
0191 4884400 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0191 4885287 Fax number 150 Number on roll Mr Chris Tuckey Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Ian Morton Headteacher 1 October 2000 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 277955 21 November 2005 - 4 to 11 22 November 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by two additional inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
The school serves a very mixed, but overall average, area. The percentage of pupils in receipt of free school meals is lower than the national average. The level of ability of pupils joining the school is generally around average. Numbers are falling because of changes in the area and fluctuate widely from year to year. Twenty-seven per cent of pupils have additional learning needs. Most pupils are white British. The school has low mobility rates. The school has attained the Activemark Gold. At the time of the inspection one teacher was in the first year of teaching and one teacher was temporary. The school was also undergoing extensive building works.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Washingwell Community Primary School, 21 November 2005 to 22 November 2005
p.3
Grade: 3
This is a satisfactory school with some good features. The inspectors agree that the school is improving but the satisfactory rather than good progress prevents the team from agreeing with the school’s view that it is good. Pupils start school with broadly average skills and overall attainment at the end of Year 6 is average, although standards fluctuate from year to year. The overall satisfactory progress results from insufficient challenge for, and expectations of, pupils’ learning. This is because teachers do not have enough information from the outcomes of assessment and the tracking of progress to set short-term targets for groups and individuals and to identify where not enough progress is being made. Although there are some good examples, the levels of challenge and the pace of learning are not yet consistently high enough to generate higher standards. The school has identified some initiatives to address this weakness and, in
p.4
Grade: 3
English, has demonstrated its success. The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage (Reception children) are satisfactory. The leadership of the school is satisfactory and has the capacity to make the necessary improvements. The good quality of pupils’ personal development, the care and guidance given to pupils and the curriculum also contribute towards this capacity. The school provides satisfactory value for money. not applicable
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Make better use of information from assessment to track pupils’ progress more closely. • Raise the level of challenge, expectations and the pace of learning, particularly for higher-attainers.
p.4
Grade: 3
Achievement and standards are satisfactory. Standards fluctuate from year to year. At the end of Year 6 in 2005, results in English were higher than the targets, reflecting the focus on improvement in English over the previous year. In mathematics and science there was a shortfall from the targets at both levels and particularly at Level 5. The school has identified the need for more work on the problem solving and investigation aspects of these subjects. The subject leaders are tackling these developments with enthusiasm and using external guidance and support well. Levels of attainment on entry to school are very widespread but are generally average. Achievement in the Foundation Stage is satisfactory and children attain the goals set for their attainment. Although pupils’ progress in Years 1 to 6 is satisfactory, higher-attaining pupils do not make enough progress in mathematics and science. Pupils with additional learning needs are identified early and they make progress in
p.4
Grade: 3
line with their peers. 2 Inspection Report: Washingwell Community Primary School, 21 November 2005 to 22 November 2005
p.4
Grade: 2
The pupils’ personal development is good. Their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good and the pupils have a strong sense of what is right and fair. An assembly and an excellent history lesson demonstrated pupils’ good response to spiritual issues. The school’s ethos is well reflected in the way in which pupils work cooperatively and in their good behaviour. Attendance is satisfactory. Pupils enjoy coming to school and participate well in lessons and other activities. They are prepared to persevere with independent tasks. Pupils understand the importance of a healthy life style and healthy eating. They follow safe practices in their conduct around the school. They make a contribution to their school through participating in the election and conduct of the school council, which has had an impact on the quality of school life, particularly playtimes. They contribute to life in a wider society and have good
p.5
Grade: 2
understanding of respect for all and enjoy their learning about other cultures. Pupils gain the skills that equip them for their future life, demonstrated particularly in the way in which they learn to discuss in groups.
p.5
Grade: 3
The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory and leads to satisfactory progress. The lessons observed included one which was good and another which was outstanding. These lessons were challenging and exciting. Overall, lessons are well planned but teachers do not have enough information from assessment and tracking of pupils’ progress towards their targets to enable them to make lessons demanding enough. Consequently, too little is sometimes expected of pupils, particularly those with the potential for high attainment. The value of the recent emphasis on improving speaking, listening and writing is clear in test results and in lessons. The school is now focusing on improvements in mathematics and science. Short-term targets are not used consistently in lessons to help pupils understand what they need to do to improve and increase the pace of learning. Marking gives too little indication to pupils as to how
p.5
Grade: 3
to improve their work. Pupils with additional learning needs are well supported in lessons. Good use is made of classroom assistants who provide valuable support for groups and individuals
p.5
Grade: 2
The curriculum is good. There are good opportunities for the development of personal, social and health education and a strong emphasis on teaching pupils to have respect for all. The school has a strong focus on the teaching of basic skills and has improved its curriculum for information and communication technology since the previous inspection. The recent focus on the development of speaking and listening skills helps 3 Inspection Report: Washingwell Community Primary School, 21 November 2005 to 22 November 2005 pupils to function well in groups. The curriculum for Foundation Stage pupils meets the requirements for this stage of learning despite the children being part of a mixed aged class with Year 1. Gifted and talented pupils are identified by the school but no specific provision is made except in music. For the size of the school there is a good range of sporting activities, including swimming, and clubs. The school has attained
p.5
Grade: 2
the Activemark Gold for physical activity. Of merit are the opportunities for older pupils to take part in outdoor and adventurous activities.
p.6
Grade: 2
The school provides good care for its pupils and takes appropriate steps to safeguard their welfare and safety. Parents support this view. Child protection procedures are securely in place. Pupils state that they feel safe and secure and know to whom they can turn if necessary. They trust their teachers. Bullying is not seen as a problem. The buddy system for the playground supports vulnerable or new pupils well. There are good procedures for identifying and meeting the needs of those pupils who find learning difficult and the school is very successful in its integration of pupils with a high level of additional learning needs. While pupils are taught well to be independent in their learning, too little is done to help them to evaluate their own progress towards targets. A system of targets relating to behaviour worked well in one class and behaviour and learning were improved because of this.
p.6
Grade: 3
Leadership and management are satisfactory. Parents indicate satisfaction with the school. Good initiatives have recently taken place to improve standards in English, Their demonstrable success is indicative of the school’s capacity to improve. The school gathers a great deal of assessment information about pupils. This is used well to identify pupils who need additional support and in to set targets in English for Years 2 and 6. At present, the information from assessment is not coordinated well enough to make sure that all pupils make good progress, to track their progress efficiently or to raise teachers’ expectations. Subject leaders are enthusiastic and well focused on raising standards but they do not have planned time to monitor teaching and learning in classrooms. The governors have a good relationship with the school and take an active interest. All statutory requirements have been met. A commendable initiative is for individual
p.6
Grade: 3
governors to take responsibility for liaison on each section of the new national initiative Every Child Matters. The school is aware of the need to get value for money. This is particularly successful in the support for pupils with additional learning needs and inclusion is a strength of the school. 4 Inspection Report: Washingwell Community Primary School, 21 November 2005 to 22 November 2005 .
p.6
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 5 Inspection Report: Washingwell Community Primary School, 21 November 2005 to 22 November 2005
p.7
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.8
learners?
NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.8
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.8
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.8
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.8
needs and interests of learners?
NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.8
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.8
and supporting all learners?
NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.9
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.9
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.9
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.9
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0207 421 6800 F 0207 421 6707 www.ofsted.gov.uk Washingwell Community Primary School, Bucks Hill View, Broom Lane, Whickham, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE16 4RB 23 November 2005 Dear Pupils, Following our visit to your school this week the inspectors would like to thank you for being so friendly, helpful and polite. We enjoyed our visit very much. We were impressed by your good behaviour and by the way you work well together in groups. You have learned new skills in speaking and listening in English and these are helping you to do better in your writing. You told us that you enjoyed school and feel safe and happy there. You show a good level of understanding about the need to respect all people regardless of where they come from or what they look like. To make your school better and to help you to do well in your tests your teachers are going to change the way that they set your targets. This is so that you know and understand what you
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
have to do to improve and what you should aim for. They are going to challenge you to work harder and aim higher. I am sure that you will be able to do this and enjoy it. Yours sincerely, Jane Randall (Lead Inspector) Annex B
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion