Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St. Paul's With St. Michael's CofE Primary School

Inspected 22 Nov 2006 · published 12 Dec 2006 · URN 100269

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Peter Sudworth

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Nov 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Sudworth

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    E8 4PB

  • Name on report verified

    St Paul's with St Michael's Primary School

  • URN verified

    100269

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 26% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveexceptionallymake good progressstrengthsenjoygood progressimproved
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysbelowinconsistenciesinadequatevariableat risknot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1526w+66
  • What needs to improve1478w+10

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,972
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%What needs to improve 49%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

St Paul's with St Michael's Primary School Inspection report

p.1

100269 Unique Reference Number Hackney Local Authority 276280 Inspection number 21 °22 November 2006 Inspection dates Peter Sudworth Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary aided School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 185 School

p.1

The governing body Appropriate authority Rev Dr A Everett Chair Mrs D Whittaker Headteacher 15 January 2001 Date of previous school inspection 57A Brougham Road School address Hackney London E8 4PB

p.1

020 7254 1927 Telephone number 020 7923 2449 Fax number

p.1

3 °11 Age group 21 °22 November 2006 Inspection dates 276280 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Pupils come from predominantly low socio-economic backgrounds with a wide variety of ethnicity and cultures. Attainment on entry is below expectations because many are not fluent in English and just over half speak English as an additional language. A much higher percentage of pupils than nationally are entitled to free school meals and currently a larger proportion than usual have learning difficulties or disabilities.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: St Paul's with St Michael's Primary School, 21 °22 November 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school provides a satisfactory education for its pupils. This judgement is not as high as that in the school's own evaluation because not all pupils in Years 1 and 2 achieve well enough. This is partly the result of staffing difficulties, but also due to weaknesses in assessment. The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory, but is too variable. Some teaching is good, especially in the Foundation Stage. There are strengths in pupils' personal development, the care that staff give to pupils and in the quality of provision in the Foundation Stage, all of which are good. Parents strongly support the school and are appreciative of the good care taken of their children. The leadership and management are satisfactory, with strengths. The headteacher provides calm and effective leadership and forms a good working partnership with the senior management team. Together, they have shown much determination in overcoming

p.4

Grade: 3

staffing difficulties, including recruitment problems. However, subject leaders do not focus closely enough on improving pupils' achievement by the end of Year 2. Pupils achieve satisfactorily overall. Standards are broadly average overall. The children get off to a good start in the Nursery where good teaching results in many making good progress in learning English. However, their communication skills are still below expectations by the start of Year 1. The positive relationships in the Foundation Stage, combined with well chosen activities, support the children's good achievement. They make particularly good progress in becoming independent, working with others, and in developing their knowledge and understanding of the world. The percentage of pupils reaching the expected level in Year 2 in the last few years has generally been falling in reading, writing and mathematics. Standards are below average. By contrast there is a better picture in Year 6. The school exceeded its

p.4

Grade: 3

targets in 2006, particularly in mathematics. Year 6 results have improved in the last two years in English, mathematics and science and standards are close to the national average. This is a happy school which pupils enjoy, shown by their improving attendance which is now above the national average. Staff work hard to create a nurturing and supportive atmosphere where all are valued. However, teachers do not always match work effectively in lessons to pupils' needs, especially for more able pupils. Relationships between staff and pupils are mostly good. Most pupils behave well in class and concentrate on their learning. Pupils undertake any responsibilities well. The curriculum is satisfactory and developing further as better links are made between subjects. The good provision for pupils' personal education ensures that pupils know how to live healthily and safely. Pupils respond well by taking part enthusiastically in the

p.4

Grade: 3

extra-curricular sporting provision. Satisfactory improvement has been made since the last inspection and the school has a sound capacity for further improvement. Pupils are provided with a solid foundation for the next stage of their education and with good personal skills for life.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Address the weaknesses in assessment and the monitoring of pupils' achievement in Years 1 and 2 in order to reverse the fall in the percentage of pupils who reach expectations in reading, writing and mathematics. • Iron out inconsistencies in the quality of teaching so that more is good. In particular, ensure greater consistency in matching work to pupils' abilities in lessons throughout the school, particularly with regard to the more able pupils. 4 of 11 Inspection Report: St Paul's with St Michael's Primary School, 21 °22 November 2006

p.4

Grade: 3

Pupils' achievements are satisfactory and standards broadly average overall. Children's skills are close to expectations in most aspects of their work when they transfer from Reception to Year 1 but are still below in their communication and personal and emotional development. The steady improvement in results at Year 6 in the last two years from a low point in 2004 has resulted from better monitoring of individual pupils' progress and more effective intervention when pupils do not make enough progress. Overall, results in Year 6 in 2006 were above those locally, and close to the national average. Percentages of pupils reaching the expected level by the end of Year 2 have fallen in writing, reading and mathematics in recent years. However, some success at the higher level in writing had meant that overall attainment in writing had shown a consistent improvement until 2006. The fall is in part due to staffing difficulties. It is also because teachers have been uncertain

p.5

Grade: 3

when judging the level of pupils' work and planning their pupils' next steps in learning. In 2006 results were below both local and national averages in reading, writing and mathematics. There are no major differences in the overall progress of boys and girls but British and Black African pupils, especially boys, make the best progress whilst mixed-race pupils generally do less well. Pupils with learning difficulties make similar rates of progress to other pupils. The progress made by more able pupils is satisfactory over time, but varies from class to class in lessons because of inconsistencies in the quality of challenges provided.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils' personal development, including their spiritual, moral and social development, is good. Most pupils behave well, but there have been four temporary exclusions. Pupils form good relationships with pupils in their class from a diverse range of backgrounds. One commented, 'Although it is a church school, there are many children from other religions as well and we are all good friends'. Pupils talk proudly about their heritage and celebrate well the cultural and linguistic diversity within the school. Pupils adopt safe practices because these are promoted effectively by staff. They have a good understanding of healthy living and participate in a range of sports and physical activities. They are aware of environmental issues, for example, the school council is involved in contributing to plans for improving the sporting facilities in the local park. Pupils have a satisfactory range of class and school responsibilities and they carry these out

p.5

Grade: 2

conscientiously. They are proud of the playground friends system where they support other pupils, especially the younger ones. They make a good contribution to the community through fund-raising for charities, such as 'Children in Need'. Their links with a local bank are successful and give pupils some understanding of the world of commerce. Pupils are satisfactorily prepared for the next stage of their education and their future as life-long learners. Their personal and social skills are good.

p.5

Grade: 3

Pupils often make good progress in practical lessons as seen in a Year 5 science lesson where pupils tested each others' pulses before and after exercise. Teaching in the Nursery is a major 5 of 11 Inspection Report: St Paul's with St Michael's Primary School, 21 °22 November 2006 strength because of the carefully chosen learning activities. Skilful interweaving of different aspects of work gives these children a well-rounded foundation preparing them effectively for future learning. Teaching is also good in the Reception class. In Key Stages 1 and 2, teachers manage pupils' behaviour effectively. Lessons are prepared well but they do not always enthuse the pupils. Questioning of pupils is satisfactory but in some lessons too many questions are asked of individuals. Consequently not all pupils are involved in working out an answer or contribute to discussion. In some lessons the same activities are given to the whole class, including the more able pupils, and where this occurs they are

p.5

Grade: 3

under-challenged. The sharing of learning intentions with pupils is variable. In the best practice they are explained well and reviewed at the end of lessons. Teachers have satisfactory skills in using interactive white boards. The pace and interest of lessons pick up dramatically when these are used well. Teachers' marking of pupils' English work in Years 3 to 6 often helps pupils to improve their work.

p.6

Grade: 3

The provision in the Nursery and Reception classes is a real strength. Particularly noteworthy is the way that young children with English as an additional language progress because the activities help develop their language. Throughout the school the provision for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is satisfactory. It is good for pupils with specific disabilities because of the professional support obtained for them. However, curriculum planning does not always help teachers pitch work at different levels. Good use is made of visits to local museums, such as the Jeffrey Museum, and visitors with particular expertise, such as a resident artist, theatre groups and musicians. The curriculum enhances pupils' cultural development well through visits to the opera and focused weeks such as Black History week. A good range of extra-curricular activities, particularly in tennis and other sports, enhance the opportunities for pupils. A good structure of activities is developing

p.6

Grade: 3

for pupils' personal, social and health education. Some good use is made of information and communication technology to enable pupils to research their studies. However, opportunities are missed to use class computers to help with their work in different subjects.

p.6

Grade: 2

Care, guidance and support for pupils are good. The school places much importance on support for personal development so that each individual pupil feels safe and happy. Child protection arrangements are effective and meet all requirements. Health and safety issues are addressed and risk assessments are carried out regularly. The school liaises closely with a range of service providers to ensure good care for all pupils, including those most at risk. Pupils' progress is tracked effectively. Their specific needs are identified and this information is used well to plan appropriate support programmes, particularly for pupils in Years 3 to 6. Assessment of pupils' work in English produces carefully chosen individual learning targets for pupils, which assist their progress. Their mathematics targets are less effective because they do not relate to individuals sufficiently well. The induction for children into the Nursery and Reception is thoughtfully planned, as is the

p.6

Grade: 2

support given to those pupils who join the school at other stages. The vast majority of parents are very appreciative of the school's work. One parent said, 'As a family, we do not belong to 6 of 11 Inspection Report: St Paul's with St Michael's Primary School, 21 °22 November 2006 the same religious denomination as the school, but have always felt appreciated, and welcomed to the school

p.6

Grade: 3

Ably supported by the senior management team, the headteacher has developed and fostered very good relationships and teamwork amongst the staff and between staff, parents and governors. She has successfully established a good induction programme for new teachers, which helps them to settle in quickly, maintaining the pupils' education when staff changes occur. Carefully structured monitoring and evaluation of teaching and learning give a clear view of strengths and weaknesses. This has not always reaped full benefits for the school because of staff changes. Generous staffing has been used effectively to provide extensive support programmes, such as literacy and mathematics tutorials for pupils. These have contributed to improved standards at the end of Year 6. Nevertheless, subject leaders have not been effective enough in improving standards at the end of Year 2 to halt the downward trend of pupils reaching the expected

p.7

Grade: 3

level in reading, writing and mathematics. The governing body is satisfactory. It is well organised with a good committee structure. Governors are supportive of the school's work and are beginning to gain a better knowledge of the school's strengths and its areas for development. They review the progress of the improvement plan through committee processes and so keep abreast of developments. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: St Paul's with St Michael's Primary School, 21 °22 November 2006 .

p.7

Grade: 3

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: St Paul's with St Michael's Primary School, 21 °22 November 2006

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: St Paul's with St Michael's Primary School, 21 °22 November 2006

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: St Paul's with St Michael's Primary School, 21 °22 November 2006

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for your very warm welcome when we visited your school and for talking to us about your work and what you do. We very much enjoyed our visit. Your school is a happy one and you enjoy coming to it. Your attendance is better than in most schools. Your behaviour and interest in school are good. You understand clearly the importance of keeping yourselves safe and how to live healthily. You take a good interest in the area around you. We were interested to learn of your ideas for Haggerston Park. The staff take very good care of you. The school provides a satisfactory education for you. Children make good progress in the Nursery and Reception classes where those who do not speak much English when they first begin school quickly learn to speak it. In the school as a whole, some lessons are good and some satisfactory. We would like more lessons to be good. Sometimes the work is not difficult enough for those of you who find learning easier than other pupils do. You make satisfactory

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

progress in the main, and some of you make good progress in reaching the levels that you do. Some pupils in Years 1 and 2 could make better progress in reading, writing and mathematics. The range of work that you do in class is satisfactory. You clearly enjoy the extra opportunities that the staff kindly offer you after school and you take part in these enthusiastically. We were particularly interested in the tennis coaching you receive from Year 1 upwards. The headteacher and senior staff work hard to make school life interesting and they help new teachers who join the school to settle in quickly and to know the school's routines. We feel that the senior staff and subject leaders now need to concentrate on the progress of those of you in Years 1 and 2 so that you produce better work. Some of you can help in this by trying even harder. We wish you all well for the future and hope that you will work hard to achieve your ambitions.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

With very best wishes, Mr P Sudworth (Lead inspector) 11 of 11 Inspection Report: St Paul's with St Michael's Primary School, 21 °22 November 2006

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion