Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Hudson Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Oct 2005
- Inspectorssingle source
Ian Thompson
- Achievement verified
Inadequate
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
L31 5LE
- Name on report verified
Hudson Primary School
- URN verified
104869
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- AchievementInadequate
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.9
- The school is a safe and friendly place so that pupils are happy to be there and enjoy learning. p.4
- We agree with you that the school is a happy place where everyone is safe and can enjoy themselves. p.11
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Raise standards and achievement in Years 3 to 6 by making better use of assessment data for planning, target setting and monitoring pupils' performance. p.4
- Define roles and responsibilities for school improvement at all levels of management, including the governing body. p.4
- Children in the Foundation Stage make good progress. p.4
- Those who have recently started have settled into the school quickly and are already making good progress in developing their knowledge, skills and understanding. p.4
- Pupils make good progress through Years 1 and 2 and by the age of seven, standards are above average. p.4
- Results in national tests have been consistently above average and shown a rising trend. p.4
- In contrast, results in tests at the age of 11 have shown a continuous decline over four years. p.4
- Results in 2004 were below average, indicating that pupils had made poor progress through Years 3 to 6 in relation to their earlier 2 Inspection Report: Hudson Primary School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005 learning. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,807
- about usual (typical 3071)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 44
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
104869 Unique Reference Number Sefton LEA 277240 Inspection number 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005 Inspection dates Mr Ian Thompson CfBT Lead Inspector Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Moorhey Road School address Primary Type of school Maghull Community School category Liverpool, Merseyside L31 5LE 3 to 11 Age range of pupils 0151 5261568 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0151 5200616 Fax number 206 Number on roll Ms A Cooke Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Jayne Hains Headteacher 29 November 1999 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 277240 10 October 2005 - 3 to 11 11 October 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by two additional inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
Hudson Primary is a smaller than average school. All pupils are from white British backgrounds. Pupils' standards are broadly average when they join the school but the balance of higher and lower attainers varies from year to year. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is about average; a below average proportion has a statement of special need. Fewer pupils than average are eligible for free school meals. Higher than usual proportions of pupils join or leave the school at other than the usual times. Over recent years, the school has seen significant reorganisation and has had a period of considerable turbulence in staffing. The acting headteacher has been in post since September 2005.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Hudson Primary School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005
p.3
Grade: 4
The school evaluates its effectiveness as satisfactory, largely on the basis of recent structural changes. Some changes have already been made by the acting headteacher that have had an impact on pupils' progress, such as the reorganisation of classes and the deployment of classroom assistants. However, it is too soon for these improvements to have had a positive effect on overall achievement. Inspection findings are that the school is not doing well enough. Although progress in the Foundation Stage and in Years 1 and 2 is good, pupils' overall progress through the school has not been good enough and standards have fallen over the last four years. In accordance with section 13(3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement because it is performing less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a Notice to Improve. Significant improvement
p.4
Grade: 4
is required in relation to standards and achievement. Pupils' personal development is good because the school manages this aspect of its work well. The school takes good care of all its pupils. The school is a safe and friendly place so that pupils are happy to be there and enjoy learning. Attendance is satisfactory and improving. Overall, the school gives satisfactory value for money. Although the school has made unsatisfactory progress since the last inspection, the recent changes in leadership and management together with good support from the local authority have given it the capacity to improve.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Raise standards and achievement in Years 3 to 6 by making better use of assessment data for planning, target setting and monitoring pupils' performance. • Define roles and responsibilities for school improvement at all levels of management, including the governing body.
p.4
Grade: 4
Children in the Foundation Stage make good progress. Those who have recently started have settled into the school quickly and are already making good progress in developing their knowledge, skills and understanding. Pupils make good progress through Years 1 and 2 and by the age of seven, standards are above average. Results in national tests have been consistently above average and shown a rising trend. In contrast, results in tests at the age of 11 have shown a continuous decline over four years. Results in 2004 were below average, indicating that pupils had made poor progress through Years 3 to 6 in relation to their earlier 2 Inspection Report: Hudson Primary School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005 learning. Provisional results for 2005 show a further decline. The sharpest fall has been in science but mathematics results have also shown a significant decline over the last two years, particularly in the performance of the most and least able pupils. Progress
p.4
Grade: 4
through the school for all pupils was poor. Analysis by the acting headteacher identifies a number of possible causes for the decline in performance. Among these are changes in teaching and support staff; lack of specialist support affecting the learning of pupils with additional learning difficulties; the use and organisation of support staff; class and curricular organisation and the inadequate use of assessment data to support planning. Steps have already been taken to deal with these matters, particularly targeting performance in Years 3 to 6, and plans drawn up to tackle the many issues. Although it is too early to see any significant impact on standards, in work seen during the inspection, pupils in Years 3 to 6 are now beginning to make satisfactory progress due to improvements in teaching and learning brought about by the acting headteacher's initiatives.
p.5
Grade: 2
The school evaluates personal development as good. Inspectors agree with this judgement. Children enjoy coming to school and are positive in their comments. They were heard to say that the school is a friendly place that is free from bullying and where they enjoy being. They have positive attitudes towards their learning and work hard in lessons sharing and cooperating with each other very well. They understand right from wrong and are courteous and polite to each other and to visitors. Their behaviour in lessons, in the playground and around the school is good. Their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. A thriving School Council contributes effectively to pupils' sense of community. They are proud to be members of it and understand that they are elected to help others and to improve their school community. Pupils know what to do to adopt healthy lifestyles. Healthy eating is encouraged and the school is working towards the Healthy
p.5
Grade: 2
Schools Award. Attendance is satisfactory but the school recognises that too many pupils take holidays during school time and is working to remedy this situation.
p.5
Grade: 3
Pupils' achievement over recent years indicates that teaching and learning were not as good as they should have been in Years 3 to 6. As a result of changes made this term, teaching and learning are much improved so that pupils are now making satisfactory progress. There is some good teaching across the school that provides a platform for improvement. 3 Inspection Report: Hudson Primary School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005 The key strength of teaching is the way that teachers build upon good relationships to manage their classes. Little time is wasted in dealing with unacceptable behaviour. The great majority of pupils respond well to teachers' consistent expectations of behaviour and work well together. The majority of lessons are planned effectively to make sure all pupils are given appropriate activities that make them want to learn. However, it is here that the quality of teaching varies across the school. It is better in the Foundation Stage and in Years
p.5
Grade: 3
1 and 2 because teachers plan a greater variety of tasks. This not only maintains interest and challenge for pupils of all levels but helps keep up a good pace of learning throughout lessons. Occasionally, the pace and quality of learning tail off over the session because not enough is demanded of pupils. Work is usually matched well to pupils' individual needs so that there are no significant differences in the learning of different groups of pupils. Nevertheless, assessment information is not used to best advantage for target setting or tracking pupils' progress. As a result, more able pupils are sometimes given work that is too easy for them. The school recognises the need to develop this aspect of its work; support and training are already planned. Classroom assistants contribute well to promoting the progress of different groups of pupils. They work effectively with teachers to support pupils' learning.
p.6
Grade: 3
All statutory requirements are met and the curriculum is now matched to the needs of all the pupils in the school. It is organised to enable pupils to build on what they have already achieved, learning skills as well as factual knowledge. Pupils with additional learning difficulties and/or disabilities are included in all the activities because they now receive targeted support within the classroom from experienced classroom assistants. There are now more opportunities for pupils to investigate and solve problems in mathematics and science. Appropriate intervention strategies such as 'booster' groups have been planned to enhance the curriculum and raise standards in the core subjects. As with many very recent improvements, it is too soon to see an impact on pupils' achievement. Work in the classroom is complemented by opportunities for pupils to take part in a range of other activities, visits and work with visitors to the school. For example, the
p.6
Grade: 3
artist in residence who worked with pupils throughout the school during the inspection. The good range of sporting activities helps to extend and develop pupils' skills and add to their enjoyment of learning.
p.6
Grade: 2
This is a caring school that takes good care of all its pupils. Pupils feel safe here and trust the staff, knowing that there is always someone they can turn to if they need help. Parents thoroughly endorse that Hudson Primary School is a safe place for their children. Staff know the pupils well and are aware of any circumstances that may have 4 Inspection Report: Hudson Primary School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005 a detrimental effect on a pupil's learning. Good arrangements are in place for the induction of children into the nursery and the main school. Parents commented that the Nursery and Reception class teachers were 'brilliant'. Health and safety routines and all risk assessments are in place. The school uses the local authority documentation before any trips or residential visits are made. Child protection procedures are very well established. Pupils who are at risk, for whatever reason, are quickly identified and supported. The school works successfully with outside
p.6
Grade: 4
The acting headteacher provides exceptional leadership and management that have had a clear impact on all aspects of school life in a very short time. This impact is to be seen particularly in the sense of purpose among staff and the support of parents. The evidence is that, although at an early stage, the school has already begun to turn around. As one parent wrote to inspectors, 'You can sense the change in the school'. Staff are unequivocal in their view that morale has greatly improved. Until recently the school has not evaluated its performance well enough to identify and tackle the issue of pupils' underachievement. Since the beginning of the current term, the acting headteacher has conducted a rigorous and accurate evaluation of the school's work. This has identified where improvement is needed, centred on consideration of all pupils' needs. Plans have been developed to manage improvement based on a clear understanding of the priorities and things are getting better.
p.7
Grade: 4
Leadership and management at other levels in the school are not secure. At senior level, the school currently has no deputy headteacher. Important responsibilities cannot be delegated so that too much depends upon the drive and energy of a headteacher who is in a temporary appointment. A long term strategy and structure for the school's leadership and management have yet to be put in place, although the local authority is providing considerable support. Teachers holding posts of responsibility have only recently had their jobs clearly defined and been able to undertake them. Governance is inadequate. Governors have until recently not fully understood their roles, responsibilities or powers. Although they have been, and are, supportive of the school, they have not held it to account for its declining performance. They now understand what needs to be done to secure improvement and are keen to move the
p.7
Grade: 4
school forward. 5 Inspection Report: Hudson Primary School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005 .
p.7
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Hudson Primary School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 4 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 4 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 4 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 4 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
As you know, Mr Ashcroft and I visited your school to check on how well it is doing. Thank you very much for the way you welcomed us into your school. We enjoyed talking to you about your work and your life in the school. We agree with you that the school is a happy place where everyone is safe and can enjoy themselves. The best things about the school are: - the arrangement to help you settle in - the school cares for you all equally - most of you behave well and get on well together. We have asked your teachers to improve some things to make your school a better place to learn. These are: - to help you make better progress as you move up through the school (you can help with this by making sure you know what you should do to improve your work) - to make sure that the people who have responsibilities for different aspects of school life know clearly what it is they should be doing to make the school better.
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Thank you for helping us with our work. We hope that you carry on enjoying lessons and continue to help Mrs Hains and your teachers to make Hudson a better place to learn.
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion