Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Nicholas's Catholic Primary School

Inspected 25 May 2006 · published 21 Jun 2006 · URN 104657

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Michael McIlroy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 May 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael McIlroy

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    L3 5XF

  • Name on report verified

    St Nicholas's Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    104657

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+36Positivemore positive than 16% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongvery effectiveexceptionallypositivevery wellgood progressimprovedenjoy
Criticismweaknessesbelowlackinadequatelimitedslowweaknot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1190w+73
  • What needs to improve1535w+8

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,689
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 43%What needs to improve 56%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report St Nicholas's Catholic Primary School

p.1

104657 Unique Reference Number Liverpool LEA 277200 Inspection number 24 May 2006 to 25 May 2006 Inspection dates Mr Michael McIlroy HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Orthes Street School address Primary Type of school Liverpool Voluntary aided School category Merseyside L3 5XF 3 to 11 Age range of pupils 0151 7095532 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0151 7088330 Fax number 194 Number on roll Professor K Holden Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Anne Edmondson Headteacher 22 May 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 277200 24 May 2006 - 3 to 11 25 May 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and one Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

The school is below average in size and serves an inner-city area of Liverpool, which has more than three times the level of social disadvantage found nationally. Approximately 40% of pupils are eligible for free school meals. Over half of pupils are of minority ethnic origin and over 40% have English as an additional language (EAL). A small minority of pupils are from families of overseas students who are studying locally. The number of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities (LDD) is below average and few have a statement of special educational need. The school has strong links with the local church. Over the past year the school has undergone considerable changes in staffing.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Nicholas's Catholic Primary School, 24 May 2006 to 25 May 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school provides a satisfactory education for its pupils and has a number of good features. Pupils enter the school with standards in learning below that found nationally. They make satisfactory progress in the Foundation Stage and good progress by the end of Key Stage 1. In recent years, pupils in Key Stage 2 have not achieved as well as they might have. However, last year there was an improvement in pupils' overall achievement and most pupils made satisfactory progress. Evidence seen during inspection suggests that this improvement is continuing. The leadership and management of the school are satisfactory. The majority of teachers are new to the school and changes in staffing have concerned some parents. The headteacher has provided strong leadership during this unsettled period and has worked hard to ensure continuity in learning and to improve standards. However, there is inconsistency in how some school policies, such as assessment procedures, are

p.4

Grade: 3

applied. Some aspects of middle management, notably subject leadership, are underdeveloped. Governance is satisfactory. Teaching and learning are satisfactory overall, with some good features. The personal development and well-being of pupils is good. The behaviour of most pupils is good. The curriculum is satisfactory, as is the care, guidance and support that pupils receive. Pastoral support for pupils is good, but not all receive enough academic guidance. The school has the capacity to improve further and offers satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Ensure stability in staffing. • Increase the proportion of good teaching in the school. • Develop the roles of the new leadership team and of subject managers. • Improve assessment procedures so that pupils receive better academic guidance.

p.4

Grade: 3

The school judges the achievement and standards of pupils to be satisfactory. This matches the view of the inspectors. Pupils enter the school with levels of skills and knowledge in learning which are below average. They make satisfactory progress overall in the Foundation Stage and by the end of this key stage a majority achieve the early learning goals set them. In 2005, the standards achieved by pupils in the Key Stage 1 assessments matched the national average. Pupils did much better in reading and mathematics than in writing. The most recent assessments indicate that standards have risen further. When pupils' low starting point is taken into consideration, this represents good progress. 2 Inspection Report: St Nicholas's Catholic Primary School, 24 May 2006 to 25 May 2006 Pupils make slower progress in Key Stage 2. In 2003 and 2004, the achievement of pupils was significantly below that made by similar pupils nationally, although the

p.4

Grade: 3

2004 results showed an improvement. In 2005 the progress made by pupils improved again, although fewer pupils achieved as well as they could have in science. Most pupils achieved satisfactorily, including those with LDD and EAL. More able pupils achieved above average results. The school achieved most of its targets in 2005. Evidence gathered during the inspection, and data provided by the school, suggest that this improvement is currently being sustained.

p.5

Grade: 2

The personal development and well-being of pupils is good. The spiritual, social, moral and cultural aspects of school life are well developed through assemblies and the school's welcoming and caring ethos. Pupils are given time to reflect on issues and have a well-developed sense of right and wrong. The school is a successful community of many nationalities. One parent commented that it has a 'good understanding' of the needs of pupils from abroad. Pupils show their commitment to racial equality in the harmonious way in which they work and play together. They are polite and courteous to visitors. The behaviour of most pupils is good, but occasionally some pupils are allowed to distract others from learning. Attendance is satisfactory. Pupils enjoy coming to school and are keen to learn. Pupils know how to keep safe and who to talk to in the event of any bullying. They are aware of the dangers of hazardous substances and of the healthy lifestyle choices they

p.5

Grade: 2

can make regarding food and exercise. For example, some choose to drink water in class. Pupils play sensibly at break times and many take advantage of the sporting opportunities offered to them. Pupils make a positive contribution to the school and wider community. The school council is very effective. It has suggested improvements to playground facilities which have benefited all pupils. Future economic skills are developed through opportunities to organise and participate in charity fundraising. Their efforts have helped the school achieve 'Fair Trade' status. 3 Inspection Report: St Nicholas's Catholic Primary School, 24 May 2006 to 25 May 2006

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching is satisfactory overall and some is good. In the best teaching, work was carefully tailored to match pupils' abilities and expectations were high. Teachers set out clearly what pupils were to learn and lessons were interesting, fast-paced and stimulating. Consequently, pupils listened carefully and knew what was expected of them. For example, in one good science lesson on healthy eating, clear instructions by the teacher were followed by purposeful and enthusiastic discussions by young pupils as they swiftly and accurately categorised a wide range of foods. Otherwise satisfactory teaching was characterised by a lack of pace, limited use of resources and a lack of challenge for some learners. These caused the rate of learning to slow. Occasionally, weak behaviour management allowed some pupils to become inattentive and distract others from their learning. Pupils with LDD and those with EAL are well supported in their learning by a specialist

p.6

Grade: 3

teacher and extra teaching assistants. Teachers assess pupils' work regularly and in some classes pupils made effective use of strategies to assess their own learning. There are systems in place to track the progress of pupils, but these are not always adhered to.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory. This matches the school's judgement. It is broad and balanced and meets statutory requirements. It meets the needs of pupils, including those with EAL. There is an appropriate focus on the core subjects of English, mathematics and science. Information and communication technology (ICT) skills are satisfactorily developed. Spanish is taught to a number of year groups. Homework is set to extend learning. Some older pupils benefit from occasional homework clubs. Learning is enriched by visits to local museums and sites of historical interest, such as the local docks. Year 6 and Year 2 pupils benefit from residential visits. Pupils' experiences are further enhanced by visitors, such as dance and theatre troupes, and by themed weeks, such as 'health week'. Pupils with LDD are included in all activities and the school provides some enrichment opportunities for more able pupils. There

p.6

Grade: 3

are a number of sports clubs, such as football, badminton and netball and other clubs such as drama, dance and digital photography.

p.6

Grade: 3

The school judges the care, guidance and support which pupils receive to be good. Inspectors found it to be satisfactory. 4 Inspection Report: St Nicholas's Catholic Primary School, 24 May 2006 to 25 May 2006 Pupils are well supervised in and around school. Staff readily help pupils if they are hurt or upset. Additionally, pupil advocates also care and help other pupils. The Pastoral Care leader provides good support to vulnerable pupils. Robust child protection procedures are in place. Risks are carefully assessed to ensure the safety of pupils on educational visits. New pupils are carefully inducted into school life. Academic guidance for pupils is satisfactory. Pupils receive targets to work towards but not all are sure of what they are. Marking is generally regular and positive, but too often it does not provide pupils with enough guidance on the next steps needed to improve their work. Individual education plans are in place for pupils with LDD, but there is scope for

p.6

Grade: 3

involving parents and pupils more in the review of these. Systems for the early identification of pupils with LDD are underdeveloped.

p.7

Grade: 3

The school judges leadership and management to be satisfactory overall and inspectors agree. The headteacher provides strong leadership. She has led the school through a period of considerable staffing change. Staffing is not yet stable and this concerns some parents. Throughout this difficult time she has sought to ensure that standards in learning are maintained and improved. A new management team has only recently been formed which is starting to move the school forward. Robust systems exist to monitor the quality of teaching and learning. The headteacher has tackled weaknesses in teaching determinedly. However, opportunities for new staff to observe good practice are limited. Strategies such as booster classes, and the deployment of extra support staff with appropriate foreign language skills, have contributed to the improvement in achievement. Assessment information is used to identify 'focus groups'

p.7

Grade: 3

of pupils who are at risk of underachieving. The headteacher has placed a strong emphasis on developing pupils' personal development through initiatives such as the 'behaviour for learning' programme. The headteacher's self-evaluation of the school's effectiveness is broadly accurate. She knows its strengths and where it needs to improve. Issues identified in the last inspection report have been satisfactorily addressed. Middle management is satisfactory. Key staff, such as the co-ordinators for special educational needs and assessment, provide sound leadership, as does the Foundation and Key Stage 1 leader. Subject leadership is underdeveloped. A new system of organising subject teams has been slow to develop, partly because of staffing discontinuity. Core subject leaders are aware of the major strengths and weaknesses in their subjects, but some do not yet monitor teaching of their subject. Not all subject

p.7

Grade: 3

managers scrutinise the work of pupils in their subject. This is partly because a number of them are new to their role following the recent staffing changes. The school consults parents on major developments but would like to be consulted more. Governance is satisfactory. Governors provide support for the headteacher but 5 Inspection Report: St Nicholas's Catholic Primary School, 24 May 2006 to 25 May 2006 there is scope for greater involvement in the work of the school. The school has the capacity to improve and provides satisfactory value for money. 6 Inspection Report: St Nicholas's Catholic Primary School, 24 May 2006 to 25 May 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 Inspection Report: St Nicholas's Catholic Primary School, 24 May 2006 to 25 May 2006

p.9

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.10

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.10

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.10

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.10

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 3 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.10

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.10

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.10

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.11

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.11

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.11

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.11

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for being so courteous and helpful when we inspected your school recently. Here are a few of the best things we saw: - You enjoy school and work and play together very well. - You are very well cared for. - Some of you are 'pupil advocates'. - The behaviour of most of you is good. - You have a very effective school council. - You have lots of interesting clubs to take part in. We have asked your headteacher, governors and staff to make some changes in order to make things even better for you at school. These are: - to make staffing more stable - make all teaching as good as the best - to provide more training for teachers to help them carry out the jobs they do in school, outside the classroom - to change marking so that you know what to do in order to get better at your work. Once again, many thanks for your help and politeness during our visit to your school.

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion