Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Overchurch Junior School

Inspected 8 Feb 2006 · published 6 Mar 2006 · URN 105056

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Michael McIlroy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Feb 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael McIlroy

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    CH49 4NS

  • Name on report verified

    Overchurch Junior School

  • URN verified

    105056

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivelypositiveexceptionallyenjoystrengthsmake good progressimproved
Criticismweaknessesnot alwayslackinadequatenot rigorousnot effectivelyinconsistentdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1258w+65
  • What needs to improve1463w+6

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,680
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%What needs to improve 53%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Overchurch Junior School

p.1

105056 Unique Reference Number Wirral LEA 277283 Inspection number 7 February 2006 to 8 February 2006 Inspection dates Mr Michael McIlroy HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Moreton Road School address Primary Type of school Upton Community School category Wirral, Merseyside CH49 4NS 7 to 11 Age range of pupils 0151 6774150 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0151 5220518 Fax number 395 Number on roll Dr P Elliot Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr G Sumner Headteacher 21 November 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 277283 7 February 2006 - 7 to 11 8 February 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and two additional inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Overchurch Junior School is situated in Upton, a suburb on the Wirral. The school is larger than average. About a quarter of the pupils are eligible for free school meals, which is above average. Very few pupils are of minority ethnic origin or have English as a second language. Four pupils have a statement of special educational need. The school has a few pupils who have learning difficulties and/or disabilities. The majority of pupils join the school from the neighbouring infant school. On entry, the skills and knowledge of pupils are above average. The school has been awarded the Basic Skills Mark.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Overchurch Junior School, 7 February 2006 to 8 February 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

Overchurch Junior School provides a satisfactory education for its pupils and has a number of good features. Pupils enter the school with standards in learning that are above average. By Year 6, standards achieved remain just above average. This is because the progress pupils make in the school is satisfactory. In the past, the school enjoyed a sustained period of higher levels of pupil achievement, under the leadership of the current headteacher. Since his secondment to another post in 2003/04, the school has lost some momentum and pupils' progress has slowed. Leadership and management are satisfactory. The headteacher has a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. He has begun to remedy the weaknesses and under his leadership the school is well placed to move forward again. Middle management is satisfactory but some aspects of subject leadership are underdeveloped. Systems for monitoring and evaluating the work of the school are

p.4

Grade: 3

not rigorous enough. The use of outcomes from these in planning for improvement requires development. Governance of the school is satisfactory. The personal development of pupils is good and the school promotes this well. Pupils are well behaved and willing to learn. Attendance is good and learners enjoy their education. The care and support that pupils receive are also good. The curriculum is good and meets the needs of learners. Teaching is satisfactory overall but assessment is not used effectively enough to ensure that work is matched to the different abilities of learners. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make good progress and most other pupils make satisfactory progress. Some more able pupils do not achieve as well as they could. The school provides satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Increase the proportion of good teaching. • Make monitoring and evaluation more robust and use the outcomes more effectively in strategic planning. • Make more effective use of assessment information to inform lesson planning and improve the challenge presented to all pupils, particularly the more able.

p.4

Grade: 3

Achievement by pupils is satisfactory. They enter the school with levels of attainment in learning that are above average for children of their age. By the time they leave the school, their level of attainment is still above average overall. This represents satisfactory progress. 2 Inspection Report: Overchurch Junior School, 7 February 2006 to 8 February 2006 At the time of the last inspection, the progress made by pupils in their learning was very good. In recent years, however, this has slowed. Over the last three years it was broadly satisfactory. In the 2005 national tests, the achievement of pupils improved in science but dipped in mathematics. In English, fewer of the more able pupils gained the higher Level 5 due to weaknesses in writing. Consequently, the school did not meet all of its targets in 2005. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make good progress. More able pupils do not make as much progress as they could, particularly in English. This is

p.4

Grade: 3

because some of their work is not matched to their abilities and because the pace of learning in some lessons is not fast enough. The school is aware of these weaknesses and is beginning to remedy them.

p.5

Grade: 2

The personal development and well-being of pupils are good. They enjoy being at school as shown by their above average attendance and participation in extra-curricular activities. Pupils cooperate well with each other and adults, and most work hard. Behaviour is good in lessons and around school. Attitudes to learning are positive, although occasionally chatter spoils the concentration of others. Pupils willingly accept responsibility and are cheerful, polite and helpful. The school council provides good opportunities for pupils to develop their understanding of citizenship. Pupils are pleased that their views are acted upon; for example, their requests that the toilets be improved and for a quiet area on the playground have been met. The spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils is good. Lessons in personal and social education help pupils to reflect on issues and develop a sense of

p.5

Grade: 2

right and wrong. Their self-esteem is developed through their involvement in enrichment activities and the celebration of their achievements in assemblies. They gain a knowledge and understanding of world religions and different cultures through lessons. Close attention is given to the development of basic skills and pupils learn to work well independently and collaboratively. These factors are valuable in securing their future economic well-being.

p.5

Grade: 3

The school judges teaching to be good but inspectors found it to be satisfactory overall. In the best lessons, teaching was lively, interesting and learning proceeded at a good pace. Teachers had high expectations of behaviour, the most able pupils were stretched and learning was enriched by a variety of exciting activities. In one good 3 Inspection Report: Overchurch Junior School, 7 February 2006 to 8 February 2006 science lesson, for example, pupils enthusiastically played an exciting revision quiz prior to their main learning activity. Weaknesses in the satisfactory teaching included slow pace, activities that did not hold pupils' attention, and a lack of challenge for more able pupils. Work was not always well matched to the ability of pupils. When lessons were not stimulating or well structured enough, the rate of learning was slower, but the good personal development of pupils meant that almost all pupils were

p.5

Grade: 3

well behaved. Skilled teaching assistants ensure that pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities learn well. Assessment procedures are satisfactory but are not used effectively enough to identify underachievement and improve the pupils' progress.

p.6

Grade: 2

The curriculum is good and meets statutory requirements. It meets the needs of most groups of pupils well, including those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. However, it does not always meet the needs of the more able pupils. Close attention is paid to developing the basic skills in literacy and numeracy. A good start has been made to the linking of subjects in a cross-curricular manner in order to make learning more relevant. An emphasis on the arts on special curriculum days and themed weeks extend the creative opportunities presented to pupils. The impact of these is visible in the outstanding artwork on display. Good use is made of visits and visitors to enrich learning. Pupils in Year 6 benefit from a residential visit, which boosts their academic and social development well. A wide range of extra-curricular activities is available, including sports, recorders, chess and choir. The school has its own orchestra. Careful

p.6

Grade: 2

attention is given to developing awareness of the need to exercise regularly, to stay healthy, and to avoid the temptations and risks that they may face as they get older.

p.6

Grade: 2

Pupils are well cared for and there are good procedures for health and safety. Consequently, pupils feel safe in school, trust staff and know where to turn for help. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are fully included in activities. They have clear individual educational plans, and parents and outside agencies are fully consulted. Procedures for tracking the progress of pupils and analysing what they need to do next are inconsistent. There are pockets of good practice which need to be shared throughout the school. Academic targets for more able pupils are not always sufficiently challenging. 4 Inspection Report: Overchurch Junior School, 7 February 2006 to 8 February 2006 The great majority of parents are supportive of the school and most consider that their children are extremely well cared for. Child protection procedures are in place. Staff praise pupils for their positive attitudes to work, for their politeness and the care and

p.6

Grade: 2

consideration they show to others. In this way, pupils are well prepared for the next stage in their education and later life. Year 6 pupils are adequately prepared for secondary education. They visit local high schools for lessons. Specialist teachers from these schools visit to give taster lessons in subjects ranging from design technology to physical education. The school encourages pupils to embrace healthy lifestyles. There are healthy options offered at lunchtime. On Tuesdays, the Parent Council sells toast at playtime and on 'Fruity Fridays' pupils can purchase fruit.

p.7

Grade: 3

The school judges the quality of leadership and management to be good. Inspectors found it to be satisfactory. The headteacher has led the school successfully for many years. He has successfully fostered the good personal development of pupils which has created the basis for good learning. Since his temporary secondment, however, the school has lost some momentum. While standards overall remain above national averages, they have declined from their previously high level. This is because the rate of progress made by the pupils has slowed. The school's self-evaluation is sound. The headteacher has a good understanding of the strengths of the school and of where it needs to improve. He has identified key weaknesses and begun to remedy them. His good track record over many years and some improvements since the last inspection, such as the introduction of procedures to track pupils' progress, demonstrate that the school under his leadership has the capacity

p.7

Grade: 3

to improve. Subject leaders and other postholders provide satisfactory leadership and management in their areas of responsibility. They monitor planning and have an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in their areas. Some aspects of subject leadership, however, are underdeveloped. There is a lack of consistency in the application of whole-school 5 Inspection Report: Overchurch Junior School, 7 February 2006 to 8 February 2006 policies. The monitoring and evaluation of subjects are not sufficiently rigorous to enable issues that affect pupils' progress to be identified at an early stage and tackled effectively. The school is inclusive. Parents and pupils are consulted about developments. Positive suggestions, such as the creation of a chess club, have been adopted. Governance is satisfactory. Governors are very supportive of the headteacher. They are informed about the work of the school but do not always provide enough challenge

p.7

Grade: 3

to its leadership. The school provides satisfactory value for money. 6 Inspection Report: Overchurch Junior School, 7 February 2006 to 8 February 2006 .

p.8

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 Inspection Report: Overchurch Junior School, 7 February 2006 to 8 February 2006

p.9

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.10

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.10

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.10

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.10

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.10

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.10

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.10

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.11

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.11

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.11

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.11

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for being so polite and helpful when we inspected your school recently. I am writing to let you know some of the things we saw during our visit. Some of the best things we saw at your school were: - your behaviour is good and you are polite and kind to each other and to visitors - you are well looked after by your teachers and other adults - you enjoy your school and know how to live healthily and stay safe - the wide range of sports and clubs that you can participate in - your art and display work - much of this is outstanding. We have asked your headteacher, staff and governors to make your school even better. We would like the school to: - carry out more visits to classes to see that all of you are learning well and to see how things can be made even better for you - check that the work you receive is hard enough for you - make your lessons more interesting for you by speeding up the activities you do and by adding

p.12

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

greater variety to what you do in class. Once again, many thanks for your help and politeness when we visited your school.

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion