Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary SchoolOfsted inspection, 16 Nov 2006
Ofsted inspected Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School on 16 Nov 2006, led by Andrew Lyons. The overall judgement was Satisfactory. Ofsted published the report on 7 Dec 2006. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
16 Nov 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Andrew Lyons
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
SW16 5SL
- Name on report verified
Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
100633
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 8 of 10 Inspection Report: Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School, 15 °16 November 2006 p.8
- Many parents recognise the good leadership of the head teacher, as one said, 'The excellent head teacher has a very positive effect on the school. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Raise standards, particularly in science and amongst higher attainers p.4
- Improve the quality of teaching by embedding the best practice in all lessons p.4
- Improve the effectiveness of middle managers 4 of 10 Inspection Report: Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School, 15 °16 November 2006 p.4
- Complete the review of policies and practice, particularly those relating to behaviour, bullying, and curriculum organisation p.4
- Most pupils achieve satisfactorily to reach broadly average standards. p.5
- National test results declined from an above average level at the time of the last inspection to a low point in 2005, when they were well below the national average. p.5
- In 2006, the results improved because raising standards in reading, writing and mathematics has been the focus for improvement. p.5
- Pupils use information and communication technology (ICT) well to help them with their work in other subjects. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,660
- about usual (typical 2787)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School Inspection report
p.1
100633 Unique Reference Number Lambeth Local Authority 276357 Inspection number 15 °16 November 2006 Inspection dates Andrew Lyons Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 233 School
p.1
The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Hugh Dale Chair Mr James Robinson Headteacher 5 June 2000 Date of previous school inspection Buckleigh Road School address Streatham London SW16 5SL
p.1
02086795005 Telephone number 02086797771 Fax number
p.1
3 °11 Age group 15 °16 November 2006 Inspection dates 276357 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
Immanuel and St. Andrew's is an average sized school welcoming pupils from a socially and ethnically diverse inner city community. It has a Nursery that takes pupils from three years old, and most of them go on to enter the Reception class. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities is average and the proportion with statements of special educational needs is below average. The proportion of children having free school meals is above average. Over 70% of the pupils come from minority ethnic backgrounds, significantly more than average. The first language of a third of pupils is not English. The new headteacher was appointed in January of this year and the new deputy headteacher and three out of ten teachers joined in September.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 10 Inspection Report: Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School, 15 °16 November 2006
p.3
Grade: 3
The school provides a satisfactory standard of education and is rapidly improving from a period when results have been too low. The new head teacher, together with the governing body quickly identified what needed to improve and have set about determinedly to raise standards and improve the quality of teaching. Consequently, lesson planning has improved and is ensuring that the work more closely matches pupils' needs. A major overhaul of the curriculum has ensured a better coverage of most subjects, although there has been insufficient time for these improvements to be implemented fully, particularly in science. Pupils are now given a clearer idea of how well they are doing and how they should improve. They now have challenging short-term targets in literacy and numeracy which are helping to accelerate their progress. The impact of these changes is ensuring that pupils now make satisfactory progress in lessons
p.4
Grade: 3
and, overall, they are achieving satisfactorily. Standards are improving and are now broadly average. Staff are committed to ensuring that pupils reach the levels of which they are capable and they make good use of assessment information to provide appropriate challenge and support. Teaching is now satisfactory, but the new strategies implemented to improve teaching are not fully embedded across the school. In particular, expectations of higher attaining pupils are uneven, and this slows their progress. The Foundation Stage is getting pupils off to a satisfactory start from average attainment on entry. When they transfer to Year 1 they meet the goals expected for their age. They continue to make satisfactory progress and by the end of Year 2 standards are broadly average in reading, writing and mathematics. In Years 3 to 6, pupils make satisfactory progress and standards are average in English and mathematics, but standards in science remain too low.
p.4
Grade: 3
Behaviour is satisfactory overall and it is often good. New policies and strategies are being introduced that are planned to secure further improvement, but these are not yet implemented fully. Attendance is good. Pupils feel safe and have developed a good understanding of how to lead healthy lives. The quality of care, guidance and support is satisfactory, and pupils now receive sufficient information on how they can improve. Most pupils are well motivated and enjoy learning. Several commented on the fun they have in lessons, especially in literacy. Visits and visitors contribute well to pupils' understanding of the world of work and there are good links that support the school, particularly the church. Leadership, management and governance are satisfactory overall. There are good features, including the leadership of the headteacher, but the leaders' work to raise standards is not yet fully in place. Many of the middle managers are new and not yet fully effective, but have a
p.4
Grade: 3
strong vision of where they want the school to be. Many parents recognise the good leadership of the head teacher, as one said, 'The excellent head teacher has a very positive effect on the school. He seems to be dedicated to improve all aspects of school life.' The school leaders have an accurate view of the school's effectiveness. Much has been achieved in a short period of time, much more is planned. There is satisfactory capacity to improve.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Raise standards, particularly in science and amongst higher attainers • Improve the quality of teaching by embedding the best practice in all lessons • Improve the effectiveness of middle managers 4 of 10 Inspection Report: Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School, 15 °16 November 2006 • Complete the review of policies and practice, particularly those relating to behaviour, bullying, and curriculum organisation
p.4
Grade: 3
Most pupils achieve satisfactorily to reach broadly average standards. National test results declined from an above average level at the time of the last inspection to a low point in 2005, when they were well below the national average. In 2006, the results improved because raising standards in reading, writing and mathematics has been the focus for improvement. Pupils use information and communication technology (ICT) well to help them with their work in other subjects. Overall, pupils with learning difficulties make similar progress to others. There is no significant difference in the progress made by pupils of different backgrounds. Those learning English as an additional language quickly acquire basic skills and then make good progress.
p.5
Grade: 2
Pupils' personal development, including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. They have positive attitudes towards learning and want to achieve as well as they can. The vast majority of pupils behave well. However, a small minority show insufficient consideration for others. Steps are taken to help them to change their behaviour. With input from parents, pupils, staff and governors a new behaviour and anti-bullying policy has been formulated but only partially implemented. Pupils' cultural awareness is developed well through learning about each other in this multi-faith, multi-cultural community. Spiritual understanding is developed well in assemblies and in several areas of the curriculum. Pupils know about healthy diet and lifestyles, and are provided with nutritious lunches. They participate in a range of sports and physical activities in lessons and after school clubs. Throughout the day they work and play
p.5
Grade: 2
safely. Pupils are keen to take responsibility and develop a clear sense of community through activities such as raising funds for charities, the school council, involvement in local recycling schemes and performing at local community events. Attendance is good with appropriate strategies to encourage punctuality. Because of their improving literacy and numeracy skills and their effective use of ICT, pupils are gaining skills that will contribute well to their future economic well being.
p.5
Grade: 3
The quality of teaching and learning varies. It has improved and is now satisfactory. Some teaching is good and, in Year 6, it is often excellent. New teachers are supported well. In lessons, learning is at least satisfactory because a very wide range of strategies is used, including pair and group work and the use of interactive whiteboards captures pupils' interest. There are good opportunities for pupils to discuss their work and extend their thinking. Teachers know their pupils well, and information from assessment helps them plan appropriate work. However, too little is sometimes expected of the more able pupils. Those with learning difficulties and disabilities are supported and encouraged well. Teaching assistants play a key role in the progress 5 of 10 Inspection Report: Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School, 15 °16 November 2006 they make. Most parents are appreciative. As one wrote, 'My daughter's teacher is excellent,
p.5
Grade: 3
full of ideas and an insight how to teach. Thank God for my choice of school!'
p.6
Grade: 3
The school plans a curriculum that includes all subjects and is enhanced by French, Spanish and swimming. The recent review has led to more effective links between subjects and the planning more closely matched the needs and abilities of all pupils. There are gaps, however. The planning for science, for example, does not yet include all aspects of that subject. The ICT resources have improved and pupils benefit from resources such as laptop computers and interactive whiteboards that are used to support many subjects. A wide range of well-attended extra-curricular activities and opportunities for pupils to take instrumental lessons extend the provision. There is a strong commitment to musical activities with a steel band and a hand-bells group. Trips, residential visits and visitors to the school enrich the curriculum, and special events such as Africa Day bring particular focus. Pupils enjoy these activities, contributing to the
p.6
Grade: 3
development of their self-esteem and self-confidence. They participate in local festivals, events in the capital and with local sports clubs.
p.6
Grade: 3
Pupils feel safe in a secure, supportive environment, and their teachers know them well. The caring ethos promotes the inclusion of all pupils. The school works effectively with outside agencies and involves parents in helping pupils to achieve their potential. Vulnerable pupils and those with learning difficulties are identified at an early stage, and good measures are undertaken to meet their needs. Policies and procedures to protect pupils and ensure their health and safety are made clear to all staff, and are carefully implemented. The anti-bullying policy is currently being updated in response to concerns about a small number of pupils whose behaviour to others causes concern. The work of the Learning Mentor and peer mediators is assisting in the resolution of conflict. Although pupils' work is now monitored on a regular basis and group targets are set, the impact of these measures is not yet fully established in
p.6
Grade: 3
helping pupils to know how to improve all of their work.
p.6
Grade: 3
Leadership and management are satisfactory, and are not good as the school judges them to be. This is because many of the initiatives to raise standards are new and their full benefit is not yet felt. Many of the middle managers are new and not yet fully effective. The school leaders have rightly identified the need to improve teaching and learning as the key way of raising standards. As a result, teaching is now satisfactory and this is ensuring that pupils make satisfactory progress. The vast majority of parents are supportive of the school. The governing body has developed new policies and set new practices for the school, such as those for behaviour, bullying and curriculum organisation. However, not all are fully implemented. Staff development has enabled improvements in achievement and personal development. 6 of 10 Inspection Report: Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School, 15 °16 November 2006
p.6
Grade: 3
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 of 10 Inspection Report: Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School, 15 °16 November 2006
p.7
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.8
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.8
Achievement and standards
3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.8
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3 The behaviour of learners 2 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.8
and interests of learners?
3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.8
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 8 of 10 Inspection Report: Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School, 15 °16 November 2006
p.8
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 9 of 10 Inspection Report: Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School, 15 °16 November 2006
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Thank you so much for helping us during the inspection. You made us feel welcome and were kind and friendly. We are writing to let you know our findings. We think the school has gone through a difficult patch when pupils were not doing as well as they should. The school is improving and is now satisfactory. Your parents have confidence in your headteacher to get things better and better, and we do too. We think that all the staff are helping you learn, setting you targets and showing you how to improve. You told us that some of the lessons are fun, and how you like using the new electronic whiteboards and being more involved in your learning. We hope all the lessons soon will be like that. It was good to see you in assembly listening and joining in together. You come from many races and religions and you get on so well together. Perhaps you could show adults a thing or two! You agree with us that you are well cared for.
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
The inspectors have asked the school to help you to make even more progress by doing these important things; • We think you should do even better in your lessons, particularly science, and some of you need harder work, especially those of you who find learning easy, so we have asked for that too. • We have asked the teachers to keep on improving their lessons so that are all as good as the best, and you learn more every day. • We think that some of the managers need more training to do their work even better. • There are going to be important new ways of dealing with behaviour, bullying and what you learn, so we have asked for these to be sorted out quickly. Look after each other and listen to your teachers as they try to give more interesting and exciting lessons so that you can learn better. With best wishes for your future success, Andrew Lyons, Lead inspector 10 of 10 Inspection Report: Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary School, 15 °16 November 2006
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion