Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Cofton Primary School

Inspected 18 Oct 2005 · published 1 Dec 2005 · URN 103315

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Oct 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bogusia Matusiak-Varley RISP

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    B31 4ST

  • Name on report verified

    Cofton Primary School

  • URN verified

    103315

Page 5 of 11
Page 5 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentSatisfactory
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 65% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyexceptionallyeffectiveimprovedhigh qualityenjoyexemplarypositive
Criticismweaknessesweaklackinadequatenot yetbelowineffectiveinsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1439w+18
  • What needs to improve1389w+4

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,799
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 44
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%What needs to improve 49%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

103315 Unique Reference Number Birmingham LEA 276888 Inspection number 17 October 2005 to 18 October 2005 Inspection dates Bogusia Matusiak-Varley RISP Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Wootton Road School address Primary Type of school West Heath Community School category Birmingham, West Midlands B31 4ST 4 to 11 Age range of pupils

p.1

0121 4753374 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0121 477 9082 Fax number 353 Number on roll Mr Lee Winfield Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Elizabeth Richardson Headteacher 19 June 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 276888 17 October 2005 - 4 to 11 18 October 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by a team of three additional inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Cofton Primary School is in West Heath, close to Longbridge in Birmingham. Numbers have fallen since the last inspection due to a decrease in birth rates. The percentage of pupils on free school meals is below the average. The proportion with learning difficulties and disabilities is well below average although the number with statements is in line with expectations. Most of the pupils are of White British heritage. The newly appointed headteacher has only been in post since January 2005.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Cofton Primary School, 17 October 2005 to 18 October 2005

p.3

Grade: 4

At present, the school provides unsatisfactory value for money. In accordance with Section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005 HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement because it is performing significantly less well in all circumstances than it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a Notice to Improve. Significant improvement is required in standards, the use of assessment information to aid pupils’ progress, the quality of teaching in Years 3 to 6, the provision for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities, the role of coordinators and attendance. Despite the unsatisfactory progress since the last inspection, the school’s capacity to improve is satisfactory because the new headteacher, senior management team and governing body are working effectively as a team, have a clear picture of what needs to be done and have adequately identified the school’s weaknesses. Early indications

p.4

Grade: 4

of improvements as a result of this are most clearly seen in the overall satisfactory provision for the Reception class and the satisfactory teaching with good features seen in Years 1 and 2, where pupils’ achievements are satisfactory. Standards are average in reading, writing, mathematics and science by the end of Year 2 and above average for speaking and listening. Standards in art and design are also above the expectation and pupils achieve well. Pupils’ achievements are unsatisfactory in English, mathematics and science in Years 3 to 6 where standards at the end of Year 6 are below average, and higher attaining pupils are not achieving as well as they could. This is mainly because of unsatisfactory teaching and the weak use of information on pupils’ progress. Pupils have good attitudes to learning, behave well and want to learn. However, their attendance is below average. The curriculum is broadly satisfactory and well enriched

p.4

Grade: 4

with visits, visitors and extra clubs. Care, guidance and support are satisfactory overall but there are weaknesses in the provision for pupils with learning difficulties and this leads to these pupils making insufficient progress. Although leadership and management are now satisfactory, there are significant weaknesses in the role played by coordinators.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•Raise standards and pupils’ achievements in Years 3 to 6 in English, mathematics and science by ensuring that information on pupils’ progress is used effectively to challenge all pupils and that teachers raise their expectations of what these pupils can achieve. •Raise attendance levels by reducing the number of holidays taken in term time. •Improve the role of coordinators to ensure that they check how well pupils are doing in their areas of responsibility. •Improve the provision for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities by ensuring the strategies used to improve the progress they make are more sharply linked to their individual needs. 2 Inspection Report: Cofton Primary School, 17 October 2005 to 18 October 2005

p.4

Grade: 4

Children enter the Reception class with average standards. They make satisfactory progress and are broadly in line with the expected standards by the end of the year except for personal, social and emotional development, which is above average. In Years 1 and 2, pupils make good progress in speaking and listening and standards are above average. In reading, writing, mathematics and science pupils attain average standards and their achievements are satisfactory. Good developments recently have led to improved progress particularly for the lower attaining pupils. In Years 3 to 6, teachers do not build sufficiently well on pupils’ previous achievements. As a result, achievement is unsatisfactory, especially for higher attaining pupils and those with learning difficulties. In Year 5, teachers have much higher expectations, for example high quality presentation of writing, and pupils in this year group make

p.5

Grade: 4

satisfactory progress. Nevertheless, this does not prevent below average standards by the end of Year 6 in English, mathematics and science. Much emphasis is placed on art and design and standards are high and pupils make very good progress. In information and communication technology (ICT), pupils attain average standards. Targets set for pupils are realistic but not ambitious. Year 6 pupils just missed their targets in 2005 in English and mathematics. The school evaluates itself slightly better than inspection findings however the headteacher is fully aware of the low standards in Years 3 to 6.

p.5

Grade: 3

Provision for spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory. Pupils know right from wrong, behave well and have a sound understanding of different faiths. Pupils have good attitudes to learning even when lessons are not sufficiently challenging. They say that they especially enjoy art and design and working in the computer suite. In Years 1 and 2 and in the Foundation Stage, they develop good working habits and show increasing signs of independence. Pupils work together effectively through the use of ‘talking partners’. Attendance is just below average but there is a high level of authorised absence because pupils take holidays in term time. However, the school’s actions to raise pupils’ awareness of this have raised levels of attendance in recent years. Pupils develop healthy lifestyles and the school council reports that pupils receive a balanced diet with plenty of choices as a result of recent improvements. Pupils’

p.5

Grade: 3

contributions to the community are satisfactory. Pupils develop the school’s grounds, perform to pensioners at Christmas and raised money for the Tsunami Appeal and Red Nose Day. Pupils’ literacy and numeracy skills are not well developed but they have satisfactory ICT skills. Together with their readiness for their next stage of education, this ensures their economic well-being is satisfactory. 3 Inspection Report: Cofton Primary School, 17 October 2005 to 18 October 2005

p.5

Grade: 4

The quality of teaching and learning is unsatisfactory, due to weaknesses in teaching in Years 3 to 6. Teaching is satisfactory with good features in Reception and in Years 1 and 2. This is because staff have taken on board the guidance offered to them by the rigorous monitoring of teaching and learning undertaken by the headteacher. In Years 3 to 6, teaching and learning are patchy. The most effective teaching is in Year 5 where the teachers place high emphasis on improving pupils’ presentation skills and push them on in their learning. Whilst teachers in Years 3, 4 and 6 manage behaviour well and offer good explanations, their effectiveness is hampered by the ineffective use of information on pupils’ progress. As a result, tasks are not matched to pupils’ needs, especially for the higher attainers. Teachers have a weak knowledge of what pupils should be achieving, which leads to a lack of challenge in the targets

p.6

Grade: 4

set and a lack of focus on marking, in helping pupils to know what to do next. The teaching of pupils with learning difficulties is unsatisfactory throughout the school due to weaknesses in identifying their needs in Individual Education Plans.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum covers the required range of subjects for pupils in Years 1 to 6 and areas of learning for children in the Reception class. The curriculum is well enriched with visits, visitors, residential trips and work undertaken by artists and dancers. However, too few opportunities are provided in teachers’ planning to enable pupils to practise what they have learnt in English and mathematics in other subjects. Activities are not rigorously planned in Years 3, 4 and 6 and this leads to underachievement in pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding. For example, there are weaknesses in planning for developing guided reading. The school is very aware of this and plans are in place to rectify it.

p.6

Grade: 3

The care, guidance and support that pupils receive is satisfactory, due to the headteacher’s insistence that every child matters. As a result, pastoral care is effective but is not matched by the provision for pupils’ academic needs. Whilst pupils receive satisfactory guidance in the Foundation Stage and in Years 1 and 2 as to what they need to do to improve their work, this is not the case in Years 3 to 6. Child protection procedures are satisfactory and pupils are confident that they have an adult to turn to if they are worried and know that they will be listened to. Staff ensure that pupils work in a safe, secure and clean environment and the recent art and design work undertaken in Years 3 to 6 in improving the appearance of the school is exemplary. 4 Inspection Report: Cofton Primary School, 17 October 2005 to 18 October 2005

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management of the headteacher, senior management team and governing body are satisfactory. This is because recent initiatives have begun to have a positive impact on school improvement, especially in the Reception and Year 1 and 2 classes. The newly appointed assistant headteacher is having a significant effect on developing good practice in Years 1 and 2. She is now due to develop strategies for raising pupils’ achievement in Years 3 to 6. The senior management team has a clear view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and is soundly placed to make further improvements despite unsatisfactory improvement since the last inspection. However, the leadership and management of coordinators is unsatisfactory and this leads to low standards because, as yet, coordinators are not aware of the standards pupils attain nor are they developing best practice in their areas. This is not the case for the Reception Year where leadership and management are

p.7

Grade: 3

satisfactory. Key information on how well pupils achieve, provided by the headteacher, enables the governing body to make a significant contribution by checking the implementation of particular initiatives. The headteacher has gained the confidence of staff, pupils, parents and the governing body and this supports an effective team effort. She has put in place rigorous systems for performance management but it is too soon for these to have had an effect on teaching in Years 3 to 6. Parents and pupils are regularly consulted and their views are readily taken on board; this is especially evident in the improved quality of school dinners. 5 Inspection Report: Cofton Primary School, 17 October 2005 to 18 October 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Cofton Primary School, 17 October 2005 to 18 October 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 4 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 4 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 3 How well learners enjoy their education NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 4 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for making us feel so welcome in your school. We were particularly impressed with the get well cards the children in the Foundation Stage made for Humpty Dumpty. I am sure that he will feel better when you send them to him. We think that your new headteacher is making a big difference to your school but as she has a lot to do she has not yet managed to ensure that the pupils in Years 3 to 6 are progressing as well as the pupils in Years 1 and 2 in English, mathematics and science. We have made some suggestions to help you improve even further. This is mostly to do with teaching in Years 3 to 6 which is not as good as it could be, for example: •teachers in Years 3 to 6 are not yet fully aware of what you have learnt in Years 1 and 2 and are not moving you on at a fast enough rate •those of you who have additional learning support are not making fast enough progress •standards in English, mathematics and science are not

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

high enough and those of you who find learning easy are not being challenged enough •teachers who are responsible for leading subjects are not yet fully aware of how they can make learning more interesting for you and help you learn at a faster rate •attendance in your school could be even better; quite a few of you go away on holiday in term time. Whilst this is great fun it does nevertheless affect your learning. In spite of these areas for improvement we are pleased with your behaviour and attitudes to learning. Your teachers look after you satisfactorily and they want to do the best for you. I am so pleased to see that you enjoy your residential trips and your displays on river studies in Year 5 are very interesting. Your school environment is really attractive and the wall displays are super. Once again, a big thank you to all. Yours sincerely Ms Bogusia Matusiak-Varley Lead inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion