Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Morningside Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 Feb 2006
- Postcode verified
E9 6LL
- Name on report verified
Morningside Primary School
- URN verified
100232
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory. p.4
- In some lessons the pace is slow and teachers do too much talking. p.4
- As a consequence pupils lose interest and do not have enough time to get their work done. p.4
- Questioning is used to check pupils' understanding but not to deepen their thinking by requiring them to give extended answers. p.4
- Teaching is often good during literacy lessons because of the way the teaching programme is designed. p.4
- This teaching is clearly focused, with work well matched to pupils' abilities. p.4
- Activities encourage the development of good team-working skills. p.4
- Teaching in the Foundation Stage is satisfactory but activities are not always planned to suit pupils' interests or abilities. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language3
“In some lessons the pace is slow and teachers do too much talking.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,206
- shorter than usual (typical 2508)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Morningside Primary School Inspection report
p.1
100232 Unique Reference Number Hackney Local Authority 276273 Inspection number 6 °7 February 2006 Inspection dates Nicholas (Nick) Butt Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll School
p.1
The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Jim Wight Chair Mrs Jean Millham Not previously inspected Date of previous school inspection Chatham Place School address Hackney London E9 6LL
p.1
020 8985 5382 Telephone number 020 8986 6881 Fax number
p.1
3 °11 Age group 6 °7 February 2006 Inspection dates 276273 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
This large primary school serves a severely disadvantaged inner city area. Well over half the pupils receive free school meals and a third have learning difficulties. Almost two thirds of pupils speak English as an additional language, and their most common mother tongues are Turkish, Yoruba and French. The largest minority ethnic groups are Black African and Caribbean. Many pupils arrive as refugees. The school hosts a Primary Learning Support Unit. It has a breakfast club and after school clubs. It links into a Primary Leaning Network, a mini Education Action Zone and an Excellence in Cities cluster. It trains Graduate Teachers. The school's awards include Artsmark (silver) and Activemark.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 7 Inspection Report: Morningside Primary School, 6 °7 February 2006
p.3
What the school should do to improve further
* Raise standards further in English and mathematics;* Ensure that work in the Foundation Stage meets the needs of all pupils whatever their level of ability;* Improve teaching so that the majority is good or better.
p.4
Grade:
The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory. In some lessons the pace is slow and teachers do too much talking. As a consequence pupils lose interest and do not have enough time to get their work done. Questioning is used to check pupils' understanding but not to deepen their thinking by requiring them to give extended answers. Teaching is often good during literacy lessons because of the way the teaching programme is designed. This teaching is clearly focused, with work well matched to pupils' abilities. Activities encourage the development of good team-working skills. Teaching in the Foundation Stage is satisfactory but activities are not always planned to suit pupils' interests or abilities. Although interactive white-boards are now a feature of most classrooms, teachers do not make enough use of them to enliven their lessons.Teachers make effective use of assessment data to set targets for improvement. This
p.4
Grade:
helps them to be clear about the next steps in learning, especially in literacy. They make good use of teaching assistants to support pupils with learning difficulties. Pupils at the early stages of learning English are taught well and helped to participate fully in lessons.
p.4
Grade:
The curriculum is broad and fully balanced. This is a great improvement since the last inspection. Rich experiences in the arts and sport extend pupils' learning and contribute well to their cultural development. The curriculum is well planned and reviewed regularly. Pupils are given many opportunities to develop and practise their literacy skills in other subjects. The innovative programme for teaching literacy has made a real difference to pupils' enjoyment and progress. The curriculum is adapted well to meet the needs of pupils with learning difficulties. Those speaking little English are fully included with imaginative visual aids devised to support their learning. The curriculum is greatly enriched by visits, visitors and a wide range of after-school clubs. Pupils participate eagerly. Gifted and talented pupils benefit from an extended curriculum, such as making plaster sculptures of animals and birds to exhibit locally. The curriculum in the
p.4
Grade:
Foundation Stage is satisfactory but not so well geared to developing pupils' interests. 4 of 7 Inspection Report: Morningside Primary School, 6 °7 February 2006
p.4
Grade:
This is an outstanding feature of the school's provision. Pupils are nurtured and cared for extremely well, with each individual made to feel special and unique. The headteacher and her senior staff set a very good example; they are always accessible to pupils and have put excellent systems in place. There are very good procedures for the induction of the many new pupils who arrive during term time, often speaking little English. Parents mentioned their great confidence in the high quality care provided. Procedures for child protection and health and safety are very robust and regularly updated. Pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities are well supported by highly skilled teaching assistants. Improved systems ensure that teaching assistants spend more time with groups and individuals, and their work is closely monitored by the assistant heads. Links with outside agencies are very strong, which benefits the school's
p.5
Grade:
most vulnerable pupils. Pupils are given very good guidance in how to improve, including regular one-to-one tutorials for Year 6. This is helping to raise standards.
p.5
Grade:
5 of 7 Inspection Report: Morningside Primary School, 6 °7 February 2006 .
p.5
Grade:
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 7 Inspection Report: Morningside Primary School, 6 °7 February 2006
p.6
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Thank you very much for making us so welcome at your school. We enjoyed meeting you all and talking to you about your work and the things you enjoy doing. We agree that your school is a very happy place to attend, with everybody so friendly and all the different clubs you can take part in. There are lots of things we like about your school and here are some of them:* The way you look after one another in the playground and in the dining hall;* The way you work hard in lessons and try your best even when the work is difficult;* The way your reading and writing is getting better because of the groups you have for literacy;* The way the adults look after you and are always there for you if you have a problem;* The way Mrs. Millham and the other adults work so hard to make your school a fun and happy place and organise so many good things for you to do. We think there are things your teachers can do to make your lessons even better than they are
p.7
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
now. We think it would be helpful for the children in the reception classes to have work that is just right for them. We are pleased with the progress you are making in English and mathematics and expect that you will do even better in the future. We know your teachers are showing you how to improve and will value your own thoughts about how well you are doing.Thank you once again for such a warm welcome. We did enjoy visiting your school and we will have very fond memories of our time with you. 7 of 7 Inspection Report: Morningside Primary School, 6 °7 February 2006
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion