Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Golcar Junior Infant and Nursery School

Inspected — · published 25 Apr 2001 · URN 107696

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Strathblane House

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Strathblane House

  • URN verified

    107696

Page 1 of 17
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentvery wellstrengthsvery highvery effectiveimprovedcleargood progress
Criticismpoorunacceptableabsencenot alwaysconcernsbelowweaknessesmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1777w+68
  • What needs to improve2004w+84

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
17
Words of findings
3,722
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 43%What needs to improve 48%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

SCHOOL

Short inspection carried out under section 10 of the School Inspections Act 1996 This report may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced verbatim without adaptation and on condition that the source and date thereof are stated.

p.1

SCHOOL

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the School Inspections Act 1996, the school must provide a copy of this report and/or its summary free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 3 - January 2001

p.2

INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL

Type of school: Junior, infant and nursery school

p.3

INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL

School address: Manor Road Golcar Huddersfield West Yorkshire

p.3

INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL

Appropriate authority: The Governing Body

p.3

INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL

Name of chair of governors: Mr. J. Crossland

p.3

INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL

Date of previous inspection: September 1997 Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 4 - January 2001

p.3

Team members

23868 Dr.B. Blundell Registered inspector 9674 Mr. J. Singh Lay inspector 18618 Ms. J. Gibson Team inspector 30430 Mr. M. Hayes Team inspector

p.4

Team members

Nord Anglia School Inspection Services Strathblane House Ashfield Road Stockport Cheshire SK8 1BB

p.4

Team members

Any concerns or complaints about the inspection or the report should be raised with the inspection contractor. Complaints that are not satisfactorily resolved by the contractor should be raised with OFSTED by writing to:

p.4

Team members

The Complaints Manager Inspection Quality Division

p.4

Team members

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 5 - January 2001

p.4

PART A: SUMMARY OF THE REPORT 6

Information about the school How good the school is What the school does well What could be improved How the school has improved since its last inspection Standards Pupils’ attitudes and values Teaching and learning Other aspects of the school How well the school is led and managed Parents’ and carers’ views of the school

p.5

PART C: SCHOOL DATA AND INDICATORS 14

Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 6 - January 2001

p.6

INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL

Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School is a school for girls and boys situated in Golcar, West Yorkshire. There are currently 424 pupils on roll and this is larger than most primary schools. The percentage of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is broadly in line with the national average. There are no pupils for whom English is a second language. Whilst the proportion of pupils identified as having special educational needs is below the national average, the percentage of pupils with statements of special needs is broadly average. The nature of pupils’ special educational needs includes both moderate and severe learning problems, together with those having emotional and behavioural difficulties. The ethnic background of nearly all the pupils is white. Pupils’ attainment on entry is broadly average.

p.6

HOW GOOD THE SCHOOL IS

The overall effectiveness of the school is very good. Standards in national tests for pupils aged eleven over the last three years have been nearly half a year ahead of pupils nationally in English and mathematics and over two terms ahead in science. In the work seen during the inspection, standards in English and mathematics for pupils aged eleven were above average and in science they were well above average. The overall quality of teaching is good. Leadership and management by the headteacher and deputy headteacher are very good. The school provides very good value for money.

p.6

What the school does well

• Standards for pupils aged eleven in English, mathematics and science have been, and continue to be, above average. • The leadership and management by the headteacher and deputy headteacher body are very good. The very good assessment procedures that have been introduced ensure that the school has very clear educational direction. • The overall quality of teaching is good, with a significant proportion of it being very good. • Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour are very good. Relationships throughout the school are excellent. • Provision for pupils with special educational needs is good. • Provision for children in the foundation stage is good.

p.6

What could be improved

• The information in pupils’ reports on the foundation subjects could be greater. The areas for improvement will form the basis of the governors’ action plan.

p.6

HOW THE SCHOOL HAS IMPROVED SINCE ITS LAST INSPECTION

The school was last inspected in September 1997. Standards in English and science for pupils aged eleven have improved; in mathematics they have remained above average. The key issue relating to standards in information and communication technology has been fully addressed. The challenge to increase subject co-ordinators’ expertise and enlarge their role has been satisfactorily addressed. Lessons now begin promptly and they have efficient routines. The school has made good improvement since the last inspection. Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 7 - January 2001

p.6

STANDARDS

The table shows the standards achieved by 11 year olds based on average point scores in National Curriculum tests.

p.7

Key

English D B A A well above average above average A B mathematics C A A A average below average C D science B A A* A* well below average E

p.7

Key

Taking the three years from 1998 to 2000 averaged together, pupils aged eleven have left this school nearly one and a half terms ahead of pupils nationally in English and mathematics, and over two terms ahead in science. Results in 2000 for pupils aged eleven were well above the national average in English and mathematics, and in the top five per cent of schools nationally in science. When compared to schools having a similar proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, results in 2000 were well above average in English and mathematics, and again in the top five per cent of similar schools in science.

p.7

Key

Over the period from 1998 to 2000, standards for pupils aged seven have been nearly one term behind pupils nationally in reading, approximately the same as pupils nationally in writing and nearly half a term ahead of pupils nationally in mathematics. The school’s targets are suitably ambitious and on course to be met.

p.7

Key

Particular strengths in the standards of work seen during the inspection for pupils aged eleven, include pupils’ attainment in English and mathematics, which is above average, and their attainment in science, which is well above average. Standards in other subjects for this age group are in line with national expectations and in religious education they are in line with the requirements of the Local Agreed Syllabus. Standards for pupils aged seven are above average in reading, writing, science and mathematics. They are in line with national expectations in other subjects and meet the requirements of the local agreed syllabus in religious education.

p.7

Key

Pupils achieve appropriately taking into account their prior attainment.

p.7

Aspect Comment

Attitudes to the school Pupils’ attitudes to the school are very good. Pupils are most enthusiastic. They are cheerful, polite and friendly.

p.7

Aspect Comment

Behaviour, in and out of classrooms Pupils’ behaviour is very good. The absence of oppressive behaviour, including bullying, is excellent. No sexist or racist behaviour was observed.

p.7

Aspect Comment

Personal development and relationships Personal development and relationships are excellent.

p.7

Aspect Comment

Attendance Attendance is well above the national average. Rates of unauthorised absence are broadly in line with the national average. Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 8 - January 2001

p.7

Teaching of pupils: aged up to 5 years aged 5-7 years aged 7-11 years

Lessons seen overall Good Good Good Inspectors make judgements about teaching in the range: excellent; very good; good; satisfactory; unsatisfactory; poor; very poor. ‘Satisfactory’ means that the teaching is adequate and strengths outweigh weaknesses.

p.8

Teaching of pupils: aged up to 5 years aged 5-7 years aged 7-11 years

The overall quality of teaching is good. Overall, 9 per cent of teaching seen was excellent, 25 per cent was very good, 41 per cent was good and 25 per cent was satisfactory. In every lesson seen during the inspection, the teaching was at least satisfactory. The quality of teaching in English and mathematics is good throughout the school, and literacy and numeracy are well taught.

p.8

Teaching of pupils: aged up to 5 years aged 5-7 years aged 7-11 years

Strengths in teaching include the way in which teachers explain the learning objectives to pupils, so that pupils know exactly why they are in the lesson. These learning objectives are then carefully looked at again at the end of lessons, to see how far they have been met.

p.8

Teaching of pupils: aged up to 5 years aged 5-7 years aged 7-11 years

The school meets the needs of all pupils whatever their ethnicity. The needs of pupils with special educational needs and of those who are gifted and talented are appropriately met. Particular strengths in pupils’ learning include their interest, concentration and independence.

p.8

Aspect Comment

The quality and range of the curriculum The quality and range of the curriculum are good.

p.8

Aspect Comment

Provision for pupils with special educational needs The school’s provision for pupils with special educational needs is good.

p.8

Aspect Comment

Provision for pupils with English as an additional language Not applicable.

p.8

Aspect Comment

Provision for pupils’ personal, including spiritual, moral, social and cultural development Provision for pupils’ personal development is good. Provision for pupils’ spiritual development is satisfactory, but for their moral and social development it is very good. Provision for the pupils’ cultural development is good.

p.8

Aspect Comment

How well the school cares for its pupils The school cares for its pupils well. Assessment and its use are very good. Tracking of pupils’ academic progress is very good.

p.8

Aspect Comment

There are no weaknesses in the curricular and other opportunities offered to pupils; All areas of the curriculum meet statutory requirements. Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 9 - January 2001

p.8

Aspect Comment

Leadership and management by the headteacher and other key staff Leadership and management by the headteacher, deputy headteacher and other key staff are very good.

p.9

Aspect Comment

How well the governors fulfil their responsibilities The governing body’s fulfilment of its statutory responsibilities is very good.

p.9

Aspect Comment

The school’s evaluation of its performance The school’s evaluation of its performance is very good.

p.9

Aspect Comment

The strategic use of resources The strategic use of resources is very good.

p.9

Aspect Comment

Strengths in leadership and management include the way in which the headteacher and deputy headteacher provide clear educational direction. The school applies the principles of best value very well. The efficient running of the school and its excellent relationships are fostered throughout, by the competent administration officer, classroom support assistants, clerical staff, caretaker, cleaners and dinner ladies.

p.9

What pleases parents most What parents would like to see improved

• Their children like school. • They would feel comfortable approaching the school with any problems they may have. • Their children are making good progress. • The teaching is good. • The school expects their children to work hard. • The school is well led and managed. • Some parents would like to see a greater range of extra-curricular activities. • Some parents would like the school to work more closely with them. • Some parents would like more information as to how their children are getting on.

p.9

What pleases parents most What parents would like to see improved

The inspection team agrees with parents’ positive views; inspectors judge that the range of extra- curricular activities is satisfactory and that, overall, the school works well with parents. The information in reports about how their children are getting on in foundation subjects, however, could be greater. Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 10 - January 2001

p.9

Standards for pupils aged eleven, in English, mathematics and science, have been,

1. In the national tests for eleven year olds, between 1998 and 2000, pupils left Golcar Junior Infant and Nursery school nearly half a year ahead of pupils nationally in English and mathematics and over two terms ahead in science. Standards in 2000 were particularly good, with pupils’ attainment in English and mathematics being well above the national average and the science results being in the top five per cent of schools nationally. When compared with the performance of pupils in schools having a similar proportion known to be eligible for free school meals, standards were again well above average in English and mathematics and very high in science.

p.10

Standards for pupils aged eleven, in English, mathematics and science, have been,

2. In the work seen during the inspection for pupils aged eleven, standards in English and mathematics were found to be above average and in science they were well above average. This is despite the fact that pupils enter the school with only average levels of attainment.

p.10

Standards for pupils aged eleven, in English, mathematics and science, have been,

3. Pupils make good progress throughout the school in these subjects due to their own interest and enthusiasm and due to the good quality of the teaching.

p.10

Standards for pupils aged eleven, in English, mathematics and science, have been,

4. By the end of Year 6 in English, pupils are able to interpret poems appropriately, analysing messages, moods and feelings. They have good understanding of style and composition. Pupils are able to suggest alternative approaches in writing in order to create more interest for the person reading the poetry. They read confidently and expressively. Many are articulate, presenting good arguments, for example, when discussing gender roles in history.

p.10

Standards for pupils aged eleven, in English, mathematics and science, have been,

5. In mathematics, pupils in Year 6 competently work out equivalent fractions, decimals and percentages. They understand the importance of brackets in equations. For example, they realise that there is a difference between (9+5) x 8 and 9 + (5x8) and can work both of these out in their heads. They are good at mental mathematics and sometimes very good. Many know their times tables up to 15x15. Pupils enjoy mathematics challenges and have no fear whatsoever of large numbers. The bigger the better!

p.10

Standards for pupils aged eleven, in English, mathematics and science, have been,

6. In their science work, attainment is well above average by the end of Key Stage 2. Pupils use a variety of appropriate methods to record their findings. This makes a significant contribution to the development of literacy in the school. Year 6 pupils have a very good knowledge of key scientific vocabulary. Standards in information and communication technology have improved since the last inspection. Standards in other subjects for pupils aged eleven are in line with national expectations and in the case of religious education, they meet the needs of the Local Agreed Syllabus. Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 11 - January 2001 7. Standards in the work seen during the inspection for pupils aged seven are above national averages in reading, writing, mathematics and science and this represents an improvement. National test results for previous year groups have not always reflected this. Over the years from 1998 to 2000, reading has been just over one term behind

p.10

Standards for pupils aged eleven, in English, mathematics and science, have been,

pupils nationally, writing has been approximately in line with national standards and mathematics has been above average. The school has identified reading at Key Stage 1 as being an area for improvement and has set about tackling this vigorously.

p.11

very good. The very good assessment procedures that they have introduced ensure

that the school has very clear educational direction.

p.11

very good. The very good assessment procedures that they have introduced ensure

8. The headteacher and deputy headteacher ensure that this school has a very clear educational direction. They work hard on behalf of the staff and pupils and try, wherever possible, to have a democratic approach to what they expect staff to do. They value all staff, whatever their role, and lead by example. The leadership has embraced the spirit of inclusion within the existing positive ethos of the school. The school’s aims and values are very well reflected in its work.

p.11

very good. The very good assessment procedures that they have introduced ensure

9. The governing body is very effective in fulfilling its statutory responsibilities and brings a range of expertise to the running of this school. Its understanding of the strengths and areas of development is good overall.

p.11

very good. The very good assessment procedures that they have introduced ensure

10. The school has introduced very effective assessment procedures and track pupils’ progress very well. From the time of their assessment in the Reception class, pupils’ progress is tracked using spreadsheets and appropriate targets are set for improvement. Class targets recognise that different pupils may make different progress. Nonetheless, pupils are expected to improve their attainment by an average of two points per year. This is greater than the improvement expected nationally. Pupils’ individual record sheets contain their levels of attainment in English, mathematics and science. Older pupils are well aware of their levels of attainment and know what level they should be reaching by the time they leave the school.

p.11

very good. The very good assessment procedures that they have introduced ensure

The overall quality of teaching is good with a significant proportion being very good.

p.11

very good. The very good assessment procedures that they have introduced ensure

11. The overall quality of teaching is good throughout the school. In the lessons seen during the inspection, approximately one lesson in every ten was excellent, a quarter of lessons were very good, two fifths were good and a quarter were satisfactory. No unsatisfactory lessons were observed in any class in the school.

p.11

very good. The very good assessment procedures that they have introduced ensure

12. One of the very best features of lessons in this school is that teachers make certain that pupils know just why they are in the lesson. They do this by explaining the learning objectives for lessons, often writing these up on the board. Teachers follow this up at the end of lessons, by checking what their pupils have learned. Often, this takes the form of a question and answer session, in which pupils willingly take part. Teachers’ expectations are very high throughout. They expect pupils to work hard and behave well. The way in which teachers manage their pupils is very good. In one Year 2 lesson in which there was the merest sign of unacceptable behaviour, the teacher held up a yellow card in front of the pupil concerned. The lesson then continued without any further interruption and without a word of chastisement needing to be said. Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 12 - January 2001

p.11

very good. The very good assessment procedures that they have introduced ensure

13. In an excellent Year 6 mathematics lesson, the teacher’s planning was meticulous. Learning objectives were shared with pupils and written on the board. The lesson started with a brisk question and answer session in which the teacher held up a card, which read, for example, 40% or 1/100 or 0.25. Pupils had to volunteer equivalent values. The teacher made effective use of “Today’s Target Board”. Key mathematics vocabulary was displayed and used effectively. The teacher had very high expectations. She expected all the pupils to face her and pay attention. The pupils loved it! The effective teaching ensured that pupils made excellent progress.

p.12

very good. The very good assessment procedures that they have introduced ensure

14. The teaching was also excellent in a Year 5 mathematics lesson. Again, expectations were very high and appropriate. For example, the teacher said, “Multiply 154 by 4 in your heads”. Pupils tackled this willingly by doubling to give 308 and then doubling again to give 616. In a very good Year 2 literacy lesson, there was a purposeful learning atmosphere, created by well-established and good relationships. Learning objectives were clear, questioning was clear and there were very clear reading strategies. Children in a Reception literacy class were taught very well. The teacher made use of a very good range of attractive resources. All areas of learning were very well represented and the lesson was very well planned.

p.12

very good. The very good assessment procedures that they have introduced ensure

15. Throughout the school, the quality of support from the teaching assistants is good. They work well with the classroom teachers.

p.12

Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour are very good. Relationships throughout the school

16. Pupils are very welcoming to visitors. They went out of their way to be helpful to the inspectors, whether giving directions to classrooms or holding doors open for others. Apart from one lesson, in which pupils’ attitudes were satisfactory, they were at least good and generally very good or excellent. They are cheerful, polite and friendly.

p.12

Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour are very good. Relationships throughout the school

17. Pupils behave very well both in and out of the classrooms. During the inspection, there was an absence of racism, sexism and bullying. Relationships are excellent, both between pupils and with adults. Older pupils look after younger ones and there is a well-established “Buddy System”.

p.12

Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour are very good. Relationships throughout the school

Provision for pupils with special educational needs is good.

p.12

Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour are very good. Relationships throughout the school

18. Pupils with special educational needs make good progress throughout the school. Pupils’ individual education plans have clearly identified targets, which are measurable and up-dated every half term. Parents are kept fully informed and the special educational needs co-ordinator holds a “drop-in” session every week for parents who have any concerns.

p.12

Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour are very good. Relationships throughout the school

Provision for children in the foundation stage is good.

p.12

Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour are very good. Relationships throughout the school

19. The co-ordinator for the foundation stage is a knowledgeable and enthusiastic teacher with experience of teaching both Nursery and Reception age children. Planning procedures are very good with appropriate features as “stepping stones”. The Early Learning Goals are well covered. (The Early Learning Goals are the nationally laid down requirements for children in the foundation stage.) Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 13 - January 2001 20. There are very good assessment procedures that track children’s progress. These are used well by both the class teachers and the learning assistants. The learning environment is very stimulating, organised and clean. (The last is a feature of the whole school, which is kept immaculately clean.)

p.12

WHAT COULD BE IMPROVED

The information about foundation subjects in pupils’ reports could be greater.

p.13

WHAT COULD BE IMPROVED

21. Pupils’ reports contain detailed information on their performance in the core subjects of English, mathematics and science. Little information is provided, however, about how pupils are performing in other subjects.

p.13

WHAT SHOULD THE SCHOOL DO TO IMPROVE FURTHER?

22. In order to improve the school further, the headteacher, senior management team and governing body should improve the quality of information for parents about what their children can do in subjects other than English, mathematics and science. Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 14 - January 2001

p.13

Summary of the sources of evidence for the inspection

Number of discussions with staff, governors, other adults and pupils 14

p.14

Summary of teaching observed during the inspection

Excellent Very good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Very Poor

p.14

Summary of teaching observed during the inspection

The table gives the percentage of teaching observed in each of the seven categories used to make judgements about lessons.

p.14

Information about the school’s pupils

Pupils on the school’s roll Nursery YR – Y6

p.14

Information about the school’s pupils

Number of pupils on the school’s roll (FTE for part-time pupils) 34 357

p.14

Information about the school’s pupils

Number of full-time pupils known to be eligible for free school meals 0 42

p.14

Information about the school’s pupils

Special educational needs Nursery YR – Y6

p.14

Information about the school’s pupils

Number of pupils with statements of special educational needs 1 6

p.14

Information about the school’s pupils

Number of pupils on the school’s special educational needs register 0 44

p.14

Information about the school’s pupils

English as an additional language No of pupils

p.14

Information about the school’s pupils

Number of pupils with English as an additional language 0

p.14

Information about the school’s pupils

Pupil mobility in the last school year No of pupils

p.14

Information about the school’s pupils

Pupils who joined the school other than at the usual time of first admission 22

p.14

Information about the school’s pupils

Pupils who left the school other than at the usual time of leaving 12

p.14

Attendance

National comparative data 5.2 National comparative data 0.5

p.14

Attendance

Both tables give the percentage of half days (sessions) missed through absence for the latest complete reporting year. Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 15 - January 2001

p.14

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 1

Number of registered pupils in final year of Key Stage 1 for the latest reporting year 2000 25 20 45

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 1

National Curriculum Test/Task Results Reading Writing Mathematics

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 1

Boys 20 22 22 Numbers of pupils at NC level 2 and above Girls 17 19 18

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 1

Percentage of pupils School 82(81) 91(87) 89(83) at NC level 2 or above National 84(82) 88(86) 88(87)

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 1

Teachers’ Assessments English Mathematics Science

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 1

Boys 20 22 23 Numbers of pupils at NC level 2 and above Girls 17 17 17

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 1

Percentage of pupils School 82(81) 87(81) 89(88) at NC level 2 or above National 84(82) 88(86) 88(87)

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 1

Percentages in brackets refer to the year before the latest reporting year.

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 2

Number of registered pupils in final year of Key Stage 2 for the latest reporting year 2000 28 29 57

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 2

National Curriculum Test/Task Results English Mathematics Science

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 2

Boys 26 23 28 Numbers of pupils at NC level 4 and above Girls 25 20 28

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 2

Percentage of pupils School 89(84) 75(86) 98(96) at NC level 4 or above National 75(70) 72(69) 85(78)

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 2

Teachers’ Assessments English Mathematics Science

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 2

Boys 18 22 26 Numbers of pupils at NC level 4 and above Girls 22 23 26

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 2

Percentage of pupils School 70(70) 79(77) 91(89) at NC level 4 or above National 70(66) 72(69) 80(75)

p.15

Attainment at the end of Key Stage 2

Percentages in brackets refer to the year before the latest reporting year. Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 16 - January 2001

p.15

Ethnic background of pupils Exclusions in the last school year

Black – Caribbean heritage 0 Black – Caribbean heritage 0 0

p.16

Ethnic background of pupils Exclusions in the last school year

Black – African heritage 0 Black – African heritage 0 0

p.16

Ethnic background of pupils Exclusions in the last school year

Any other minority ethnic group 5 Other minority ethnic groups

p.16

Ethnic background of pupils Exclusions in the last school year

This table refers to pupils of compulsory school age only. This table gives the number of exclusions of pupils of compulsory school age, which may be different from the number of pupils excluded.

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

Total number of qualified teachers (FTE) 15.6 Financial year 1999-2000

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

Number of pupils per qualified teacher 34

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

Education support staff: YR – Y6 Total expenditure 644395

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

Total number of education support staff 13 Expenditure per pupil 1538

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

Total aggregate hours worked per week 219 Balance brought forward from previous year -6788

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

Balance carried forward to next year -8381

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

Qualified teachers and support staff: nursery

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

Total number of qualified teachers (FTE) 1

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

Number of pupils per qualified teacher 31

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

Total number of education support staff 2

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

Total aggregate hours worked per week 40

p.16

Teachers and classes Financial information

FTE means full-time equivalent. Golcar Junior, Infant and Nursery School - 17 - January 2001

p.16

Percentage of responses in each category

Strongly agree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know

p.17

Percentage of responses in each category

My child is making good progress in school. 50 43 6 0 1

p.17

Percentage of responses in each category

Behaviour in the school is good. 34 50 4 2 10

p.17

Percentage of responses in each category

My child gets the right amount of work to do at home. 24 37 30 1 7

p.17

Percentage of responses in each category

I am kept well informed about how my child is getting on. 22 30 39 6 3

p.17

Percentage of responses in each category

I would feel comfortable about approaching the school with questions or a problem. 55 39 4 1 1

p.17

Percentage of responses in each category

The school expects my child to work hard and achieve his or her best. 54 44 1 0 1

p.17

Percentage of responses in each category

The school works closely with parents. 24 49 21 4 2

p.17

Percentage of responses in each category

The school is well led and managed. 40 50 5 0 5

p.17

Percentage of responses in each category

The school is helping my child become mature and responsible. 35 55 5 0 5

p.17

Percentage of responses in each category

The school provides an interesting range of activities outside lessons. 26 34 21 4 25

p.17

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion