Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Netley Primary School

Inspected 14 Oct 2005 · published 2 Feb 2006 · URN 100018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Oct 2005

  • Postcode verified

    NW1 3EN

  • Name on report verified

    Netley Primary School

  • URN verified

    100018

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−3Mixedmore positive than 7% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiserobustenjoyoutstandingvery highstrongeffectivesuccessfulwarm
Criticismnot alwaysweaknessesinconsistenciesnot consistentlyinsufficientdelaysnot rigorousnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings312w+25
  • What needs to improve838w−7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,119
shorter than usual (typical 2508)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 27%What needs to improve 72%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

100018 Unique Reference Number Camden Local Authority 276234 Inspection number 13 °14 October 2005 Inspection dates Nicholas (Nick) Butt Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll School

p.1

The governing body Appropriate authority Mr John White Chair Mrs Judith Evans Not previously inspected Date of previous school inspection 30 William Road School address London NW1 3EN

p.1

0207 3876601 Telephone number 0207 3871117 Fax number

p.1

3 °11 Age group 13 °14 October 2005 Inspection dates 276234 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

The school serves an inner-city area with a very high proportion of pupils whose first language is not English (87%). More than half its pupils are eligible for free school meals. The largest minority ethnic group is Bangladeshi; there are also many Albanian and Somali pupils. More than one fifth of pupils are refugees or asylum seekers. The proportion of pupils on the special needs register is average, but there are twice as many pupils with statements, mainly because the school has a 14-place resource base for pupils with autistic spectrum disorders. There is high mobility in Year 6.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 7 Inspection Report: Netley Primary School, 13 °14 October 2005

p.3

What the school should do to improve further

* Raise standards in English and science so that all groups of pupils, including those who are more able, make appropriate progress;* Develop an efficient and robust senior management team to decisively tackle the weaknesses in teaching, especially in Years 1 and 2, and of those whose first language is not English or who have learning difficulties.* The governing body must hold the school fully to account.

p.4

Grade:

The school correctly judges teaching and learning as satisfactory overall. The quality varies across the school and between classes. Teachers' use of assessment information to improve learning differs widely. Because monitoring by leaders is not rigorous or systematic enough these inconsistencies are often not dealt with. Partnership teaching works well in the classes, where it operates, which helps pupils with English as an additional language. This does not happen, however, in the younger year groups, where more pupils are at the earliest stages of learning the language. Teaching assistants, including those who are bilingual, provide good support. Teaching of phonic skills is increasingly effective. In some classes work is not well matched to pupils' abilities. This is because teachers do not assess performance well enough, and do not consistently plan for different groups. It is not always clear to pupils what they are

p.4

Grade:

The school's curriculum is satisfactory. In the nursery and reception classes a reasonable range of activities is planned and provided for children. There are some good activities to develop language skills. Planning does not always take account of the children's different needs. The curriculum for pupils in Years 1 to 6 meets requirements. The school is currently promoting science investigations, and more use of ICT in other subjects. There are good opportunities to learn musical instruments such as the guitar, violin and cello. Pupils enjoy a wide range of visits and join several clubs. For example, a class of Year 1 pupils went to the Science Museum to study materials. The curriculum supports Every Child Matters outcomes well in healthy living and staying safe. There was a successful 'Health Week' that included activities such as safer cycling, teeth care, fire safety and exercising. 4 of 7 Inspection Report: Netley Primary School, 13 °14 October 2005

p.4

Grade:

The school judged care as outstanding but gave no evidence to explain it. While pastoral care is strong, there are weaknesses in the academic guidance and support for many pupils. Inspection findings indicate satisfactory provision overall. Parents find school staff friendly and approachable. The school communicates well with them, an improvement since the last inspection. There are good links with outside groups, such as the family learning resource centre. Child protection procedures are robust and staff receive appropriate training. Support for pupils at an early stage of English language acquisition is insufficient. Systems for assessing pupils' progress and needs are not well established. In particular, pupils with learning and behavioural difficulties are not always identified early enough and so there can be delays in them receiving the support they need.

p.5

Grade:

5 of 7 Inspection Report: Netley Primary School, 13 °14 October 2005 .

p.5

Grade:

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 7 Inspection Report: Netley Primary School, 13 °14 October 2005

p.6

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for the warm welcome you gave us when we visited your school. It was lovely meeting you and we are glad you had so much to tell us. I am writing to you now to tell you what we found out about your school. These are the things that we especially like:* The way you run a healthy fruit stall and the early morning breakfast club.* The sensible way you vote to elect new members of your school council.* The different clubs and visits you enjoy and the opportunities you have to learn musical instruments.* You feel safe at school and well looked after, and you know you can go to an adult if you feel worried about anything, who will listen to you and help. We are pleased you have felt able to tell Mrs. Evans the toilets need improving, and that she has already done something about it. We know she is very interested in your ideas about how to make school dinners even tastier. We felt that while some of your lessons are fun and

p.7

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

interesting, it is not always like that. We have told your teachers to make sure that the work is just right for you and to explain to you clearly how well you are doing. We know your teachers will want to involve you more in doing better with your reading and writing. We have asked Mrs. Evans and Mr. Hook to visit your classes more often to check how well you are learning. Another team of inspectors will come back to your school in a year's time to see how things have changed.We are glad that you are happy at school, and thank you once again for making us feel so welcome. 7 of 7 Inspection Report: Netley Primary School, 13 °14 October 2005

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion