Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Benthal Primary School

Inspected 15 Jun 2006 · published 4 Jul 2006 · URN 100260

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Derek Watts

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jun 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Derek Watts

  • Postcode verified

    N16 7AU

  • Name on report verified

    Benthal Junior School

  • URN verified

    100260

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+86Very positivemore positive than 79% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyoutstandingstrongenjoyvery wellextremelywell plannedhigh quality
Criticismshortcomingsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings311w−21
  • What needs to improve949w+91

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,233
shorter than usual (typical 2508)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 25%What needs to improve 75%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

100260 Unique Reference Number Hackney Local Authority 276278 Inspection number 14 °15 June 2006 Inspection dates Derek Watts Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Junior Type of school Community School category 7 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll School

p.1

The governing body Appropriate authority Mr John Kimbell Chair Ms Sarah Thompson (Acting Headteacher) Not previously inspected Date of previous school inspection Benthal Road School address London N16 7AU

p.1

020 8985 6701 Telephone number 020 8985 8526 Fax number

p.1

7 °11 Age group 14 °15 June 2006 Inspection dates 276278 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Benthal is an average size junior school. Pupils come from a wide range of ethnic backgrounds with Black African, Caribbean, Indian and White British being the largest groups. Nearly two-thirds of the pupils have English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties is broadly average. The percentage of pupils eligible for free school meals is well above average. Pupils' attainment on entry to the school is below average. Since September 2005, the school has been led by an acting headteacher. Benthal Junior will amalgamate with the adjoining infant school in September 2006.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 7 Inspection Report: Benthal Junior School, 14 °15 June 2006

p.3

What the school should do to improve further

• Encourage pupils to use their initiative in organising and presenting their own work by placing less reliance on worksheets.

p.4

Grade:

Teaching and learning are good overall with some outstanding elements. Teachers have very good relationships with pupils and plan lessons effectively. Expectations of behaviour and learning are generally high and pupils' respond well to these. Teachers use questioning effectively to challenge pupils' thinking and check their understanding. Tasks are mostly matched to pupils' abilities and needs so they are suitably challenged and this helps them to become productive learners. Learning assistants are briefed fully and provide effective support particularly to pupils with learning difficulties. Individual educational plans are used well to guide pupils' learning. Pupils with English as an additional language receive good support in developing their language skills. As a result of this support, all pupils have full access to activities and progress well. There are good opportunities for pupils to discuss work in pairs and this extends their speaking and

p.4

Grade:

listening skills effectively. Investigative skills are taught extremely well. For example, in a Year 6 science lesson, pupils applied observation and analysing skills well when comparing and matching different powders from a fictional crime scene. Visiting specialist teachers of music, environmental science and literacy enhance the school's good teaching and contribute well to pupils learning and enjoyment. Despite the numerous strengths in the teaching, there are some shortcomings. On occasions, there is an over-reliance on worksheets. This hampers pupils in organising and presenting their own work. Also, the expectations, pace and challenge are not as high in a Year 4 class and this slows pupils' rate of learning. Assessment is good because the data is used well to plan teaching and to set challenging learning targets for pupils. The marking of pupils' work is generally good as it identifies why a

p.4

Grade:

piece of work is good and provides guidance on how to improve.

p.4

Grade:

The school's curriculum is good. It is stimulating, well planned and enables all groups of pupils to achieve well and contributes significantly to their good personal development. There are good additional programmes for literacy and numeracy to help pupils who need them. The strong emphasis on problem solving and investigative work in mathematics and science leads 4 of 7 Inspection Report: Benthal Junior School, 14 °15 June 2006 to outstanding achievement in these areas. The computer suite is being used effectively to develop pupils' ICT skills. Exciting initiatives to challenge gifted and talented pupils have been introduced. For example, a small group of mixed aged pupils explored the characters and the play script of Shakespeare's 'Hamlet'. They expressed their ideas and views articulately. Important areas such as promoting healthy lifestyles and personal safety receive good attention. The lack

p.4

Grade:

of easy access to grass areas and to swimming facilities sometimes limits the range of physical education (PE) activities. A good range of extra-curricular activities and interesting visits enriches the curriculum. The performing arts is a strong feature of the curriculum with productions such as 'The Little Match Girl' and 'Bugsy Malone' presented this year. Pupils' displayed art work in the style of Matisse, Lowery and Klee is of a high quality. However, the external fabric of the building is shabby and does not reflect the vibrant work within the school.

p.5

Grade:

Pupils are provided with good care, guidance and support. Within a positive and welcoming atmosphere, pupils feel safe and know that there is always someone they can go to if they have problems. Child protection and health and safety procedures are robust and ensure pupils' safety. Bullying is rare and is handled swiftly and effectively. Academic support and guidance are good. There are clear systems to track pupils' progress. Recently introduced target setting is helping pupils to see how well they are doing and what they need to do next to improve. Good relationships with the adjoining infant school help to ensure that pupils settle quickly into the juniors. Parents feel confident that this is a caring and supportive school. As one parent wrote, 'The school's ethos is very child-centered and makes children feel secure. This enables them to develop educationally.'

p.5

Grade:

5 of 7 Inspection Report: Benthal Junior School, 14 °15 June 2006 .

p.5

Grade:

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 7 Inspection Report: Benthal Junior School, 14 °15 June 2006

p.6

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Pupils Thank you so much for welcoming us into your school and showing us your work. We enjoyed our visit and would like to tell you what we found out. Benthal Junior is a good school and one you can be proud of. These things were particularly pleasing:* You clearly enjoy school and the activities offered.* Teaching is good and learning support assistants help you. * You are all making good progress. Your progress is particularly good in mathematics and science. * Your artwork and performances in productions are impressive.* Your behaviour is good and you are friendly and polite. * You get on well with other pupils and adults.* Your headteacher leads the school very well. She receives good support from the deputy headteacher and other staff. * Your parents are pleased with the school and give it good support. * There is a good range of clubs and visits, which you clearly enjoy. There is one important thing that we think could be improved:* Sometimes your teachers could

p.7

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

encourage you to plan and organise your own work rather than providing you with worksheets. Finally, thank you once again for all your help. We wish you all the best for the future. With kind regards Derek Watts and Jane Chesterfield Inspection Team 7 of 7 Inspection Report: Benthal Junior School, 14 °15 June 2006

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion