Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Lindens Primary School

Inspected 15 Sept 2005 · published 26 Jan 2006 · URN 104212

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Doris Bell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Sept 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Doris Bell

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    B74 2BB

  • Name on report verified

    Lindens Primary School

  • URN verified

    104212

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentSatisfactory
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressexceptionallyenjoyeffectivelyimprovedsafepoliteoutstanding
Criticisminadequatenot good enoughnot effectivepoornot yetweaknessesdisruptiondeclining

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1478w+22
  • What needs to improve1390w+31

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,838
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 44
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%What needs to improve 48%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Lindens Primary School

p.1

104212 Unique Reference Number Walsall LEA 277102 Inspection number 14 September 2005 to 15 September 2005 Inspection dates Doris Bell AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Hundred Acre Road School address Primary Type of school Streetly Foundation School category Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands B74 2BB 3 to 11 Age range of pupils

p.1

0121 3539273 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0121 3539273 Fax number 348 Number on roll Mr Tony Beeson Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Simon Griffiths Headteacher 8 May 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 277102 14 September 2005 - 3 to 11 15 September 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

With 328 pupils on roll, 159 boys and 169 girls, Lindens is bigger than most primary schools. The number will increase during the year as it takes more children into the nursery each term, on a part time basis. The socioeconomic background of the majority of pupils is better than average and attainment on entry to the school is above the attainment of children of a similar age. The proportions of pupils receiving free school meals, or who have learning difficulties, are lower than in most schools. This term, the school admitted for the first time, five pupils with physical disabilities and is now a resourced school for ten such pupils. The pupils are assigned to the year groups according to their age. There is a small number of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds and an even smaller number who do not have English as their first language. However, all speak English fluently. The school had a new headteacher two

p.3

Description of the school

years ago. He has operated without a deputy headteacher for much of the time since his appointment, coping with significant disruption to the senior management team and the long term absences of the key members of staff leading literacy and numeracy. Low staff morale, declining standards, unsatisfactory pupil behaviour and a building in a poor state of repair added to these difficulties. The school is involved in several projects with other schools and the local education authority, aimed at raising standards and achievement in literacy and numeracy.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Lindens Primary School, 14 September 2005 to 15 September 2005

p.3

Grade: 4

In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could be reasonably expected to perform. The school is therefore given a Notice to Improve. Significant improvement is required in relation to pupils’ achievement, assessment and monitoring and evaluation. Children get off to a good start in the Foundation Stage where they make good progress, as do pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities throughout the school. Learning for these pupils is regularly checked and work planned for them meets their learning needs. This rate of progress slackens in Years 1 and 2 and by the end of Year 6, standards in English and science are only average. In mathematics, they are below average and pupils’ progress is not good enough. Overall, the school is not as effective

p.4

Grade: 4

as it could be because the quality of teaching is not good enough and pupils are not making enough progress particularly in mathematics. Consequently, the school is not providing good enough value for money in relation to the standards pupils reach. The school has experienced significant staffing difficulties which the headteacher has had to manage without the support of a deputy. These difficulties have undoubtedly impeded the school’s progress since the last inspection. Nevertheless, the headteacher has raised the teachers’ confidence in their ability to improve and to lead and manage their subjects. Overall, the quality of leadership and management is satisfactory although the school’s own evaluation of its effectiveness is not sufficiently robust. The improvements that have taken place in the school ethos, relationships throughout the school, and the staff’s determination to work together to achieve improvement,

p.4

Grade: 4

give confidence that the school does have the capacity to improve. However, the systems to bring about improvement have not been in place long enough to demonstrate their effectiveness in reversing the history of underachievement evident in the school’s national test results.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•improve achievement, especially in mathematics •raise teachers’ expectations of what pupils can do by using the information gained from assessments to plan challenging work and help pupils to do better •establish rigorous systems for monitoring, evaluating and improving teaching and learning.

p.4

Grade: 4

Children start school with levels of attainment that are better than those expected for their age. They make good progress in the Foundation Stage and reach above average standards at the end of their Reception year. Standards are still above the national average in reading, writing and mathematics by Year 2. However, by Year 6, they are broadly average in English and science, but in mathematics, they fall to below average 2 Inspection Report: Lindens Primary School, 14 September 2005 to 15 September 2005 and pupils do not achieve well enough. The school is aware of this and has begun to tackle the underachievement, following a period when there was no sustained leadership of the subject and teachers’ expectations had not been high enough. Pupils do not yet have learning targets but the school is setting these imminently following the results of the optional tests that the pupils were taking during the inspection. Pupils

p.4

Grade: 4

with learning difficulties and disabilities do have targets and they make good progress towards them. This is because their learning is regularly assessed and adapted to suit their different learning needs, and they receive good support in and out of class.

p.5

Grade: 3

Pupils enjoy coming to school and older pupils talk enthusiastically about how the school has improved in recent times. Attendance is satisfactory. Pupils know the importance of eating and drinking healthily and of keeping themselves fit and safe because the school places good emphasis on these aspects of its work. Pupils behave well and demonstrate good attitudes to school and to learning. It is to their credit that this good behaviour continues through lessons or parts of lessons when teachers sometimes talk for too long. They are quiet, polite and respectful and value highly the opportunity they have to contribute to the school’s improvement through the school council, and to take on responsibilities, such as being play leaders. They have responded particularly well to the integration of pupils with physical disabilities and readily assist them at work and play. Pupils develop well morally and socially and the good range

p.5

Grade: 3

of activities outside of the normal school day contributes to this development. Assemblies and displays around the school contribute to pupils’ understanding in these areas, but there are few opportunities in lessons for pupils to think and reflect for themselves.

p.5

Grade: 4

Teaching is good in the Foundation Stage because staff know and assess their children well, tasks are interesting and challenging and, as a result, the children’s progress is good. Teaching is satisfactory in Years 1 and 2, but in Years 3 to 6 it is inadequate. Although teaching on a lesson-by-lesson basis is satisfactory, its impact on pupils’ progress is not effective enough. Plans are detailed but they do not show what different groups in the class will learn. Too often, teachers’ expectations of the pupils are too low and tasks are too easy. This was evident in one English session and is particularly evident in mathematics. It happens because teachers do not have sufficient information about what pupils already know and understand, and this is because they do not record individual pupils’ progress well enough. However, there are strengths in the way staff promote pupils’ good behaviour, and pupils work well together when asked to do so.

p.5

Grade: 4

3 Inspection Report: Lindens Primary School, 14 September 2005 to 15 September 2005 With help and direction from the headteacher, teachers are now planning together, sharing expertise and thinking about the different approaches they might use so that activities match the different ways in which children learn. However, not all teachers are adapting their teaching to meet pupils’ needs and, as a result, pupils become restless, particularly during the opening and closing parts of lessons.The time left at the end of lessons is not used well for assessing what pupils have learned, and marking does not give them clear guidance as to how to improve. However, pupils praise the good use teachers make of information and communication technology. They think that the new interactive whiteboards are ‘great’ because ‘You think you are playing games, but you are really learning!’. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities

p.5

Grade: 4

have good personal support from staff in and out of lessons. They are fully included in all activities and make good progress.

p.6

Grade: 3

The use of national strategies and guidelines ensures that learning is built upon each year, although teachers are not yet using these guidelines well enough to plan work that meets the needs of individual pupils. The curriculum for children in the Foundation Stage meets the needs of the children well. Throughout the school, work for pupils with learning and physical difficulties is planned well, ensuring their good progress. There is a good range of clubs and after school activities available for pupils to join, which help them to learn how to get on well with each other. Educational visits and visitors make the curriculum more interesting and extend and enrich pupils’ learning. One group of pupils spoke enthusiastically about when they visited Aston Hall to learn about the Great Fire of London and of how one of the children was dressed up as Samuel Pepys.

p.6

Grade: 3

The good ethos, the safe and attractive environment and the good relationships throughout the school reflect the good pastoral care, guidance and support given to the pupils. This is especially noticeable in the successful integration of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities and the attitudes and caring approach of staff towards all pupils. Good attention is given to the pupils’ health, safety and well-being and to the promotion of healthy lifestyles. At an academic level, assessment information is not used well enough to set targets and help pupils understand how they might improve their learning, except in the Foundation Stage and for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities.

p.6

Grade: 3

The headteacher has successfully brought the school to a point where open consultation has established a unity of purpose and created good teamwork amongst staff and 4 Inspection Report: Lindens Primary School, 14 September 2005 to 15 September 2005 governors. Governors, staff and the majority of parents are united in their praise for the improvements so far. The head has moved the school forward without a deputy, nurturing in the staff an understanding and acceptance of the need to change and improve, and dealing with the long term absences of the literacy and numeracy coordinators on maternity leave. All staff share his vision of a much improved school. The school development plan has highlighted accurately the areas in which much improvement is needed, including standards, and demonstrates the school’s ability to evaluate itself is satisfactory. Governors fulfil their statutory duties and have begun

p.6

Grade: 3

to visit classes to check on pupils’ learning. They have worked closely with the headteacher, managing the finances well and supporting him effectively through a turbulent period. The accommodation and the resources for learning are good and good use is made of external agencies, particularly to support pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities. All of the school’s work has due regard for equality of opportunity for all. The headteacher has an accurate picture of the quality of teaching of each member of staff and has used this information appropriately in their deployment. Performance management is in place for teaching staff and targets satisfactorily reflect the school’s accurately identified priorities. The strong focus on raising standards shows that the school does have the capacity to improve despite the weaknesses it has had to address. Overall, improvement since the last inspection has

p.7

Grade: 3

been satisfactory. 5 Inspection Report: Lindens Primary School, 14 September 2005 to 15 September 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Lindens Primary School, 14 September 2005 to 15 September 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you very much for making us so welcome in your school and talking to us about yourselves and your work. We enjoyed visiting your school and finding out about how you learn. We liked these things most of all: •you behave well in lessons and around the school •you are polite and courteous, even when on occasions you have to sit for too long listening to your teacher, or your work is too easy •you enjoy coming to school; you take good care of it and you have a good understanding of how to stay healthy and safe •you work well together when you are asked to, and you willingly help others in class and around the school. These are the things we have asked your school to work on now: •helping you to do better in your work because you are capable of much more than you are being asked to do at the moment •using the information from the tests you take and from the work you do throughout the year to help you learn more and to let you know how you could

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

do better •checking on how well your teachers teach and making sure that you are always taught well. We hope you will all achieve much more as a result of the school making these improvements and that you will enjoy learning throughout your lives.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion