Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
9 Oct 2026
- URN verified
2738081
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
mixedChildminder found not meeting some requirements but improved outings risk assessment; still registered with Ofsted.
Ofsted received concerns about safeguarding policies and risk assessments, then made a regulatory visit on 8 October 2026. The childminder was not meeting some requirements but had taken action to put this right, including improving the outings risk assessment. Inspectors also found a significant event had not been notified to Ofsted, an offence, but Ofsted is not taking further action on this occasion.
Going well
- Provider took action to put identified requirements right
- Outings risk assessment improved to ensure children are adequately supervised
To improve
- Significant events must be notified to Ofsted, as failure to do so is an offence
Summary written by AI (claude-haiku-5-5) from the report text. It can miss nuance: the report itself is the record.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 227
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early year's providers must meet the legal requirements in the¿Statutory framework for the early year's foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 29 September we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to safeguarding policies and procedures and risk assessments.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 8 October 2026, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right. The provider has improved their risk assessment for outings to ensure that children are adequately supervised, to maintain their safety. However, during the visit we found the provider had failed to notify Ofsted of a significant event. This is an offence, however, on this occasion Ofsted are not taking further action
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion