Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Randal Cremer Primary School

Inspected 5 May 2006 · published 24 May 2006 · URN 100236

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Howe

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 May 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Howe

  • Postcode verified

    E2 8JG

  • Name on report verified

    Randal Cremer Primary School

  • URN verified

    100236

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+7Mostly positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelycaringhigh qualitymake good progressconsistentlyeffectivesupportivepositive
Criticismnot alwayslacksweakerconcernvariablemissednot yetlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings343w−20
  • What needs to improve932w+9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,244
shorter than usual (typical 2508)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 27%What needs to improve 73%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Randal Cremer Primary School Inspection report

p.1

100236 Unique Reference Number Hackney Local Authority 276274 Inspection number 4 °5 May 2006 Inspection dates Andrew Howe Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll School

p.1

The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Nick Morris Chair Mrs Valerie Serrette-Figaro Not previously inspected Date of previous school inspection Ormsby Street School address Shoreditch London E2 8JG

p.1

020 7739 8162 Telephone number 020 7729 5807 Fax number

p.1

3 °11 Age group 4 °5 May 2006 Inspection dates 276274 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This larger-than-average primary school serves an area of high deprivation in East London. About half the pupils are entitled to free school meals. About four fifths of the pupils are from minority ethnic groups, about a quarter coming from Black African backgrounds in particular. Nearly half of pupils are in the early stages of learning English. Over a quarter of the pupils have learning difficulties. The proportion of pupils who enter and leave the school other than at the usual times is above average. The school roll is increasing, resulting in some re-organisation of classes. There have been several changes of leadership since the last inspection and the current headteacher and deputy headteacher have been in post for less than two years.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 7 Inspection Report: Randal Cremer Primary School, 4 °5 May 2006

p.3

What the school should do to improve further

• Improve the quality of teaching so that it is consistently good and promotes better pupil progress. • Review and develop the curriculum so that it is more exciting and relevant. • Develop the role of the governing body so that they play a full part in evaluating the school's performance and planning for the future.

p.4

Grade:

Teaching and learning are satisfactory. Some lessons are good. Teachers assess and track pupils' progress effectively, particularly in English and mathematics and in the Foundation Stage and so they know pupils' capabilities well. However, they do not always use this information to match work to pupils' needs in lessons. Teachers use technology well in presenting lessons. For example, it was used very effectively in a Year 1 mathematics lesson when pupils were being taught how to add on nine, so that the pupils grasped the concept quickly. Pupils' behaviour is managed well. Marking is variable in quality and some books are not marked regularly enough. Teachers do not always set high enough expectations for pupils' presentation of their work. The teaching of pupils with learning difficulties is satisfactory. When groups of pupils have adult support, it is often effective, both for pupils at an early stage of learning English and

p.4

Grade:

where additional one-to-one reading lessons are provided.

p.4

Grade:

The curriculum is satisfactory, broad and balanced. However, it sometimes lacks relevance and excitement. For instance, links between subjects that would make learning stimulating and more appropriate to each pupils' needs are still developing. In Year 2 pupils could contrast their own locality with the seaside using photographs from the Internet, but in another lesson opportunities to link Information and Communication Technology (ICT) with mathematics were missed. Science has been a weaker element of the curriculum, but there is now an improvement in investigative work. Visits are used purposefully to enhance pupils' learning and visitors, such as theatre groups, make good contributions to pupils' learning. Personal, social and health education receives a good emphasis. There is a satisfactory range of extra-curricular activities. Good arrangements are made for pupils at a very early stage of learning English. Provision for

p.4

Grade:

pupils with learning difficulties is satisfactory. Although useful interventions help pupils in small groups for literacy, they sometimes mean pupils miss important learning in other key lessons. 4 of 7 Inspection Report: Randal Cremer Primary School, 4 °5 May 2006

p.4

Grade:

Each child is treated as an individual and supported well by the high quality, caring relationships that exist throughout the school. These make an important contribution to the good quality support, care and guidance for pupils. All health and safety issues are addressed; risk assessments are in place and child protection procedures are well established. Satisfactory assessment procedures are in place and pupils giving cause for concern are monitored carefully. Staff set targets for individual pupils and for groups and track each child's progress rigorously. However, this information is not yet used consistently in lesson planning to ensure all pupils are appropriately challenged. The school works hard to ensure that barriers to learning such as limited English skills are removed wherever possible and uses additional support well. Activities such as booster classes and one-one work with the learning mentor have assisted many children

p.5

Grade:

in improving basic skills. The school has placed great emphasis on building a supportive relationship with families and this has had a positive impact, reducing absence and lateness.

p.5

Grade:

5 of 7 Inspection Report: Randal Cremer Primary School, 4 °5 May 2006 .

p.5

Grade:

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 7 Inspection Report: Randal Cremer Primary School, 4 °5 May 2006

p.6

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Pupils Thank you for sharing your views of the school with us when we visited a little while ago. We enjoyed our time with you, and we promised to let you know what we decided after our visit. You told us what a caring place Randal Cremer Primary School is, and how there is always someone you can go to if you have a problem. You were quite right. Teachers and helpers take good care of you, and do a great deal to help you learn and stay safe. Your school council means you can have a say in how the school runs, and it has some real improvements to show for its work.Right through from the nursery and reception classes to Year 6, children behave well. Younger children make good progress. Older children make satisfactory progress in their learning. Children who find learning hard, or who speak a language other than English at home, get good extra help. Many of the lessons we saw were satisfactory and some were good. You

p.7

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

clearly enjoyed some of them. You work hard, because teachers try to make learning fun. There are some interesting activities you can do at school outside class, such as clubs and school trips.There are some things that could be better, though:* Although teaching is satisfactory, marking and the setting of tasks that are at the right level would help you more.* Although there is a satisfactory range of subjects, the school could try to make them more interesting and enjoyable.* The school's governors could do more to check on how well everyone is doing and help the headteacher to plan for the future. Randal Cremer Primary School is a satisfactory school with some good features. If you continue to work as hard, and behave as well as you do now, it could become even better. Good wishes for the future, Andrew Howe Lead Inspector 7 of 7 Inspection Report: Randal Cremer Primary School, 4 °5 May 2006

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion