Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

ROC College (part of United Response)

Inspected — · published 9 Sept 2026 · URN 145154

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Matt Hann (lead), Louise Rowley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    Louise Rowley, Matt Hann

  • Postcode verified

    TQ9 5AL

  • Name on report verified

    ROC College (part of United Response)

  • URN verified

    145154

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedhigh expectationsrigorousaccurateconsistentlypromptlyimprovingprecise
Criticismpoortoo fewerrorstoo manybelownot improving

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings829w+40
  • What needs to improve81w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
901
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

ROC College (part of United Response) The Boatshed, Unit C, Steamer Quay Road, Totnes, Devon TQ9 5AL

p.1

report:

At the most recent full inspection, the following areas were identified as needing to improve:

p.1

report:

 Take action to improve learners’ attendance at college.  Improve the feedback that tutors provide to learners on their written work, including about errors in the use of English.  Improve tutors’ assessment of what learners know and can do in lessons and how this is used to set targets.  Improve the accuracy of leaders’ evaluation of the quality of teaching, in order to make improvements.  Continue to improve the monitoring of learners’ progress so that more learners are retained and achieve their qualifications.

p.1

report:

During the monitoring inspection, inspectors focused on the following themes:

p.1

report:

 How much progress have leaders made in ensuring that they have an accurate understanding of the quality of teaching to make improvements?  How much progress have leaders made in ensuring that teachers use assessment well to provide constructive feedback to learners, including in the use of English?  How much progress have leaders made in improving learners’ attendance by ensuring that they set high expectations for attendance and by tackling poor attendance consistently and promptly?  How much progress have leaders made in ensuring that learners achieve their qualifications? Monitoring inspection report: ROC College (part of United Response) 1 and 2 July 2026

p.1

(Curriculum, teaching and training)

Since the previous inspection, leaders have improved the structure of their quality oversight so that they have a more rigorous approach. They now routinely visit each of the 4 regional hubs located across Cornwall and Devon to undertake quality assurance activities, such as reviewing lesson observations that managers carry out. The activities that they complete on the visits provide them with assurances that the new quality processes are implemented by managers, although, in a few cases, the feedback provided by managers to tutors does not focus sufficiently on improving teaching skills.

p.2

(Curriculum, teaching and training)

Leaders mostly have an accurate understanding of the quality of the curriculum, teaching and training. They typically use this information well to inform the cross- college training that they provide to staff. However, it is still too soon to see the full impact of these actions.

p.2

the use of English? (Curriculum, teaching and training)

Leaders have implemented a rigorous assessment policy. They provide useful training to tutors to help them make the necessary improvements to feedback to learners. For example, tutors now use standardised feedback methods so that learners know what they need to do to improve. However, in a few cases, staff do not have the subject-specialist knowledge to provide precise enough feedback.

p.2

the use of English? (Curriculum, teaching and training)

Leaders have increased their level of scrutiny on the feedback that learners receive. They now employ staff at each regional hub to check assessed work routinely and the feedback given to learners. However, in a few cases, feedback provided to learners on the improvement of their English skills remains too vague.

p.2

development)

Leaders acknowledge that previously they did not monitor learners’ attendance well enough. They rightly recognise that too many learners still stop attending the college because the programme that they are studying does not meet their learning needs. Subsequently, too few learners stay and complete their intended programme.

p.2

development)

Leaders have recently employed specialist staff to meet their learners’ support needs, to help improve learners’ attendance and to reduce the proportion of learners who leave early. These staff provide useful support to help learners overcome the barriers that they face to attending their lessons. For example, learners with social, emotional Monitoring inspection report: ROC College (part of United Response) 1 and 2 July 2026

p.2

3

and mental health difficulties begin with reduced timetables that gradually increase in duration. Others begin with home-learning arrangements when this might be more appropriate.

p.3

3

Leaders know well the barriers that learners with high needs face to their learning or wellbeing. They have forged useful relationships with most local authorities to understand the starting points of their learners, many of whom previously disengaged from mainstream education. Leaders have improved their use of this information to inform learner engagement plans more accurately. Staff have begun to use these plans to set appropriate expectations for learners’ attendance.

p.3

their qualifications? (Achievement)

Leaders recognise that they need to act promptly to improve achievement rates. Achievement is still substantially below national rates, particularly for English and mathematics qualifications. Leaders acknowledge that the curriculum design requires further improvement so that learners study towards qualifications that are suited to their stage of learning.

p.3

their qualifications? (Achievement)

Leaders identified that previously they were not monitoring learners’ progress towards achieving their qualifications well enough. They have since implemented a more systematic process to maintain a closer oversight of learners’ performance. At the time of the inspection, it was too early to see the full impact of this change.

p.3

their qualifications? (Achievement)

Leaders have recently improved the support they provide to their learners to help them achieve their qualifications. They have employed specialist staff to provide learners swiftly with the support that they need from the beginning of their programme, such as accessible examination arrangements.

p.3

Additional next steps

Leaders and those responsible for governance should, in addition to the next steps raised at the provider’s previous full inspection:

p.3

Additional next steps

Ensure that the curriculum is well suited to the stage of learning that individual learners are at so that they stay and complete their programme.

p.3

Additional next steps

Ensure that the stable staff structure they have recently implemented is sustained, and that all learners benefit from teaching by subject specialists. Monitoring inspection report: ROC College (part of United Response) 1 and 2 July 2026

p.3

About this inspection

This is the first monitoring inspection following publication of the inspection report on 31 March 2025 which found the provider to be requires improvement overall.

p.4

About this inspection

The provider’s previous full inspection was carried out under the Education Inspection Framework (EIF) at that time. The renewed EIF took effect from 10 November 2025. The areas for improvement identified at the provider’s full inspection have been cross- referenced to relevant evaluation areas in the inspection toolkit for consideration on this monitoring inspection.

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this monitoring inspection was not to determine grades for any of the evaluation areas set out in the further education and skills inspection toolkit. The purpose was to identify and report on the provider’s progress in addressing the areas identified as needing to improve since the provider’s previous inspection.

p.4

About this inspection

Since the previous inspection, leaders have opened a new regional hub in Plymouth, Devon.

p.4

funding at time of inspection

Monitoring inspection report: ROC College (part of United Response) 1 and 2 July 2026

p.5

5

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

5

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

5

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

5

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

5

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion