Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectors verified
Russ Henry
- Postcode verified
NG1 1NG
- Name on report verified
Nottingham College
- URN verified
130776
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 298
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Nottingham College Adams Building, Stoney Street, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG1 1NG
p.1
inspection report:
During the focused monitoring inspection, inspectors considered the following evaluation areas. This was due to concerns raised to Ofsted about the provider related to His Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI) and/or the Secretary of State for Education commissioning an inspection to look at:
p.1
Safeguarding
The college has a clear attendance policy that makes explicit links between attendance concerns and safeguarding. When learners are absent, staff make appropriate checks on their welfare, which they continue until all reasonable avenues have been exhausted. However, they occasionally keep their records locally rather than recording them on shared college systems. This means that it is difficult for managers to evaluate their work.
p.1
Safeguarding
Leaders conducted a thorough investigation into a serious safeguarding incident earlier this year. Leaders took appropriate action, including further training for staff on safeguarding procedures. To minimise the chances of this happening again, leaders have successfully piloted a system that flags learner absences that should be treated as a safeguarding concern. They plan to implement this system in the new academic year.
p.1
Safeguarding
In a few cases, safeguarding policies and register-marking procedures are worded unhelpfully. Although this has not led to any safeguarding concerns, accepted practices do not always align fully with written guidance.
p.1
Safeguarding
Reports to governors do not make a link between attendance and safeguarding. This means that governors are unable to challenge leaders’ actions as well as they might. Monitoring inspection report: Nottingham College 30 June 2026
p.1
Additional next steps
Leaders and those responsible for governance should, in addition to the next steps raised at the provider’s last full inspection:
p.2
Additional next steps
Fully implement their new system for identifying learner absences that should be treated as a safeguarding concern. Ensure that staff record all actions they take in response to attendance concerns using shared college systems.
p.2
About this inspection
This inspection was conducted under Chapter 3 of Part 8 to the Education and Inspections Act 2006 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for focused monitoring inspections. The inspection was carried out because concerns had been raised with Ofsted about safeguarding.
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this monitoring inspection was not to determine grades for any of the evaluation areas, but to look into the concerns that caused Ofsted to decide to inspect the provider.
p.2
Lead inspector
Russ Henry His Majesty’s Inspector Monitoring inspection report: Nottingham College 30 June 2026
p.2
needs funding at time of inspection
Monitoring inspection report: Nottingham College 30 June 2026
p.4
4
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
4
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.4
4
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.4
4
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.4
4
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion