Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Cascade (Banks House) Limited in Kingston upon Hull
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Cascade (Banks House) Limited
- Inspection date verified
3 Sept 2026
- Inspectors verified
Evelyn Chafota
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2810524
- URN verified
2810524
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
mixedThe children's home is good, with warm relationships and strong partnerships, but staff must follow children's risk plans more consistently.
Children are making positive progress and benefit from warm, supportive relationships with staff. Leaders and managers are effective, and partnership working with other professionals is strong. Staff do not consistently follow agreed strategies in children's risk assessments when responding to behavioural and emotional difficulties, so some risks are not managed effectively.
Going well
- Children make positive progress and have warm, nurturing relationships with staff
- Children attend the on-site school and maintain good attendance
- Children's health needs are met, with routine and specialist appointments attended
- Effective, timely multi-agency working helps children receive coordinated support
To improve
- Staff must consistently follow agreed approaches and risk assessment measures for behaviour
- Learning from incidents must be embedded so that repeated incident types reduce
- The registered person must assess and reduce risks of harm to each child
Summary written by AI (claude-haiku-5-5) from the report text. It can miss nuance: the report itself is the record.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2025.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children are making positive progress and benefit from warm, nurturing relationships with staff. p.3
- The registered manager is ambitious for children and is committed to ensuring that they receive high-quality care. p.4
- Managers and staff have developed strong and effective working relationships with partner agencies, including social workers and other relevant professionals. p.3
- They benefit from warm and supportive relationships with staff, who invest meaningful time in getting to know them. p.3
- Managers and staff maintain positive and effective working relationships with partner agencies, including social workers and other relevant professionals. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language2
“Professionals report that communication is timely and effective.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 899
- shorter than usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2810524 1 Registered provider: Cascade (Banks House) Limited
p.1
Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home is privately operated. It provides care for up to 6 children who may have a learning disability and experience social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Three children were living in the home at the time of this inspection. The inspector spoke with one child and observed all the children and their interactions with staff.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The provider runs an independent school from a registered building adjoining the home. The inspector only inspected the social care provision on this site.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home and manager registered with Ofsted in January 2025.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2810524 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
03/06/2025 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2810524 3
p.2
Summary of findings
Children are making positive progress in their lives. They benefit from warm and supportive relationships with staff, who invest meaningful time in getting to know them. Staff create a caring environment where children feel respected and valued.
p.3
Summary of findings
Managers and staff have developed strong and effective working relationships with partner agencies, including social workers and other relevant professionals. These positive multi-agency relationships help to ensure that children receive coordinated support.
p.3
Summary of findings
Staff do not consistently follow agreed strategies or the measures set out in children’s risk assessments when responding to behavioural and emotional difficulties. As a result, children’s identified risks and needs are not always managed effectively.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are making positive progress and benefit from warm, nurturing relationships with staff. Staff spend quality time with children and create a welcoming, child- centred environment where children feel valued and respected and develop a strong sense of belonging.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children benefit from good educational support. All children attend the on-site school and maintain good attendance. Staff work closely with school staff, and this joined- up approach supports children’s learning and educational progress.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children’s health needs are met. They are registered with local health services, and staff ensure that children attend routine and specialist health appointments to promote their overall wellbeing. Staff encourage children to make healthy changes, such as maintaining a balanced diet and participating in regular physical activity. Staff have also introduced the use of a pain communication tool. This has helped children to express and communicate when they feel unwell or are experiencing pain.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are encouraged to express their wishes and feelings and contribute to decisions about their lives. They enjoy a range of social and recreational activities that support confidence, independence and personal development. Staff also help children to maintain positive relationships with family and friends, ensuring that important connections are sustained. Inspection report for children’s home: 2810524 4
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff do not consistently use agreed approaches when supporting children who struggle to manage their behavioural and emotional responses. Staff do not always follow the strategies and measures in children’s risk assessments, resulting in an escalation of risk, confusion and stress for children.
p.4
improvement to be good
Learning reviews have been carried out following incidents. However, some incident types have reoccurred, which does not provide sufficient assurance that learning has been fully embedded into practice to sustain improvement.
p.4
improvement to be good
All children have care plans and risk assessments in place. These are detailed, clearly identify children’s risks and vulnerabilities and are regularly reviewed and updated promptly when new risks emerge.
p.4
improvement to be good
Staff carry out focused work with children to support their understanding of how to keep themselves safe. Effective multi-agency working with partner agencies helps to promote and maintain appropriate safeguarding arrangements for children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The registered manager is ambitious for children and is committed to ensuring that they receive high-quality care. He is supported by a dedicated and committed staff team that shares the home’s ethos.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff report that they feel well supported by the management team. They benefit from regular training, team meetings and reflective supervision. Supervision sessions and team meetings provide staff with opportunities to discuss their roles, reflect on their practice and identify any support they require to carry out their responsibilities effectively. Staff also benefit from access to therapeutic support, which promotes their emotional wellbeing and resilience.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Managers have effective monitoring and auditing systems in place to oversee children’s progress, staff performance and the overall quality of care provided. In addition, monthly visits by an independent person offer external scrutiny. Managers review the findings from these visits and use any learning identified to make improvements and strengthen practice.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Managers and staff maintain positive and effective working relationships with partner agencies, including social workers and other relevant professionals. Professionals report that communication is timely and effective. Strong multi-agency working helps to ensure that children receive coordinated support. Inspection report for children’s home: 2810524 5
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including, the quality standards’. The registered person must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.5
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—
p.5
Requirement Due date
assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;
p.5
Requirement Due date
understand the roles and responsibilities in relation to protecting children that are assigned to them by the registered person;
p.5
Requirement Due date
that the home’s day-to-day care is arranged and delivered so as to keep each child safe and to protect each child effectively from harm. (Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(i)(v)(b))
p.5
Requirement Due date
This requirement has been reinstated from the previous inspection. 14 November
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2810524 6
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Cascade (Banks House) Limited
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Unit 2 Therm Road, Hull HU8 7BF
p.6
Inspector
Evelyn Chafota, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2810524 7 and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked-after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion