Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Water Mill Primary School

Inspected 15 Nov 2005 · published 8 Dec 2005 · URN 103326

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Nov 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tom Shine RISP

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    B29 6TS

  • Name on report verified

    Water Mill Primary School

  • URN verified

    103326

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+75Very positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelymake good progresseffectiveexceptionallyhigh expectationssuccessfullypositivegood progress
Criticismweaknessesinadequatenot effectivebelowlimitedexclusionslownot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1263w+65
  • What needs to improve1285w+79

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,517
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%What needs to improve 50%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Water Mill Primary School

p.1

103326 Unique Reference Number Birmingham LEA 276893 Inspection number 14 November 2005 to 15 November 2005 Inspection dates Tom Shine RISP Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Water Mill Close School address Primary Type of school Selly Oak Community School category Birmingham, West Midlands B29 6TS 4 to 11 Age range of pupils

p.1

0121 4647769 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0121 4645043 Fax number 184 Number on roll Mr Steve Pratt Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Ms Jenny Edginton Headteacher 1 March 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 276893 14 November 2005 - 4 to 11 15 November 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Water Mill is a smaller than average primary school. Its pupils reflect the diverse population of the area where there is a wide range of social and ethnic backgrounds and a high level of economic and social disadvantage. About 45% of the school population is from minority ethnic groups, the majority of whom speak English as an additional language. The largest group is from the Philippines. There is a much higher than usual movement of pupils in and out of the school, with many arriving at short notice and speaking no English.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Water Mill Primary School, 14 November 2005 to 15 November 2005

p.3

Grade: 2

This is an effective school that gives good value for money. This differs from the more conservative view of the school that judged it to be satisfactory. However, that judgement was made five months ago when the new headteacher and her deputy were much less experienced. The quality of education overall, including teaching, is good. This enables the pupils to achieve well when they enter the school and attain high standards when they leave. All pupils, including those with learning difficulties and disabilities, and others in the early stages of learning English as an additional language, make good progress in English, mathematics and science and in their personal development and well-being. There is a warm atmosphere in the school and the levels of care and support for the pupils are good. There are also good systems in place to check how well the pupils are doing. But some teachers’ marking is not effective

p.4

Grade: 2

enough in telling pupils how they can improve their work. Standards and provision in the Foundation Stage are good. The curriculum is good in literacy, numeracy and science, but there are weaknesses in information and communication technology (ICT) in Years 1 and 2, as the organisation of the computers does not enable skills to be taught regularly and systematically. The headteacher knows the strengths of the school well, and weaknesses such as in ICT have been identified for improvement. She leads the school effectively and has successfully tackled the issues raised in the last report. The headteacher knows what needs to be done to move the school forward and to make it become even more effective.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•provide more access to computers in Years 1 and 2 to enable pupils to improve and practise their skills more frequently •ensure all teachers’ marking shows pupils more clearly how to improve their work.

p.4

Grade: 2

Children’s key skills when they enter the reception reflect their wide range of backgrounds and pre-school experiences. Overall, they are slightly below average for their age. The good provision in the reception enables most children to make a good start to their education and to progress well. The pupils make good progress from Years 1 to 6, except in mathematics in Years 1 and 2, where progress is satisfactory. Standards in Year 6 are above average in English, mathematics and science. This is reflected in the national tests over the last five years and is similar again in 2005. Pupils are achieving well, including pupils from minority ethnic groups and those with learning difficulties and disabilities. In Year 2, standards are broadly in line with national averages for reading and writing and below in mathematics. The school has set challenging but achievable targets for the pupils in the current Year 6. Standards in

p.4

Grade: 2

ICT in Key Stage 1 are not as high as they are expected to be because of the limited 2 Inspection Report: Water Mill Primary School, 14 November 2005 to 15 November 2005 number of computers available to these pupils. In art and design, there are examples of very high quality work throughout the school.

p.4

Grade: 2

Pupils’ personal development is good. Pupils make good progress in developing their moral understanding, social skills and cultural awareness. Pupils are positive about school. They especially value meeting their friends and teachers. They work hard in lessons and clearly enjoy learning. This underpins the good progress that they make. They behave well in classrooms and at playtimes and respond well to the staff’s high expectations of good behaviour. Pupils from all ethnic groups get on well with each other. There are very few recorded instances of bullying and these are dealt with well. There were two fixed term exclusions last year, both on health and safety grounds. Attendance is broadly average, with some families taking their children on holiday during term time. Most pupils are punctual at the start of the day, with a few persistently late in spite of the school’s best efforts. Pupils are conscious of the need

p.5

Grade: 2

to stay healthy and safe and the school council, for example, has been proactive in making suggestions about healthy school lunches. Pupils are keen to contribute to the smooth running of the school and also work together well on charity fund-raising projects. They are developing the self-confidence and skills to help them in later life.

p.5

Grade: 2

Teaching and learning are good overall, although in a few year groups they are satisfactory. This overall good quality of teaching is the main determinant of pupils’ good progress and achievement by the time they leave the school. Teachers use their good subject knowledge effectively, particularly when teaching literacy and numeracy, and have high expectations that all groups of pupils will do their best. Teachers know the pupils well, enabling them to set realistic targets and have good systems to check on how well the pupils are learning. However some teachers’ marking does not show clearly enough what pupils should do to improve their work. Teachers ensure pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are given work matched well to their needs enabling them to make good progress. Teaching assistants are also used effectively to ensure these pupils and those in the early stages of learning English as

p.5

Grade: 2

an additional language are given good support, either in class or in small groups, to achieve their targets. Teaching is good in the reception class. The teacher begins assessing the children’s levels of attainment as soon as they enter the reception to enable all learning activities to be matched to their needs. As a result of good teaching and encouraging and supportive staff, the children get off to a very secure start. 3 Inspection Report: Water Mill Primary School, 14 November 2005 to 15 November 2005

p.5

Grade: 2

The school plans interesting work for its pupils. It is securely based on the guidance for children in the Foundation Stage, the National Curriculum and the locally agreed syllabus for religious education. It successfully engages all pupils in developing their skills, knowledge and understanding through relevant projects and activities. Pupils are equipped effectively to achieve well in later life. There is a good programme to ensure that pupils learn how to stay healthy and safe. Work in classrooms is enhanced by a good range of special events, visits, visitors and out of school clubs. The school has won several awards for curriculum innovation including an Artsmark Silver Award. Currently, all the pupils in Year 4 are receiving expert brass tuition and are learning to play new instruments loaned for the academic year and funded by a national grant.

p.6

Grade: 2

The good provision for pupils is based on very good relationships and mutual trust between staff and pupils. Staff know the pupils well and work hard to meet their individual needs through focused support and clear guidance. There are good procedures in place to check on the progress that pupils make in both their academic and personal development. These are used effectively to identify and support the special needs of individual learners. Pupils in the early stages of learning English as an additional language have their needs assessed as soon as they come to school and are given effective support that enables them to make rapid progress. Staff work closely with parents to enhance pupils’ progress and are able to call on outside agencies when necessary. There are good arrangements to help pupils new to the school to settle in quickly, especially those who arrive during the course of the year. There are also good procedures to ensure that pupils are safe at school and child

p.6

Grade: 2

Leadership and management are good. This differs from the school’s view that judged it to be satisfactory. This is because the headteacher and her deputy make an effective team, manage the school well, and know what needs to be done to bring about further improvements. The headteacher has quickly assessed the school’s strengths and weaknesses and has shared her vision successfully with all staff. This is to maintain high standards and to ensure that pupils’ personal needs remain a high priority within a caring community. The school is proud of its reputation as having ‘the best parts of a village school on a city street corner’ and the headteacher is keen to nurture its strong family ethos. All staff feel valued and, as a result, work well as a team. The school improvement plan for the current year, which takes account of the views of parents and pupils, including the school council, contains sensible priorities, including

p.6

Grade: 2

4 Inspection Report: Water Mill Primary School, 14 November 2005 to 15 November 2005 improvements to ICT. Governance is good. The governors have a clear understanding of their role, and are very supportive and committed to the success of the school. 5 Inspection Report: Water Mill Primary School, 14 November 2005 to 15 November 2005 .

p.6

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Water Mill Primary School, 14 November 2005 to 15 November 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Water Mill Primary School Water Mill Close Selly Oak Birmingham B29 6TS 16 November 2005 Dear Pupils Thank you very much for all the help you gave to the inspectors when they came to your school a few weeks ago. We liked talking to you and to your teachers and coming to your assembly. Now we want to share with you what we thought about your school. These are the things we liked most about your school: •when you first come to school in the reception, you make a good start to your education and do well. •You do well in English, mathematics and science because you have good teachers. •Mrs Edginton runs the school very well and makes sure those of you who need extra help get it. •you told us you feel safe and well supported and that you like school because ‘all teachers and children are friendly’. •you are taught the importance of exercise and you like the change to healthier meals. But to make things even better we have suggested a few things we think will help:

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

•we think pupils in the younger classes should be given opportunities to use computers more to learn and practise their skills. •we also think it would help when your teachers mark your work if they told you what you need to do to improve it. Yours sincerely Tom Shine Lead Inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion