Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Gordon Primary School

Inspected 7 Mar 2007 · published 23 Mar 2007 · URN 100127

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Jacqueline Krafft

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Mar 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jacqueline Krafft

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    SE9 1QG

  • Name on report verified

    Gordon Primary School

  • URN verified

    100127

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+36Positivemore positive than 17% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresseffectivelyexceptionallypositiveenjoycaringconfidentenjoyment
Criticisminconsistenciesnot yetnot alwayslackinadequatenot consistentlybelowconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1371w+36
  • What needs to improve903w+35

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,243
shorter than usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%What needs to improve 39%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

100127 Unique Reference Number Greenwich Local Authority 276254 Inspection number 6 °7 March 2007 Inspection dates Jacqueline Krafft HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 464 School

p.1

The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Steven Mann Chair Mr John McKinlay Headteacher 18 October 1999 Date of previous school inspection Grangehill Road School address Eltham London SE9 1QG

p.1

020 8850 5486 Telephone number 020 8859 1673 Fax number

p.1

3 °11 Age group 6 °7 March 2007 Inspection dates 276254 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Gordon is a larger than average primary school with a nursery. The large majority of pupils are of White British heritage. The percentage of pupils from minority ethnic groups, who speak English as an additional language or who are eligible for free school meals, is below average. The number of pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities is increasing but is similar to most other schools. The school has undergone major refurbishment recently and has a new sports centre.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 10 Inspection Report: Gordon Primary School, 6 °7 March 2007

p.3

Grade: 3

Gordon is a calm, caring school that provides its pupils with a satisfactory standard of education. The good personal development and well-being of pupils and the parental support of the school are key factors in maintaining the high standards pupils reach by the time leave at the end of Year 6. Pupils attend regularly, behave well and have good attitudes to learning. They like lessons which give them the opportunities to work together in groups but say this does not happen often enough. They are confident, articulate and respond well to the adults in school because relationships are good. They know who they can talk to if they are worried about anything and particularly value the 'Listening Ear' facility available at lunchtime and say they wish it was available at playtimes too. Pupils are well cared for and their pastoral needs are met effectively. When pupils start school they have the skills and knowledge expected of their age. They make

p.4

Grade: 3

good progress by the end of Year 6 to reach standards that are above average but progress is uneven and varies from class to class. This is because, although satisfactory overall, there are inconsistencies in the quality of teaching and learning and tasks are not always differentiated to carefully match pupils' different learning needs. As a result some pupils do not have a clear understanding of how well they are doing and what they need to do to improve. Inconsistencies have been compounded by high levels of staff turnover and changes to the leadership team in the past few years. A minority of parents express concern about these inconsistencies and the lack of challenge for some of the more able pupils. The use of assessment information and systematic tracking of the progress pupils make is in its early stages of development. It is not yet being used rigorously to evaluate the impact of changes that are being made. For example, the curriculum is satisfactory and promotes pupils'

p.4

Grade: 3

personal development and enjoyment, particularly through the good range of regular visits and residential trips. However, it does not build consistently on what pupils already know, so rates of progress vary. The planning of some specialist teaching, such as music, disrupts the delivery of some other subjects. The school's self-evaluation involves governors and senior leaders appropriately. It honestly and accurately recognises the need to address the inconsistencies in the quality of provision. Changes have been made to the leadership team and the team is not yet complete. Some members are still developing the skills they need to set a clear, shared direction for improvement which promotes a whole school approach to good quality teaching and learning. Local authority support and changes to the Foundation Stage team have had a positive impact on improving the quality and provision in the Foundation Stage which is now satisfactory. This improvement

p.4

Grade: 3

demonstrates that the school has satisfactory capacity to improve further.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Improve the skills of the leadership team in setting a clear direction for improvement. • Develop a consistent approach to good quality teaching and learning. • Use assessment information and pupil tracking data rigorously to improve and evaluate the quality of provision. 4 of 10 Inspection Report: Gordon Primary School, 6 °7 March 2007

p.4

Grade: 2

As a result of improving teachers' skills and appropriate use of tracking information to plan activities, pupils make satisfactory progress in the Foundation Stage. They reach the levels expected by the time they enter Year 1. Pupils make satisfactory progress and reach average standards by the end of Year 2, although rates of progress vary and few pupils reach the highest levels in writing and mathematics. By the end of Year 6 all groups of pupils, including those with learning difficulties and disabilities, make equally good progress to reach high standards. This is because they are confident, have very good attitudes to learning and are provided with interesting activities which motivate them. As a result appropriately challenging targets are generally met in Year 6 but expectations throughout the school, especially of the more able are inconsistent.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils' personal development and well-being are good. Their behaviour in classrooms and elsewhere in the school is good. They enjoy good relationships and are respectful of their teachers and one another. Their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good and is particularly enhanced through art and music. As one parent put it: 'Gordon children are accepting of each other'. They show a good understanding of healthy living, and participate enthusiastically in a variety of physical education and sporting activities. Pupils say they feel safe at school as a result of the caring approach of adults. They show enjoyment through attentiveness and positive attitudes. They make a satisfactory contribution to the school community through the school council and raise money for various charities. Skills and achievement in literacy, numeracy, and the positive qualities which pupils show in lessons,

p.5

Grade: 2

contribute well to their future economic well-being. Attendance is above average.

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory overall with some good lessons observed, mainly in Years 3 - 6. Good relationships, respect and rapport are evident across the school. Typically what characterises a good lesson is the high level of pupil engagement, the clarity of learning objectives and well-paced teaching. This results in good progress. However, there are inconsistencies in the quality of teaching which slow the pace of learning. Teachers do not always provide pupils with tasks that are challenging and well matched to their individual learning needs. Opportunities for pupils to develop their independence and work collaboratively are restricted by adult-directed activities. Lack of involvement in planning of all staff is a barrier to consistently good progress. As assessment and pupil-tracking processes are new teachers do not consistently build on what pupils already know and can do.

p.5

Grade: 3

The school provides a satisfactory curriculum that promotes personal development and enjoyment so pupils achieve well. There is a strong focus on promoting music and specialist 5 of 10 Inspection Report: Gordon Primary School, 6 °7 March 2007 teaching is provided across the school. However, timetabling interrupts the flow of other lessons and impacts on the provision of time for other subjects. Interactive whiteboards are available in most classrooms and teachers are learning how to use them effectively. Planning for pupils identified as more able is not consistent and they are not challenged to apply their learning, particularly in Years 1 and 2. There is a good range of visits and extra-curricular activities to support the curriculum and pupils enjoy enrichment experiences such as the Science Week, described by one parent as 'fantastic!'

p.5

Grade: 3

The school looks after its pupils satisfactorily. Pupils appreciate the 'Listening Ear' and the opportunities it gives them to talk to someone. Procedures to safeguard and secure the health, safety and protection of pupils are effective and there are appropriate links with outside agencies to support pupils' welfare. Individual Education Plans for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are in place and are used to target additional support but the school is aware that they are not reviewed frequently enough or used sufficiently within teaching plans. Individual curriculum targets are set but vary across the school and not all pupils are given a clear guidance on what they need to do next to improve.

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory. The headteacher and governors have a clear understanding of the school's strengths and what needs to be improved. Membership of the senior leadership team has recently been expanded but is not yet complete and so management structures and leadership skills are not sufficiently well developed to make a consistent impact on improving the quality of provision. A cycle of activities to monitor the quality of teaching and of the curriculum is in place, but how the outcomes are used to shape the direction of whole-school improvement planning is not yet fully understood by all leaders. Governors make a good contribution to leadership by challenging and supporting the school well. The school offers satisfactory value for money. 6 of 10 Inspection Report: Gordon Primary School, 6 °7 March 2007 .

p.6

Grade: 3

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 of 10 Inspection Report: Gordon Primary School, 6 °7 March 2007

p.7

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.8

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.8

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.8

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.8

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.8

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 8 of 10 Inspection Report: Gordon Primary School, 6 °7 March 2007

p.8

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 9 of 10 Inspection Report: Gordon Primary School, 6 °7 March 2007

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for making us feel so welcome when we visited your school recently. We especially enjoyed looking at your work, seeing you in lessons and talking with so many of you. You were very confident and told us what you thought very clearly. You and your parents like your school. You trust and respect the adults and you told us you know who to ask for help if you need it. You value the opportunity to talk things over when you need to in the 'Listening Ear' and wish it could be available at playtimes too. You behave well, work hard and particularly enjoy the many trips you go on. You really enjoyed science week, especially when some of you were lucky enough to see a chicken lay an egg. Your headteacher and teachers have made your school a calm, caring place and you get a satisfactory education. To make it even better, we have asked them to help you make equally good progress as you go from class to class by checking on how well you are doing and making

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

sure all the lessons are as good as each other. Thank you again for making us so welcome and we hope that you carry on working hard and enjoying being at school. With very best wishes Jackie KrafftHer Majesty's Inspector 10 of 10 Inspection Report: Gordon Primary School, 6 °7 March 2007

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion