Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Hightown Junior Infant & Nursery School

Inspected 9 May 2006 · published 30 May 2006 · URN 107669

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 May 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Terry McDermott

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    WF15 8BL

  • Name on report verified

    Hightown First and Nursery School

  • URN verified

    107669

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingvery wellexceptionallyconsistentlyenjoyeffectivelygood progresspositive
Criticismweaknesseslacknot yetinadequateweaknessbelowinconsistencytoo slow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1300w+83
  • What needs to improve1514w+46

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,785
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%What needs to improve 53%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Hightown First and Nursery School

p.1

107669 Unique Reference Number Kirklees LEA 277802 Inspection number 8 May 2006 to 9 May 2006 Inspection dates Mr Terry McDermott CfBT Lead Inspector Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Hightown Road School address Primary Type of school Liversedge Community School category West Yorkshire WF15 8BL 3 to 9 Age range of pupils 01274 335240 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01274 335241 Fax number 174 Number on roll Mrs Karen Thomas Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Carolyn Prescott Headteacher 8 May 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 277802 8 May 2006 - 3 to 9 9 May 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Hightown is an average sized first school with a nursery. It serves a mixed catchment area with some social deprivation. The vast majority of pupils are of white British heritage. The percentages of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, and with statements of educational need, are broadly average. The school holds both the Investors in People and Investors in Pupils Awards.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Hightown First and Nursery School, 8 May 2006 to 9 May 2006

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school which gives good value for money. This agrees with the school's overall view of its performance. Achievement is good overall. Pupils start school with below average standards and they leave with standards that are broadly average. This represents good progress. Pupils achieve well in the Foundation Stage and in Key Stage 1. They achieve satisfactorily in Key Stage 2. Quality and standards in the Foundation Stage are consistently good, and improving. As a result, pupils make good progress. This good progress continues across Years 1 and 2 and ensures that they reach average standards by the end of Key Stage 1. However, progress in Key Stage 2 is no better than satisfactory and pupils leave the school at the end of Year 4 at average levels. Pupils' personal development and the quality of care, guidance and support provided for them are good. Pupils enjoy being in school and learning. They are polite, friendly,

p.4

Grade: 2

co-operative and exceptionally well behaved. The school cares conscientiously for them and prepares them well for the next stage of their education. Teaching and learning are good overall, with some outstanding examples in all key stages, but there is a lack of challenge in some of the teaching in Years 3 and 4, slowing pupils' progress. Progress is monitored throughout the school and the information gained is used to set learning targets for groups of pupils but not yet for individual children, thereby not providing them with the detail of what they need to do to make further progress. Inconsistency in the quality of some teachers' marking also prevents pupils on occasions from knowing precisely what they need to do to improve. The curriculum is good. It offers a very good range of opportunities for enriching and extending learning. Leadership and management are good. The well respected and quietly assertive

p.4

Grade: 2

headteacher has built an effective team that knows the school well. Issues identified for improvement at the last inspection have been addressed successfully. The school has clear capacity to improve further.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Provide greater challenge in all lessons in Years 3 and 4 and have a consistently high expectation of what pupils can achieve. • Set challenging individual learning targets for children and mark their work to a consistently good standard so that they know what they need to do to improve.

p.4

Grade: 2

The school was modest in its evaluation of its performance in this area because it placed too much emphasis on evaluating the average standards pupils reach rather than on their achievement. 2 Inspection Report: Hightown First and Nursery School, 8 May 2006 to 9 May 2006 Pupils achieve well in their time in the school. They enter the nursery with below average standards, particularly in communication and mathematical skills. Because provision in the Foundation Stage is good, pupils make good progress through Nursery and Reception Years and into Key Stage 1. This good progress is maintained in Years 1 and 2 and hence standards have been broadly average overall at the end of Key Stage 1 for the past four years, although standards fell in 2005. Particular characteristics of the 2005 Year 2 group of pupils account for standards in writing being lower than usual that year. These characteristics had a similar but smaller effect in mathematics.

p.4

Grade: 2

Both resulted in standards overall in 2005 being lower than usual. Progress in Key Stage 2 is satisfactory overall, but uneven, due to a lack of consistent challenge in some lessons. Standards remain broadly average when pupils leave the school at the end of Year 4. No group of pupils underachieves.

p.5

Grade: 2

The school evaluated pupils' personal development, including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development as outstanding. Inspectors judge it to be good. Pupils' response to their teachers and all the school offers is seen in their enjoyment of learning and exemplary behaviour. They like coming to school and are proud of their achievements. Many pupils offered positive comments such as, 'lessons are fun and exciting and things like 'Brain Gym' gets us in the right frame of mind for learning'. Pupils are polite and welcoming to visitors. Those spoken to during the inspection agreed that if problems arise they are quickly sorted out. Pupils are gaining a good understanding of the need for healthy lifestyles and eagerly participate in a variety of games during playtimes. Breakfast Club is very well attended and ensures pupils start the day with a good healthy breakfast. Pupils voice their opinions confidently

p.5

Grade: 2

through the school council and contribute ideas to improving the school. Involvement in a 'twinning project' with another school enables children to spend time with children from other ethnic backgrounds and learn about their cultures and religions. The development of good communication and social skills forms a secure base for pupils' future economic well-being. Attendance is satisfactory overall and the school works hard to improve this. In the Foundation Stage children learn to share, take turns and develop a good deal of independence. They show a high level of involvement and perseverance in their activities.

p.5

Grade: 2

The quality of teaching and learning is good overall. Outstanding teaching was also seen; however, in some lessons, particularly in Years 3 and 4, there were examples of satisfactory teaching. Classrooms are well organised and bright, stimulating learning environments; displays of pupil's work are vibrant and of high quality. The best teaching provides interesting activities, motivates pupils well and stimulates learning at a good 3 Inspection Report: Hightown First and Nursery School, 8 May 2006 to 9 May 2006 pace. In these lessons, work is well planned to meet individual learning needs and present a suitable level of challenge for pupils of all ability. Resources, including the interactive whiteboards are used well to gain pupils attention and help them to learn. Teaching assistants are used effectively to assist pupils in their learning. Behaviour is very well managed and teachers use praise to create a positive learning environment.

p.5

Grade: 2

In lessons where teaching is less effective, the pace of learning is too slow and pupils are insufficiently challenged in their learning and therefore do not progress as fast as they should. Assessment is good overall. However, not all teachers have the same high expectations of what the children should achieve and targets are not always challenging enough to raise achievement further and to enable teachers to check if progress is sufficient. Some marking is good and indicates precisely what pupils should do to improve their work but the practice is inconsistent throughout the school. In the Foundation Stage the quality of teaching and learning is consistently good with examples of outstanding practice. Lessons are varied and imaginative and as a result children's interest is high and they achieve well.

p.6

Grade: 2

The curriculum is good and meets statutory requirements. Links made between subjects are imaginative and bring a relevance and excitement to learning. Throughout the school the strong emphasis on role play helps pupils develop their speaking and listening skills and helps to fire their imaginations for writing. Pupils benefit from varied exciting opportunities planned to enrich their learning. They are able to take part in a good range of sporting and non-sporting activities, enjoy the expertise brought by visitors and take part in educational visits. Personal, social and health education has a high priority with good attention on keeping safe. For example, during the inspection pupils were made aware of the dangers of matches from a visiting fire fighter. The Foundation Stage provides a rich curriculum for the children both indoors and outdoors. Children enjoy learning through practical, stimulating activities that are

p.6

Grade: 2

carefully planned to meet individual learning needs, in particular to promote their communication skills and to develop independence.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school judges this area to be outstanding but inspectors find that it is good. The good level of support is reflected in pupils' good personal development. Pupils are confident and feel there is always someone they can turn to for help. One child said, 'I feel safe here'. Child protection procedures are in place and understood by staff. The school gives good attention to health and safety and to ensuring a calm learning environment. Pupils are encouraged to adopt healthy lifestyles; they have many opportunities to take part in physical activity and eat sensibly. 4 Inspection Report: Hightown First and Nursery School, 8 May 2006 to 9 May 2006 Although information is used well to provide extra support for groups of pupils making slower progress, the practice of setting challenging individual targets for pupils is not yet in place. Vulnerable pupils and those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities

p.6

Grade: 2

are very well supported. Their individual targets are clearly defined and help them to build effectively on their learning. Effective use is made of external agencies to ensure these pupils receive the help they need.

p.7

Grade: 2

The school is successful because the headteacher, through her good leadership, makes sure that everyone is involved in making the school a better place. Staff are given considerable levels of responsibility, to which they respond enthusiastically, leading to good levels of leadership in many areas of the school's work. However, the school has yet to tackle inconsistencies in the quality of teaching in Key Stage 2. There is a palpable team spirit in the school. The level of cooperation between staff, parents and governors is good, so that all are pulling in the same direction and working hard to improve the quality of education for pupils. The school has a good idea of its strengths and weaknesses through analysing, with increasing sophistication, the information it gathers on pupil performance, though it is occasionally over optimistic in measuring the quality of its own performance. However, this information is not yet used to full effect in setting precise and challenging

p.7

Grade: 2

learning targets for individual pupils. This would improve the whole school development planning process which currently lacks some sharpness. Weaknesses identified in the previous report have been tackled and are no longer issues for the school. Such improvements are the result of the strong focus placed on moving the school forward by the school's leaders and managers. Reading, for example, had been seen as a weakness in the past so the school drew up a plan to improve it and standards have now risen to just above average, despite the dip in 2005. The energy, knowledge and commitment of the open minded senior managers gives the school clear capacity to improve. Governance is good, and the dedicated and enthusiastic governors hold the school to account with increasing rigour. 5 Inspection Report: Hightown First and Nursery School, 8 May 2006 to 9 May 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Hightown First and Nursery School, 8 May 2006 to 9 May 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 1 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you very much for welcoming us to your school and for being kind, polite and so very well behaved. We enjoyed our visit and want to share with you what we thought about your school. Here are some of the good things we found about your school: - we are pleased that you are very proud of your school, behave extremely well and enjoy your lessons; we also liked the way you get on with each other and with your teachers and other adults - we were very impressed with the displays of your work on the walls, and with role play areas in every room which make your learning spaces so attractive - we think your headteacher and all the other adults really want to make the school even better; they are very dedicated, and you are lucky to have so many good teachers! We have asked your school to do two things to help you get even better: - we think your teachers should expect even more from some of you, particularly in Years 3

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

and 4 - we think your teachers should give you even more tips, written in your books, and should set you individual targets which tell you clearly what you should do to improve. We appreciated talking to you and enjoyed seeing you learn. We wish you well for the future.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion