Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School

Inspected 29 Sept 2005 · published 24 Jan 2006 · URN 106643

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Roger Hartley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Sept 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Roger Hartley

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    S63 9JY

  • Name on report verified

    Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    106643

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentSatisfactory
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−8Mixedmore positive than 33% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveenjoyexceptionallyconsistentlyeffectivelysecureoutstandingstrong
Criticismweaknessesinadequatenot yetpoornot sufficientlyunacceptablebelowslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1314w+37
  • What needs to improve1551w−40

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,832
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 44
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%What needs to improve 54%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School

p.1

106643 Unique Reference Number Barnsley LEA 277600 Inspection number 28 September 2005 to 29 September 2005 Inspection dates Mr Roger Hartley HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Lockwood Road School address Primary Type of school Goldthorpe Voluntary aided School category Rotherham, South Yorkshire S63 9JY 3 to 11 Age range of pupils

p.1

01709 892385 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01709 888168 Fax number 186 Number on roll Mr G Goddard Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Miss M Curran Headteacher 15 November 1999 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 277600 28 September 2005 - 3 to 11 29 September 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and one additional inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School is situated in the large ex-mining village of Goldthorpe, in South Yorkshire. Of the 175 pupils, 39 are in the Nursery class. Almost all of the pupils come from white, British backgrounds and none of the remainder speak English as an additional language. Eleven per cent of pupils are entitled to free meals, and there are 31 pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. The majority of the pupils come from long established families in this closely-knit community.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School, 28 September 2005 to 29 September 2005

p.3

Grade: 4

In accordance with Section 13(3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing and governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. The inspectors judge that Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School is not yet an effective school, although the school disagrees. The children receive a satisfactory start to their education in the Foundation Stage. Elsewhere, however, standards have not been consistently maintained and, overall, are below average. They are also below what they could be, given pupils' capabilities when they begin school. Too many pupils make slow progress in their lessons. The headteacher, appointed two years ago, inherited a considerable legacy of long-standing major weaknesses. She has identified correctly

p.4

Grade: 4

what needed to be done, drawn up an agenda for improvement, and made a determined start in bringing about change, but the work has been hampered by constant staffing difficulties over the past two years. The teaching is variable, with some effective practice, but also pockets where improvement is required. The curriculum is not yet sufficiently broad or balanced and despite recent initiatives, the work is not sufficiently matched to pupils' learning needs, especially the more able. The pupils' personal development is soundly based. They feel safe and secure, show positive attitudes towards the school and enjoy their lessons. Nevertheless, the range of improvements needed is extensive and it is the opinion of inspectors that the school does not have the capacity on its own to bring about improvement.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Improve standards in all subjects, especially English, mathematics and information and communication technology (ICT). • Accelerate pupils' progress in learning throughout the school by improving the match of work to pupils' needs, especially the more able, and establishing a broad and balanced curriculum which meets requirements. • Raise the quality of teaching to a consistently good standard through rigorous monitoring and self-evaluation. • Establish the roles and responsibilities of senior teachers and subject leaders.

p.4

Grade: 4

Although pupils make a good start at school, their progress is subsequently poor, and pupils do not achieve sufficiently well. When pupils enter the Nursery, levels of attainment are broadly in line with expectations for their age. They make steady progress and most reach their early learning goals by the end of the Foundation Stage. 2 Inspection Report: Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School, 28 September 2005 to 29 September 2005 However, progress is not sustained throughout Key Stage 1, and the 2005 national test data declined in reading, writing and mathematics, in spite of more promising results in 2004. There is a similar picture at the end of Year 6. Despite improvements in English, mathematics and science in 2004, attainment overall remains below national averages and the targets for higher attaining pupils in English and mathematics have not been met, although those for the higher levels in science were exceeded. Consequently, the

p.4

Grade: 4

inspection team agrees with the school's self-evaluation that, in a number of key respects, standards and progress are inadequate. The school has been through a very difficult period which has affected standards and achievement throughout the school. Since her appointment, the headteacher has introduced a revised and more cohesive set of curriculum guidance for teachers, and a promising system for tracking pupils' progress and target setting. However, relatively stable teaching has only been achieved in the current term. This follows many changes in the recent past, and a significant amount of ineffective teaching. As a result, the impact of the measures on pupils' learning has been slight and the progress made by pupils, especially the more able, remains slow.

p.5

Grade: 3

The inspection confirms the school's judgement that provision for pupils' personal development and their well-being is satisfactory. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is fostered through the school's strong Christian ethos which is rooted in its links with the parish. The pupils learn the difference between right and wrong, and they consider the consequences of their own actions on others. The curriculum promotes an awareness of other faiths and cultures, and encourages the pupils to reflect on the impact of art, music and literature through inviting storytellers, artists and musicians to work in the school. Children have positive attitudes towards school and enjoy lessons, although some would prefer more practical work in lessons. All the pupils agree that they receive fair treatment, and develop trusting relationships with adults who work in school. During the inspection, the children's behaviour was almost always good, and steps have been

p.5

Grade: 3

taken to eliminate the few pockets of unacceptable behaviour identified by the school. The work of the learning mentor is having a positive impact both on behaviour and attitudes. All the children feel they are well cared for and protected in the school. They receive good support from their friends and all the adults in the school. They learn about the hazards of drugs and smoking, receive sex education in Year 6, and are given clear guidance about personal safety. The school has raised the profile of physical activity in the curriculum by enlisting the help of Barnsley soccer and rugby clubs, and establishing links with a local sports college. The school is keen to achieve the Healthy Schools Award and there are healthy choices at lunch and fresh fruit provided for 3 Inspection Report: Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School, 28 September 2005 to 29 September 2005 snacks. The newly formed school council gives pupils a voice in decision making and

p.5

Grade: 3

provides opportunities to learn essential communication skills.

p.6

Grade: 4

The inspection team agrees with the school's evaluation that there are variations in the quality of teaching. The teaching is inconsistent; some of it is enthusiastic and the pupils are motivated to learn, but some misses the mark because the work lacks challenge. The wide range of abilities, especially in the mixed age classes, present particular challenges for the teachers who until recently could not distinguish between knowing what the pupils can and cannot do, so that often the work set has been too difficult or too easy. As a consequence, the more able pupils throughout the school have not been fully stretched. Nevertheless, there are good features on which to build. In the best examples, teachers involved the pupils in the cut and thrust of the lesson, provided opportunities for first-hand practical experiences, and made good use of resources. However, the school has not yet been able to achieve consistently good teaching due to a combination of

p.6

Grade: 4

indifferent planning, inaccurate checking of pupils' progress, and a constant turnover of staff; over half the teachers have left in each of the last two years.

p.6

Grade: 4

The school correctly identifies stable staffing as a prerequisite for the pupils to make progress towards a broad and balanced curriculum. Currently, there are important gaps in what is taught and how it is delivered; for example, the school acknowledges that the provision for ICT is poor and does not appear on over half the class timetables. The curriculum policies and schemes of work have recently been reviewed, but they have yet to have a clear and purposeful effect on the planned work, especially for the more able. There are inconsistencies in how subjects are taught; for example, although the school employs several schemes of work to teach mathematics, there is no agreement about how they should be used. They are not always used to good effect; as a consequence, a teacher may prefer to use one scheme exclusively, while others are more selective, dipping into several according to their needs.

p.6

Grade: 3

The pupils are well cared for and the school provides a safe environment in which they feel secure. There is a growing range of sporting and cultural activities to supplement the National Curriculum, and the school encourages the pupils to adopt healthy lifestyles. The provision for different groups of pupils is variable. The school has recently reviewed its provision for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities 4 Inspection Report: Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School, 28 September 2005 to 29 September 2005 and trained teaching assistants provide a variety of support both in and out of the classroom. The arrangements work well and the pupils make satisfactory progress and enjoy their work. More able pupils fare less well, because the work often fails to challenge them. Group targets have been set based on recent assessment data; the next steps will be to establish individual targets for the pupils.

p.6

Grade: 4

The inspectors recognise the considerable difficulties experienced by the headteacher who, over the past two years, has been preoccupied with unforeseen staffing difficulties which have fragmented the agenda for improvement. The difficulties have meant that only in the past few months has the headteacher been able to introduce systems to improve tracking pupils' progress, and begin tackling the major weaknesses in the curriculum which had built up before her appointment. The school has received support from the local Education Action Zone and the local authority, but it has not been sufficient to bring about the required improvements. Against this background, the headteacher has given firm leadership; the priorities are clear. The pace of change has been well judged and the staff given good support. However, the impact of the measures on pupils' achievement and progress is not yet consistent and has not ensured

p.7

Grade: 4

that all pupils make adequate progress throughout their time at the school. The management of change is proving challenging. Many of the initiatives are complex and require careful coordination. The staff are relatively new to the school and currently their individual responsibilities are not sufficiently defined, especially the roles of the senior teachers. This is placing a heavy burden on the headteacher who has not been able to check the teaching and learning with sufficient rigour, establish the specific needs of individual teachers, or to monitor the introduction of the new initiatives. The governors are taking an increasing part in monitoring the school improvement plan and know the school's strengths and weaknesses. However, they do not have any ways of measuring value for money expended; for example, the impact of computers on the pupils' learning. The school has received some support from consultants, but

p.7

Grade: 4

overall the school does not have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement, without extensive support. 5 Inspection Report: Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School, 28 September 2005 to 29 September 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School, 28 September 2005 to 29 September 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA No The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 4 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 3 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 3 How well learners enjoy their education NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 4 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 4 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Mr Johnson and I would like to say how much we enjoyed spending two days in your school. Thank you for being so polite and helping us. We spent a lot of time finding out how well you are learning by watching you work in some of the lessons and talking to Miss Curran and your teachers. At the end of the inspection we talked to Miss Curran and Miss Kilroy about what we had found out. This is what we said. We think you are well-behaved, almost all of the time! The boys and girls in the Nursery class work hard, share things and take turns. Older children act responsibly, taking care of books and equipment. You told us that most of you enjoy your lessons and feel that the teachers are interested in you. Nearly all of you work hard, listen to your teachers and try your best to answer their questions. Even so, we think there are some important things that everyone in school should try to get better, so that you all do your very best. It hasn't been easy for Miss Curran to make changes,

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

because there have been lots of teachers coming and going, and many of you will have had a number of different teachers. So, we explained that we would like you to do better in your English, mathematics and ICT work; make sure the work the teachers give you is neither too easy nor too hard, but just right; and for Miss Curran and the teachers to keep checking that everyone is doing their best. Mr Johnson and I know that you will help the teachers make Sacred Heart an even better school than it already is.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion