Other · Ofsted report
Simonside Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 Nov 2004
- Postcode verified
NE5 4LG
- Name on report verified
Simonside Primary School
- URN verified
108454
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The staff are caring and supportive, particularly of disadvantaged children and those with SEN, and the school has excellent links with other schools and the community. p.3
- Teaching is effective and often very effective. p.3
- Children make an excellent start in the Foundation Stage and all achieve well throughout the school. p.3
- Assemblies are effective in promoting moral messages and have strong spiritual elements. p.5
- The new interactive whiteboards are proving very effective. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school has made good progress since the last inspection. p.3
- It was very effective as a first school and no key areas were identified for improvement. p.3
- Standards have been maintained in the infants, and the school has made good progress in providing for the older children in Years 5 and 6. p.3
- There have been clear improvements, for example the school is open and welcoming of parents and pupils’ views, and teachers plan for, and measure, pupils’ progress more carefully. p.3
- Teamwork amongst staff is exceptionally strong. p.3
- The school is well equipped to improve even further. p.3
- There is no complacency within the leadership and management. p.3
- The headteacher and senior staff know the school’s strengths and weaker points very well, and identified them accurately in the school’s self-evaluation. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment16
“Teaching is effective and often very effective.” p.3Parents & families6
“The partnership with parents is strong.” p.6
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,966
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group Published Reference no. Inspection report Simonside Primary School
p.1
Unique Reference Number 108454 LEA Newcastle Upon Tyne
p.1
Inspection number 269347 Inspection dates 23 – 25 November 2004 Reporting inspector Brian Padgett HMI
p.1
Inspection carried out under section 3 of the School Inspections Act 1996, and was deemed section 10 under the same act.
p.1
Type of School Primary School School address School category Community Age range of pupils 3 – 11 Bedeburn Road Westerhope Newcastle upon Tyne NE5 4LG Gender of pupils Mixed Telephone number 0191 2860776 Number on roll 298 Fax number 0191 2716790 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair of governors Date of previous inspection March 1999 Headteacher Ms Kath Held
p.1
3 - 11 December 2004 269347 This report may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced verbatim without adaptation and on condition that the source and date thereof are stated.
p.1
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the School Inspections Act 1996, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was a pilot of the new arrangements for inspection announced by Ofsted in its consultation paper of February 2004. It was carried out with the support and co- operation of the staff of Simonside Primary School and of the local education authority. The inspection was led by an HMI with a team of two inspectors and an independent lay inspector.
p.2
Description of the school
The school is situated in the Newbiggin Hall Estate, north west of Newcastle. About a half of the children have a free school meal, which is a very high proportion. Nearly all are white British, with just a few children from ethnic minorities, who have English as an additional language. Three year-olds entering the nursery have levels of skills and knowledge that are well below average, especially in language and in their social development. About one in every five children has special educational needs (SEN). They have a range of learning difficulties, including problems with behaviour.
p.2
Description of the school
The school was a first school originally, educating children to Year 4. It became a full primary school in 2002. It is part of a cluster of local schools that receives extra funding through the government’s Excellence in Cities initiative.
p.2
Key for inspection grades
Grade 1 Outstanding Grade 2 Good Grade 3 Satisfactory Grade 4 Inadequate
p.2
Overall effectiveness of the school
This is a good school with several outstanding features. Teaching is effective and often very effective. Children make an excellent start in the Foundation Stage and all achieve well throughout the school. Children’s personal development is good and the vast majority develop good attitudes to learning. The staff are caring and supportive, particularly of disadvantaged children and those with SEN, and the school has excellent links with other schools and the community. The school is well led. The headteacher checks children’s progress rigorously and has a very accurate view of the school’s performance. It provides good value for money.
p.3
Improvement since the last inspection
The school has made good progress since the last inspection. It was very effective as a first school and no key areas were identified for improvement. Standards have been maintained in the infants, and the school has made good progress in providing for the older children in Years 5 and 6. There have been clear improvements, for example the school is open and welcoming of parents and pupils’ views, and teachers plan for, and measure, pupils’ progress more carefully. Teamwork amongst staff is exceptionally strong.
p.3
Capacity to improve
The school is well equipped to improve even further. There is no complacency within the leadership and management. The headteacher and senior staff know the school’s strengths and weaker points very well, and identified them accurately in the school’s self-evaluation. They have high expectations and seek out areas for further development. Staff are committed and hard working, and the school makes very good use of partnerships outside the school to provide additional resources and opportunities for children.
p.3
What the school should do to improve further
T he school should continue to implement its plans to:
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• raise standards by the end of Key Stage 2 by improving provision for children in Years 5 and 6, listening to their views and, where appropriate, acting on them;
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• provide a broader range of extra curricular activities, especially sport, across the school; and
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• develop provision for the more able children.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
All of these points are identified in the school’s existing improvement plan, and are currently being implemented.
p.4
Achievement and standards
Children consistently reach average standards at Year 2, and this represents good and sometimes very good achievement for most. Very good progress is made by children in the Foundation Stage: in learning basic skills; in social skills; and in settling down to work. By the end of Year 2, children achieve much better than their counterparts in other schools in similar circumstances. Achievement at Year 6 is at least as good as in most similar schools, although standards are well below average. Standards are lower than those seen nationally because few children achieve the higher level. Results of national tests vary from year to year, and there is little difference between the achievement of boys and girls. Children with SEN do well because teachers plan appropriate work for them, and they often have special help in lessons.
p.4
Personal development and well-being
Children’s personal development is good, and this helps them to lay secure foundations for the next part of their education and for life beyond school. Most children develop very good relationships with the staff and with other children. Their attitudes to learning and their behaviour are often very good and they work hard in lessons. They particularly enjoy lessons that involve the interactive whiteboards, and they enjoy lessons in history and music. The great majority of children are polite and friendly. They are keen to take responsibility and, as well as undertaking jobs around the school, they make a positive contribution to the development of the school through the school council. They work successfully as “buddies”, helping children who feel left out. Attitudes fall off slightly with older children in Years 5 and 6; a factor known to the school. A small minority of older children have poorer attitudes, because they are more aware of their rights than their
p.4
Personal development and well-being
responsibilities. Some children have behavioural SEN. They make good progress overall, and benefit from the care they receive and the close partnership between school, support agencies and home.
p.5
Personal development and well-being
The children know about what constitutes a healthy lifestyle. They eat fruit snacks at break, and enjoy physical education (PE), including keep-fit lessons for the older children. They are keen to have more opportunities to take part in competitive sport. However, although their knowledge is developing, much of what is eaten at school, for example, in packed lunches, indicates that their practice in eating healthily lags behind their awareness of what is good for them. Attendance is below average. However, there are few unauthorised absences, and there are rigorous systems for promoting attendance and punctuality.
p.5
Personal development and well-being
Children’s spiritual, social, moral and cultural development is good. They are growing in confidence, self-esteem, and respect for the views of others. Assemblies are effective in promoting moral messages and have strong spiritual elements. Children’s moral and social development is good, as they respond to the example set by the teachers and support staff. Children’s knowledge and understanding of their own culture and those of others is good, and is celebrated in many displays around the school.
p.5
Teaching and learning
Teaching and learning are good, and often very good. Very good relationships between teachers, teaching assistants and children underpin the teaching and learning. Teachers are hard-working and very committed to the children and the school. They have good subject knowledge, particularly in teaching the basic skills; they plan well and check up rigorously on how well children have learned. In learning basic skills, children work to targets that are regularly reviewed. Every effort is made to make learning interesting and relevant. The new interactive whiteboards are proving very effective. In music, PE and history children really enjoy their learning. An important element of some of the best teaching is the effectiveness with which teachers and teaching assistants work together. This enables children to make very good progress, especially where the range of ability is very wide. Teaching assistants
p.5
Teaching and learning
and support staff are well briefed, particularly when they work with pupils with SEN. The identification of children with additional learning needs occurs early in children’s school life, and their progress is rigorously checked and reviewed.
p.5
Curriculum and other activities
The curriculum is good, and all children experience a broad range of relevant activities. The Foundation Stage provides a rich environment where children learn through play and where each child’s needs and progress are meticulously planned for and met. The emphasis in the main school is, appropriately, on literacy and numeracy, and fulfilling the requirements of the National Curriculum, but the school also takes pupils on a wide range of visits, and frequently invites visitors into school to make learning more relevant and interesting. The school is actively seeking to raise standards by developing the curriculum, for example, through the increasing use of information and communication technology (ICT), and by developing the creative and physical curriculum, to increase motivation. The range of extra curricular activities is quite limited at present, particularly for the older children, but plans are in place to improve this situation.
p.6
Care, guidance and support
The quality of care, guidance and support for pupils is good. Parents are quick to praise the school in this respect, and the vast majority of children believe they are well cared for. Care extends effectively for the physical wellbeing and safety of children, and the educational progress they make. The school has a welcoming and family ethos. The headteacher and special needs co-ordinator liaise closely with a range of service providers to ensure the care and support of vulnerable children, work with attendance officers being a good example. Guidance for learning is good within the school, and marking of children’s work is improving as it is a current focus for development. The giving of homework is less consistent, and parents of older pupils were less satisfied with this aspect of the home-school partnership.
p.6
Leadership and management
The leadership and management of the school are good, with some very good features. The headteacher and senior management team have the children’s academic achievement and personal development at heart, and these priorities are clearly shared by teachers and support staff, so that the staff as a whole has a unified sense of commitment to all the pupils. The senior team is particularly effective in involving and working with other partners, such as the local authority, and other schools and agencies, to ensure the inclusion of all children. The partnership with parents is strong. The school actively seeks the involvement of parents, for example through family learning initiatives, and as a consequence of its close involvement with parents, the school is fully rooted in its community. The headteacher has developed rigorous systems for tracking children’s performance. She has a very good grasp of how well the school is doing, and this enabled her and the staff to put together a very
p.6
Leadership and management
accurate evaluation of the school’s performance in all its aspects. Leadership and management amongst the staff are well developed. The co-ordination of SEN is very good, and subject managers play an active part in checking children’s progress and observing teaching in their subject. Curriculum leadership is good, and the school is making good progress towards ensuring that lessons are geared more closely to the needs of the children. For example, children are organised into groups according to their needs, and these groups change depending on the progress they make. Governors have been supportive of the school in the past, and have discharged their duties effectively. However, at present, the composition of the governing body is changing significantly, and important posts are unallocated. The school’s resources and their use are good, and although the school’s accommodation is only adequate, with classrooms awkwardly distributed, it is very
p.7
Leadership and management
clean and provides a stimulating learning environment.
p.7
Grade: 2
procedures set out in the leaflet 'Complaining about HMI-led Ofsted inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk.
p.8
Grade: 2
part, for non-commercial purposes, provided the source and the date are acknowledged.
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion