Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St John's Primary School

Inspected 26 Apr 2006 · published 15 May 2006 · URN 101873

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Philip Mann

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Apr 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Philip Mann

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    W13 0NY

  • Name on report verified

    St John's Primary School

  • URN verified

    101873

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 24% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivelypositiveexceptionallyimprovedconsistentlyeffectiveclear
Criticismweaknessesconcernsinadequatebelowweakpoornot good enoughnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1349w+61
  • What needs to improve1276w+27

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,591
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%What needs to improve 48%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report St John's Primary School

p.1

101873 Unique Reference Number Ealing LEA LEA 276605 Inspection number 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006 Inspection dates Philip Mann AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Felix Road School address Primary Type of school West Ealing Community School category London W13 0NY 3 to 11 Age range of pupils 02085676251 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 02085676646 Fax number 279 Number on roll Margaret Majumdar Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Marilyn Borlase Headteacher 20 November 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 276605 25 April 2006 - 3 to 11 26 April 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

St John's Primary School is about average in size. It serves a mixed community with pockets of significant deprivation. Pupils come from a very wide range of backgrounds with over two thirds having a home language other than English. The proportion of those with learning difficulties is very high and well above average. The overall attainment of pupils into the school at the age of five is well below average. A significant number of these join the school other than in the nursery and reception classes and many leave before the age of 11. There are two speech and language resource units attached to the school.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St John's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

St John's is an improving school which evaluates itself effectively. It identifies that there are some important aspects of its work that it still needs to address. Inspection findings support this view. The school has reversed a period of decline and is becoming more effective in what it does. Good leadership from the headteacher is successfully taking the school through a period of transformation and change. Much has been achieved in developing a positive atmosphere for learning and school identity. As a result, the behaviour of pupils is now good and relationships are very positive around the school. The quality of teaching and learning has improved with some outstanding practice now observed. However, some teachers do not match tasks effectively to the ability of all learners because their use of assessment information is weak. Consequently, when combined with less interesting teaching, this results in underachievement for

p.4

Grade: 3

some learners. The provision for children in the Foundation Stage is good. Staff with responsibility for pupils with learning difficulties and those whose home language is not English provide effective levels of support to these groups of learners. Good care and support are provided for all pupils but despite the efforts of staff, pupil attendance is still poor. Improvement since the previous inspection has been satisfactory overall. The school's capacity for further improvement is now good. This is because planning for school improvement is thorough, and staff with management responsibilities are very clear about what needs to be done next to raise the achievement of all pupils. Taking all factors into account the school provides satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Improve achievement by ensuring teaching is consistently good across the school. • Use assessment information well to ensure a closer match of tasks to the individual needs of pupils in all lessons.

p.4

Grade: 3

The achievement of pupils is satisfactory overall. The starting points of children on entry into the Foundation Stage are very low. Many pupils move in and out of the school and a large number have specific learning difficulties. Standards by age 11 are well below average in English, mathematics and science. However, a review of this data and that collected by the school confirms that progress is satisfactory overall. It is best for pupils with learning difficulties, those whose home language is not English and for the oldest, where progress is good and standards are improving. This is because of the effective support programmes in place and consistently good or better teaching for the oldest pupils. Progress is slow and sometimes unsatisfactory for younger children when the pace of learning is too leisurely and teachers do not use assessment information effectively to plan for the individual needs of pupils in their lessons.

p.4

Grade: 3

2 Inspection Report: St John's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006

p.4

Grade: 2

Pupils are enthusiastic and feel safe about coming to school. One girl explained that, 'You have nothing to worry about at this school because it is very happy'. Attendance at school continues to be a challenging issue and remains well below average despite an innovative approach to lift rates of attendance. Pupils get on well together, speak confidently about their respect and care for one another. They feel safe, enjoy the improved school lunches and speak very positively about the positive management of behaviour. 'I can't wait to receive the gold pen!' was the theme throughout the meeting with the School Council members as they discussed this issue. Pupils feel confident that their views are listened to and that the school will respond positively and quickly. Pupils respond well to opportunities for spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. This is particularly so in assembly because pupils are encouraged to reflect on the

p.5

Grade: 2

issues discussed in a meaningful way. They respond very positively to the values promoted throughout the school and are very interested in one another's cultures and lifestyles. However, their understanding of the wider community and their personal contribution to the place of work in the future are less developed.

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory overall but not consistent in quality throughout the school. Children get off to a good start in the Foundation Stage and benefit from consistently good teaching in Years 5 and 6; some of which is outstanding. Some teaching in other classes is not good enough. However, relationships are positive and behaviour is managed well in all classes. Staff pay close attention to the needs of learners with English as an additional language and those with learning difficulties and disabilities. Teaching assistants make a valuable contribution to pupils' learning. Good focused monitoring of planning and of teaching and learning is leading to improvements but some weaknesses still remain. Where learning is good, teachers have high expectations of pupils, who have a clear understanding of what they need to do to improve. There is good emphasis on developing language skills and this contributes well to pupils being able to discuss

p.5

Grade: 3

and explain their work. Where teaching is not as strong, assessment information is not used well enough to match work accurately to the prior attainment of learners and this has a detrimental effect on achievement. Similarly, insufficient pace leads to a loss of concentration and slower progress. 3 Inspection Report: St John's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006

p.5

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory and has sufficient breadth. The whole school implementation of the personal and social development programme has had an outstanding impact on pupils' behaviour and attitudes to their work. Some medium term planning lacks rigour. Provision for computer work is much improved and the school has been identified for excellence in interactive whiteboard use. Pupils have two hours of sport each week to promote healthy lifestyles. The Foundation Stage curriculum is good but the outside area is not yet fully developed to provide an exciting and stimulating learning and play environment. The provision and specialist support for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities and pupils who are learning English as an additional language are good. A good range of extra curricular activities and partnerships with local organisations contribute well to pupils' learning and personal and social development. The curriculum

p.6

Grade: 3

is enriched well by music, drama, instrumental tuition and links with a wide range of sports clubs.

p.6

Grade: 2

The care, guidance and support provided for pupils are good overall despite some inconsistencies in assessment. Pupils feel safe and secure. Very good induction arrangements for admission into the nursery and for new arrivals in the school ensure that these learners settle quickly. For instance, home visits before children enter the nursery, induction days and coffee mornings are central to the work of the Foundation Stage. Pupils are confident that adults will help them with their personal concerns. Child protection procedures are robust and clearly established by the headteacher and adults working with children fully understand the procedures and receive training to identify potential concerns. The school works well with outside agencies to ensure that pupils with speech and language difficulties receive the best support. Health and safety routines and risk assessments for improving the school's physical environment

p.6

Grade: 2

are effective. The academic and personal development of pupils is monitored regularly by senior staff but data is not always used well by some teachers to meet learners' needs effectively.

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management of the school are satisfactory overall with some emerging strengths. The headteacher demonstrates a very clear desire to transform the school. Significant improvements to the climate for learning have been achieved since her appointment. Issues related to pupil behaviour have been very effectively addressed and targets are being set for staff and learners. Many procedures have been put in place and school management structures are being reorganised after a period of 4 Inspection Report: St John's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006 intensive building work. Teamwork amongst the staff is now good and subject leaders are playing an increasingly important part in whole school improvement. Procedures have been implemented to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Teaching and learning are being monitored regularly and closely linked to performance management. Weaknesses in teaching are being addressed and recent appointments

p.6

Grade: 3

are providing models of outstanding practice. However, the impact of this is yet to be fully realised in the achievement of pupils in all classes. Governors are playing a greater role in monitoring the school's work and possess a clear understanding of it strengths and weaknesses. The school's self-evaluation work is accurate and is being used well to promote further change. As a result, the school is now well placed to raise the achievement of all pupils and the capacity for further improvement is good. 5 Inspection Report: St John's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St John's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 4 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 4 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Pupils I enjoyed visiting your school and I would like to thank you for making me feel so welcome. It is clear that you really enjoy being at St John's and in particular like taking part in the many interesting activities planned for you. I was particularly impressed with Year 4's class assembly on World War II. Teachers work hard to make your lessons interesting and you work hard to complete the tasks that they set for you. However, in some classes these tasks are either too difficult or too easy and this is not helpful. This is something that the teachers are going to improve. While at the school I found that:* some of your teachers provide you with lessons of the highest quality;* staff in the nursery and reception classes are providing good opportunities for young children to learn;* the support for those of you with learning difficulties and those of you who are learning English is good;* teachers use the interactive whiteboards well to make lessons

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

interesting and provide you with plenty of opportunity to take part in extra activities;* staff provide good levels of guidance for you to develop your personal and social skills and teach you how to stay healthy and safe;* your headteacher and senior staff are working hard to make improvements to the school. I also found that:* some lessons are not as good as they could be and this effects the progress of the pupils in them;* even though the teachers provide you with plenty of information about how you are doing in lessons some need to collect and record down more information about your progress and use this well to plan future activities. As a result of my visit the teachers will be working hard to further improve lessons and make sure that tasks always meet your needs. Yours sincerely, Philip Mann Lead Inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion