Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Boldmere Junior School

Inspected 28 Feb 2006 · published 21 Mar 2006 · URN 103341

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Paul Sadler

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Feb 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Sadler

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    B73 5SD

  • Name on report verified

    Boldmere Junior School

  • URN verified

    103341

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrengthseffectivelyexceptionallygood progresspositivehappyimproved
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysnot yetinadequateweaknessinsufficientbelowvariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1185w+63
  • What needs to improve1293w+22

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,446
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%What needs to improve 52%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Boldmere Junior School

p.1

103341 Unique Reference Number Birmingham LEA 276897 Inspection number 27 February 2006 to 28 February 2006 Inspection dates Paul Sadler AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Cofield Road School address Primary Type of school Sutton Coldfield Community School category West Midlands B73 5SD 7 to 11 Age range of pupils 0121 4643656 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0121 6059355 Fax number 342 Number on roll Mr D J Sansom Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Diane Thomas-Wood Headteacher 20 September 1999 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 276897 27 February 2006 - 7 to 11 28 February 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Boldmere is an average-sized junior school. It is situated in a residential part of Sutton Coldfield. It shares a large site with an infants’ school, from which most pupils transfer at the age of seven, and provides out-of-school care for children from both schools. The proportion of pupils receiving free school meals and those with learning difficulties and disabilities are below average.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Boldmere Junior School, 27 February 2006 to 28 February 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school’s effectiveness is satisfactory. Pupils leave the school with above- average standards and their achievement is satisfactory. They do not achieve highly enough in writing and in mathematical problem solving, although in the latter, improvement is well underway. Pupils’ personal development and the care, guidance and support they receive are good. As a result, pupils are happy, self-confident and mature, and they take full advantage of what the school offers. This includes a wide range of activities, including clubs, sporting and other physical activities, trips and visitors. The ‘Busybodies’ club provides very good care for pupils before and after school. Information and communication technology (ICT), a weakness at the last inspection, is now good. Attendance, pupils’ behaviour and the emphasis placed on health, safety and enjoyment of school are other strengths. Teaching is satisfactory. Although the

p.4

Grade: 3

teachers track the pupils’ progress well, they do not yet use information they acquire to best effect when planning future work. The curriculum is broad but does not link subjects together in a way that promotes rapid learning. The leadership’s judgement that the school’s effectiveness is good is too generous. Although they know the strengths and weaknesses, senior managers do not analyse sufficiently the school’s performance in the national context. Neither the monitoring of the teaching nor the level of debate by staff and governors about the pupils’ standards and the quality of provision is rigorous enough. The school provides satisfactory value for money. The matters raised in the last inspection have been dealt with effectively and the school has the capacity to make further improvements.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•Raise the achievement of more able pupils, especially through enhanced teaching of advanced writing skills in writing. •Increase the range of approaches to the monitoring and evaluation of teaching in order to improve its quality. •Strengthen the analysis of strengths and relative weaknesses through an improved understanding of the school’s performance and by raising the quality of debate and challenge among staff and governors.

p.4

Grade: 3

From their above-average standards when they first join the school, the pupils achieve satisfactorily and attain above-average standards in English and mathematics by the time they leave at the end of Year 6. Standards in national tests have regularly been above the national average, though there has been some year-on-year variation. In 2005, results fell in mathematics and writing, and the targets the school had set itself were not achieved. The action taken to improve standards in these areas is proving successful in mathematics and pupils 2 Inspection Report: Boldmere Junior School, 27 February 2006 to 28 February 2006 are making good progress, for example, in solving mathematical problems. As a result, targets set for 2006 should be achieved. Pupils can write extensively, using a range of styles, but for more able pupils there is insufficient emphasis on teaching more advanced writing skills. Some pupils are held back by weaknesses in spelling and

p.4

Grade: 3

handwriting and more work is needed to ensure targets are achieved. Pupils have very good speaking and listening skills and can talk at length, with maturity and confidence, on a wide range of topics. Pupils achieve well in a number of other subjects, such as ICT, where they can construct sophisticated presentations. This is a significant improvement since the last inspection. There is little variation in the achievement of boys and girls, a result of effective action taken by the school to address differences that occurred in the past.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils’ personal development is good. There are effective procedures to promote pupils’ health, safety and well-being. Most pupils eat the school’s healthy lunches. Many attend the wide range of extension activities, including the good, out-of-school ‘Busybodies’ club, designed to promote pupils’ social and physical development and to increase their confidence and self-esteem. The school council is not yet an effective channel for representing pupils’ views on major school issues. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. They behave well, have positive attitudes to learning and relate well to staff, visitors and each other. Pupils’ knowledge and understanding of their own and other cultures and faiths are promoted well through assembly themes, music, art, history and literature and through visitors to the school, such as African artists. Pupils’ attendance is good and most arrive prepared and ready

p.5

Grade: 2

to learn. Older pupils undertake responsibilities, including prefect duties and mentoring of younger pupils. Most pupils participate in fundraising activities for local and national charities. There are strong links with the local community which the school uses well to enhance both the pupils’ social and educational experiences.

p.5

Grade: 3

The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory and some of it is good. Almost all lessons have good features, including clear instruction, good opportunities for speaking and listening, good relationships between pupils and teachers, and effective management of behaviour. Work is planned for pupils’ differing abilities but in some cases does not fully meet the needs either of the more able or the least able. Plenary sessions are not always used well to clarify pupils’ misconceptions and assess the learning of individual pupils. In the best lessons, teachers use a wide range of strategies to interest and motivate the pupils and provide challenging tasks for the most able. For example, in a Year 4 3 Inspection Report: Boldmere Junior School, 27 February 2006 to 28 February 2006 mathematics lesson pupils made good progress on work on division because the topic was presented in a way that enabled all pupils to apply their knowledge of multiplication

p.5

Grade: 3

and division to solving written problems. Mathematics is mostly taught to groups of pupils of similar ability, which is leading to more rapid progress. The standard of presentation of pupils’ work varies from pupil to pupil but this is not always commented upon by teachers when they mark the work. Teachers track pupils’ progress carefully and are beginning to use the information to match the work to meet individual needs, though they do not always use it consistently and productively to plan the next work.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory. It is broad and includes all national curriculum subjects and religious education. However in some classes a disproportionate amount of time is allocated to English and mathematics, without making clear the links to other subjects. There have been significant improvements to the provision for ICT since the last inspection and teachers are now using this well to support children’s learning. The curriculum is enriched by a very good range of extra-curricular activities, such as dance, choir and sport, which contribute well to pupils’ personal, social and physical development. Teachers, parents and outside coaches all contribute well to the school’s programme of activities.

p.6

Grade: 2

Care, guidance and support are good. Pupils generally settle into the school quickly because they are given good support and guidance. The vast majority of parents are very supportive of the school and say their children are happy there. Some would like more information about their children’s progress. There are effective procedures for risk assessment to ensure that pupils are safe. The procedures for child protection are clear and are understood by staff. Pupils know who to talk to if they have a problem or are worried. A programme of personal, social and health education helps to prepare pupils for the later responsibilities of adult life. Academic support is satisfactory. The school works closely with parents and professionals to ensure that the special educational needs of its pupils are met.

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory. Senior managers, staff and governors share a vision of enabling each pupil to achieve his or her potential. The successful realisation of this is shown in the pupils’ self-confidence and maturity. The views of parents and pupils are increasingly sought and acted upon. The leadership is managing a legacy of staffing issues effectively, for example, the impact on the pupils’ standards and the quality of their learning of long-term staff illness and changes of staff. The leadership knows the school’s strengths and is tackling 4 Inspection Report: Boldmere Junior School, 27 February 2006 to 28 February 2006 the relative weaknesses with increasing rigour but still has some way to go because the criteria for what makes an effective school are not yet fully understood by all senior managers and governors. Until recently, this has hampered professional debate and challenge. Teaching is monitored and strengths and development points are

p.6

Grade: 3

identified, but teaching quality has not been evaluated thoroughly enough to make sure it is as good as can be. There has been significant improvement in the areas identified in the last inspection, including pupils’ achievement in ICT and the quality of financial planning and monitoring. In the light of this, and of the changing culture to one of increasing professional challenge, the school has the capacity to improve further. 5 Inspection Report: Boldmere Junior School, 27 February 2006 to 28 February 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Boldmere Junior School, 27 February 2006 to 28 February 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

The inspectors who visited your school very much enjoyed talking and listening to you and seeing your work. We want to thank you for spending the time to do this. This letter is to tell you what we thought of your school and how it can be even better. We think your school is satisfactory. The best things about the school are: •The school helps you to become mature and confident young people. •You are well cared for. •You are taught to lead healthy and active lives. •You are taught well to use ICT safely, to help you learn. •Most children come to school regularly and on time. •The school provides a lot of good clubs, trips and activities, including the Busybodies club. •Those of you who find school work hard are given good help. We think the school could improve even more if: •Those of you who find work quite easy were taught more advanced things, especially in writing. •The teachers found out more about how they could improve their teaching. •More was found

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

out about the best things that other schools do, so these things could be done in the school.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion