Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Manford Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Apr 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Robert Lovett
- Achievement verified
Good
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Good
- Postcode verified
IG7 4BX
- Name on report verified
Manford Primary School
- URN verified
102795
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- AchievementGood
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.9
- A strong sense of community and shared values nurtures pupils' personal development and well-being effectively. p.4
- The quality of teaching is good so that most of you make good progress in your time at the school and enjoy your lessons. p.11
- As a result, it is a happy, welcoming place and pupils say they really enjoy coming to school. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils enter the Nursery with standards that are well below average and attainment remains below average by the time they leave the Reception class. p.4
- By the end of Year 2 standards overall remain below average. p.4
- This is because strategies used successfully to raise standards in speaking and listening, particularly for those pupils speaking a first language other than English, have not had time to raise standards in reading and writing. p.4
- By the end of Year 6 achievement overall is good, although some more able pupils are not doing as well as they could. p.4
- As a consequence while most pupils make good progress, not enough reached the higher Level 5 in English and mathematics in 2005. p.4
- Those pupils who are in school longest make the best progress. p.4
- The school has set challenging targets for 2006, particularly at Level 5 and the school's pupil tracking systems suggest it is well placed to achieve these. p.4
- Pupils who speak a first language other than English are also well supported and make good progress because learning is well matched to their individual needs. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,841
- about usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Manford Primary School
p.1
102795 Unique Reference Number Redbridge LEA LEA 276772 Inspection number 26 April 2006 to 27 April 2006 Inspection dates Robert Lovett Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Manford Way School address Primary Type of school Chigwell Community School category IG7 4BX 3 to 11 Age range of pupils 020 8500 2143 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 020 8501 5532 Fax number 427 Number on roll Mr Mike Allen Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Miss Tina Jacobs Headteacher 15 November 1999 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 276772 26 April 2006 - 3 to 11 27 April 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and two Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
Manford Primary is a larger than average school situated on the edge of an established housing estate in Chigwell. Most pupils come from the surrounding wards which are more economically disadvantaged than most. The percentage of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is about twice the national average. A high, and growing, proportion of pupils are from minority ethnic groups and speak a wide range of first languages other than English, mainly Urdu and Panjabi although an increasing number speak French. Of these a significant number are at an early stage of learning English. There is a high level of pupil mobility, with a higher than average number of pupils joining the school other than at the beginning of Year 1. The proportion of pupils identified as having learning difficulties and disabilities is about average as is the proportion with a statement of special educational needs, (SEN).
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Manford Primary School, 26 April 2006 to 27 April 2006
p.3
Grade: 2
This is a good school where every child is valued as an individual. A strong sense of community and shared values nurtures pupils' personal development and well-being effectively. As a result, it is a happy, welcoming place and pupils say they really enjoy coming to school. However, despite the school's best efforts, attendance is below average and too many arrive after the start of the school day. The Foundation Stage provides pupils with a secure and happy start to their time in school. Overall, pupils make good progress and achieve standards which are broadly satisfactory by the time they leave, although some more able pupils are not doing as well as they could. As a consequence, while most pupils make good progress, not enough reached the higher Level 5 in English and mathematics in 2005. Leadership and management are good. The leadership team knows the school's strengths and weaknesses well and has, with governors and others, drawn up a good
p.4
Grade: 2
school development plan. This could be further improved by ensuring the school development plan and subject action plans show how pupils' progress will be measured. The school has made good progress since the last inspection and demonstrates good capacity to improve further. Because pupils make good progress and the school uses its resources well, it provides good value for money.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• raise the achievement of more able pupils • ensure the school development plan and subject action plans include how pupils' progress will be measured • continue to work with parents to improve pupils' attendance and punctuality
p.4
Grade: 2
Pupils enter the Nursery with standards that are well below average and attainment remains below average by the time they leave the Reception class. By the end of Year 2 standards overall remain below average. This is because strategies used successfully to raise standards in speaking and listening, particularly for those pupils speaking a first language other than English, have not had time to raise standards in reading and writing. By the end of Year 6 achievement overall is good, although some more able pupils are not doing as well as they could. As a consequence while most pupils make good progress, not enough reached the higher Level 5 in English and mathematics in 2005. Those pupils who are in school longest make the best progress. The school has set challenging targets for 2006, particularly at Level 5 and the school's pupil tracking systems suggest it is well placed to achieve these. However, the
p.4
Grade: 2
achievement of some more able pupils throughout the school could be better. 2 Inspection Report: Manford Primary School, 26 April 2006 to 27 April 2006 Pupils with special educational needs make good progress because they receive good support in the classroom and from the special educational needs co-ordinator. Pupils who speak a first language other than English are also well supported and make good progress because learning is well matched to their individual needs.
p.4
Grade: 2
Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Learning about other cultures and languages enriches learning, fosters positive attitudes and prepares the pupils well for life in a diverse society. The school actively promotes pupils' interest in, and contribution to, the local community so that they have a good sense of their developing role as citizens. Pupils enjoy learning because their self-esteem is promoted well. Although pupils enjoy being in school, and despite the school's best efforts, attendance is below the national average. In addition, too many pupils arrive after the start of the school day. This has an adverse effect on the education of some pupils. Pupils say, and most parents agree, that rare incidents of bullying are effectively dealt with. Behaviour is very good. Relationships in class and on the playground are good and have a positive effect on pupils' willingness to learn together. Because of this,
p.5
Grade: 2
collaborative working and learning is a real strength of the school. Pupils also enjoy working together to prepare for school performances, while playing games and during the many extra-curricular clubs. Older pupils spoke of the beneficial effect of residential visits and of opportunities to have a voice through the school council. The school is active in encouraging pupils to adopt a healthy lifestyle and pupils respond well. Opportunities to participate in sport and to acquire healthy eating habits are well fostered. As a result, the school has gained a local andquot;Healthy School Awardandquot; and is working towards national recognition for its work. The daily breakfast club is very well attended and makes a positive contribution to pupils' well-being as well as giving them a good start to the day.
p.5
Grade: 2
The quality of teaching and learning is good. As a result pupils make good progress. The Foundation Stage provides a good range of learning opportunities and is sensitive to the individual needs of pupils so that they learn to work together and to take turns and share. This collaborative working prepares pupils well for their future learning. Teaching in Key Stages 1 and 2 is good overall. Relationships amongst pupils and between pupils and adults are very good. Lessons are calm and purposeful and pupils work with sustained concentration. The best lessons are well planned and make very 3 Inspection Report: Manford Primary School, 26 April 2006 to 27 April 2006 good use of partner and group working, enabling pupils to discuss their work and consolidate and extend their learning. The newly installed interactive whiteboards are used very effectively to enliven lessons and engage the interest of pupils.
p.5
Grade: 2
Work is well displayed in classrooms and other areas of the school to celebrate success and support learning. Marking is good, it tells pupils how well they are doing and what they need to do to improve their work. Teachers regularly follow this up and as a result, pupils respond well and make progress.
p.6
Grade: 3
The school provides pupils with an appropriate range of learning activities and experiences. The curriculum in the Foundation Stage is broad and balanced and helps pupils make progress, developing their social and collaborative skills particularly well. The outdoor areas and other spaces within the classrooms provide good opportunities for learning. Teachers use national guidelines effectively to help plan their work across the full range of subjects and are working to enhance the creative curriculum within the school and to develop links between subjects. The curriculum provides well for those for whom English is an additional language, particularly those just beginning to learn the language. It also provides well for pupils who have learning difficulties. It is less effective in consistently meeting the needs of more able pupils. The school offers a good range of lunchtime and out of school clubs
p.6
Grade: 3
and activities such as sports, art, music and computers. Pupils say they value this range of additional provision. The well equipped computer suite contributes well to pupils' learning. They use the computers and internet confidently to carry out independent research. The use of computers could be improved further by their more regular use to support learning in the classroom.
p.6
Grade: 2
The school provides good care and support for its pupils. Most parents and pupils confirm that the school is a secure place where children feel happy and enjoy learning. Behaviour is managed well to ensure a calm, friendly environment. There are good procedures in place to ensure the safety and protection of pupils and staff. Pupils' progress is monitored well overall, and particularly well for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities. This ensures pupils' needs are appropriately identified and suitable support is provided. The school works well with a range of outside agencies to enhance the support available for pupils. The commitment to fostering an awareness of a variety of cultures and languages helps pupils to develop an understanding and respect for their fellow citizens. 4 Inspection Report: Manford Primary School, 26 April 2006 to 27 April 2006 The school, through its commitment to inclusion, successfully prepares pupils for life
p.6
Grade: 2
The leadership and management of the headteacher is very good and she is well supported in her work by the deputy headteacher. The headteacher involves the extended leadership team effectively in the management of the school and ensures they are able to contribute to continuing school improvement. As a result, the school has made good progress since the last inspection and has good capacity to improve further. There is a well defined management structure with clear roles and responsibilities. The innovative use of a senior teacher to manage and develop the work of subject leaders is having a positive impact through ensuring effective training and support. The leadership of SEN is very good. The management of support for pupils speaking a first language other than English is also very good and helps them make good progress. The school has good self-evaluation procedures and knows its strengths and weaknesses
p.7
Grade: 2
well. As part of this process the school consulted well with parents and others. As a result, the school has produced a good development plan. However, this, and subject action plans, could be improved by showing clearly how the impact on pupils' progress will be measured. Resources, including staff, are well used and the school provides good value for money. Most parents are very supportive of the school, one wrote to say his daughter had made 'brilliant progress' and parents spoken to were overwhelmingly positive. Governors are an effective part of the leadership and management team and involve themselves in school life through regular visits to classrooms which enable them to check how well the school is doing. Their involvement in the annual development planning day shows their commitment to helping set the school's priorities. They are very supportive of the headteacher and are aware of her positive impact on the school.
p.7
Grade: 2
5 Inspection Report: Manford Primary School, 26 April 2006 to 27 April 2006 .
p.7
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Manford Primary School, 26 April 2006 to 27 April 2006
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 4 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Pupils I must begin by thanking you all for making us feel so welcome during our time in the school. We were all very impressed by your friendliness, politeness and very good behaviour in lessons and around the school. You were confident and open when telling us what you thought and your views were very helpful in ensuring we got to know the school well. We think you attend a good school. The quality of teaching is good so that most of you make good progress in your time at the school and enjoy your lessons. You told us you like coming to school very much and appreciate the range of clubs and activities the school offers. The Breakfast Club is particularly well attended. The headteacher and all the staff work hard to make the school a better place. They have a clear picture of what is good at the school and what you all need to work harder at. We hope this inspection will help. Most of you do really well, particularly those who find school work
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
most difficult and those of you who are learning English, but some of you said you found some work too easy. We have asked the school to look at how they can make work for more able pupils more challenging, so that you work harder and do even better. The school has a good set of plans to improve but we have asked that these are clearer about exactly how they will help you do better and by how much. We are also suggesting the school continues its good work with you and your parents to improve attendance and to ensure you all get to school on time.We agree with lots of the good things you and your parents said about the school. It's now up to you and your teachers to make it even better. We wish you success in making this happen and hope you enjoy the rest of the summer term. Yours sincerely Robert Lovett HMI (on behalf of all the inspectors)
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion