Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Rangefield Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Jan 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Lyn Riley
- Postcode verified
BR1 4RP
- Name on report verified
Rangefield Primary School
- URN verified
100699
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Lessons are regularly monitored and teachers are provided with verbal and written feedback. p.4
- This has helped to ensure that teaching is at least satisfactory across the school but weaknesses in monitoring and evaluating the impact of teaching on pupils' learning limits further improvement. p.4
- Lessons are effectively planned and organised and pupils are generally attentive and eager to learn.Behaviour in lessons is generally good but some teachers allow pupils to call out and talk whilst they are addressing the class. p.4
- In a music lesson some pupils became very excitable and disruptive when asked to clap along to disco beats. p.4
- The teacher chose to largely ignore their behaviour and eventually, pupils were able to follow the beat, but the pace of the lesson was interrupted by the poor behaviour and resulted in pupils making barely satisfactory progress.Some teachers mark pupils' work, in accordance with the school policy, by providing p.4
- Weaknesses in marking restrict pupils' progress as mistakes go unchecked for unacceptably long periods of time. p.4
- The school's marking and feedback policy is out of date and marking in pupils' books is not monitored thoroughly against this. p.4
- Although the curriculum is satisfactory it provides insufficient opportunities to improve pupils' skills in literacy and numeracy. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,072
- shorter than usual (typical 2508)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Rangefield Primary School Inspection report
p.1
100699 Unique Reference Number Lewisham Local Authority 276369 Inspection number 12 °13 January 2006 Inspection dates Lyn Riley Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll School
p.1
The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs P Daley Chair Mrs M Ayres Not previously inspected Date of previous school inspection Rangefield Road School address Downham Bromley BR1 4RP
p.1
020 8698 3112 Telephone number 020 8695 1753 Fax number
p.1
3 °11 Age group 12 °13 January 2006 Inspection dates 276369 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
Rangefield is a two-form entry primary school, with a part-time nursery. The number of pupils entitled to free school meal is above the national average. Pupils of white British heritage form the largest group in the school. A significant number of pupils from a wide range of different cultures and backgrounds also attend. The number of pupils with special educational needs is above the national average. Attendance is below the national average. Authorised and unauthorised absences are high.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 7 Inspection Report: Rangefield Primary School, 12 °13 January 2006
p.3
What the school should do to improve further
* Improve standards in English, mathematics and science through more effective marking and assessment to guide pupils on how to improve.* Improve some important aspects of leadership, including planning, monitoring and evaluation to ensure that all initiatives have a positive impact on raising standards and improving provision for pupils.* Ensure that the child protection policy and procedures, including training for staff, are up-to-date.* Improve levels of attendance.
p.4
Grade:
Lessons are regularly monitored and teachers are provided with verbal and written feedback. This has helped to ensure that teaching is at least satisfactory across the school but weaknesses in monitoring and evaluating the impact of teaching on pupils' learning limits further improvement. Lessons are effectively planned and organised and pupils are generally attentive and eager to learn.Behaviour in lessons is generally good but some teachers allow pupils to call out and talk whilst they are addressing the class. In a music lesson some pupils became very excitable and disruptive when asked to clap along to disco beats. The teacher chose to largely ignore their behaviour and eventually, pupils were able to follow the beat, but the pace of the lesson was interrupted by the poor behaviour and resulted in pupils making barely satisfactory progress.Some teachers mark pupils' work, in accordance with the school policy, by providing
p.4
Grade:
helpful advice to pupils on how to improve, but most work is marked with ticks and occasional praise comments. Weaknesses in marking restrict pupils' progress as mistakes go unchecked for unacceptably long periods of time. The school's marking and feedback policy is out of date and marking in pupils' books is not monitored thoroughly against this.
p.4
Grade:
Although the curriculum is satisfactory it provides insufficient opportunities to improve pupils' skills in literacy and numeracy. As a result, pupils make uneven progress in some important aspects of their work and standards are not high enough in English, mathematics and science. Provision for information and communication technology has improved significantly since the last inspection and is satisfactory. There is a limited range of extra-curricular activities for pupils. There is lunch-time tuition for guitar and brass instruments and an after-school line-dancing club but no regular additional provision for sporting activities. The school arranges two school journeys each year and makes use of a range of visiting speakers.The Foundation Stage curriculum provides an interesting range of activities across all areas of learning. Children are helped to settle quickly and make sound progress. Provision for pupils with special
p.4
Grade:
4 of 7 Inspection Report: Rangefield Primary School, 12 °13 January 2006 educational needs and for pupils learning English as an additional language is sound. Targets in individual education plans are clear and regular reviews are held with teachers and parents.
p.4
Grade:
Care, guidance and support of pupils are satisfactory. Positive home-school relationships, and the attention paid to pupils' welfare, contribute well to the school's caring ethos. However, the child protection policy is out-of-date and not all members of staff have received full training in child protection procedures, although they are made aware of where to refer concerns. There is an effective school council through which pupils' views are sought and acted upon. The arrangements for the guidance of pupils are satisfactory. Pupils' progress is effectively tracked and targets for improvement are set. Pupils have a satisfactory understanding of their targets and what they need to do to improve their work, but marking is inconsistent.
p.5
Grade:
5 of 7 Inspection Report: Rangefield Primary School, 12 °13 January 2006 .
p.5
Grade:
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 7 Inspection Report: Rangefield Primary School, 12 °13 January 2006
p.6
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Thank you for welcoming us into your school and for taking time to talk to us. We would particularly like to thank the school council for their contribution to the inspection. Inspectors found that the school provides a satisfactory quality of education. Here are some of the things we think your school does well:-* The headteacher and teachers know you and your families well and care for you effectively* The school is warm and welcoming and helps children to settle in quickly* The information and communication technology (ICT) suite is used well and is helping you to improve your ICT skills* The way teachers use the interactive whiteboards helps to make lessons interesting for you. These are the improvements we have asked your school to make:-* Raise standards in English, mathematics and science * Continue to improve attendance* Provide training for your senior teachers so they can make sure everything the school does helps you to learn faster and reach
p.7
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
good standards* Review the child protection policy and make sure all adults in the school are trained to look after you effectively.We wish you well in the future. 7 of 7 Inspection Report: Rangefield Primary School, 12 °13 January 2006
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion