Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years compliance action

Dean Close Little Trees Day Nursery, Tutshill

Inspected 23 Oct 2026 · URN EY494618

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    23 Oct 2026

  • URN verified

    EY494618

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

positive

Regulatory telephone call found the nursery has met the actions raised at its previous regulatory event.

Ofsted carried out a regulatory telephone call to check whether actions raised at the previous regulatory event had been met. The report finds the provider has taken action on safeguarding, communication, notifications, supervision, monitoring and safer eating. Inspectors are satisfied the actions have been met, and the provider remains registered with Ofsted.

Going well

  • Refresher training and staff meetings delivered on safeguarding, communication and safer eating
  • Supervision arrangements strengthened with regular meetings and peer observations
  • Increased monitoring through spot checks and headcounts
  • Menu choices reviewed with the catering provider to add age-appropriate food

What parents should know

  • The report focuses on checks of past actions, so it does not describe day-to-day experience of children in detail.
  • Parents may wish to ask how the setting now handles headcounts, transitions and mealtime food choices.

What other providers can learn

  • Regular spot checks and headcounts can help show that supervision and transitions are working in practice.
  • Reviewing menus with catering suppliers can help make food age-appropriate and support safer eating.

Summary written by AI (claude-haiku-5-5) from the report text. It can miss nuance: the report itself is the record.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−33Criticalmore positive than 36% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings198w−33
  • What needs to improve107w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
305
about usual (typical 317)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 27, typical 35
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%What needs to improve 35%

Full report text

Summary of outcome

All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.

p.1

Summary of outcome

On 23 October 2026, we carried out a regulatory telephone call. The focus of the call was to check whether the provider had met the training and skills, and the changes that must be notified to Ofsted actions, raised at their last regulatory event.

p.1

Summary of outcome

We found that the provider has taken action to strengthen practice by delivering refresher training and staff meetings focused on safeguarding, communication, significant event notifications, and safer eating. Leaders have enhanced staff supervision arrangements through regular supervision meetings and peer observations, increased monitoring through spot checks and headcounts, and reviewed transition procedures to improve children's safety and supervision. In addition, staff have received further guidance on safer eating practices, and leaders have worked with the catering provider to review menu choices and introduce more age-appropriate food options. We are satisfied that the actions raised at the previous regulatory event have been met. The provider remains registered with Ofsted.

p.1

Publication of compliance action

We aim to ensure that the welfare of children and young people is protected in the services we regulate. The Childcare Act 2006 and accompanying regulations set out our responsibilities to regulate childminders and childcare providers. This includes the enforcement powers we have in relation to those registered providers who do not comply with the requirements for registration.

p.1

Publication of compliance action

We publish details of any actions we take, or the childminder or childcare provider takes to bring about compliance with requirements on our website for a period of five years.

p.1

Publication of compliance action

For further information please read the Early years compliance handbook which can be found here at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-provider-non-compliance- action-by-ofsted .

p.1

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion