Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Report card

Childminder

Inspected 9 Jul 2026 · URN 2591511

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lois Hulley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Framework verified

    Report card

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 Jul 2026

  • Inspectors verified

    Lois Hulley

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder

  • URN verified

    2591511

Page 3 of 5
Page 3 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−66Very criticalmore positive than 2% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisesafesecure
Criticismnot metbreachescompromisenot robustnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings13w0
  • What needs to improve290w−66

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
303
shorter than usual (typical 1698)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 43
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
8
typical 3
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%What needs to improve 39%About the inspection 60%

Full report text

Childminder

Unique reference number (URN): 2591511 Registered with Ofsted: 26/08/2020 Registers: EYR, CCR, VCR

p.1

Leadership and governance Urgent improvement

The childminder is not aware of all her statutory duties and does not ensure she meets them. She does not have a clear understanding of her safeguarding responsibilities. This impacts on the safety of children. The childminder has not ensured that assistants have passed all required checks before allowing them to have unsupervised access to children. This means that she cannot be ensured of their suitability to work with children. The childminder has not completed robust vetting procedures. She has not sought a reference for assistants. This means that she is not aware of potential safeguarding risks and cannot ensure assistants are suitable for the role. The childminder has not notified Ofsted of changes that could impact her suitability to work with children. These breaches to the requirements of the 'Statutory framework for the foundation stage' compromise children's safety.

p.1

Leadership and governance Urgent improvement

The arrangements for first aid are appropriate. The childminder has attended mandatory training. There is satisfactory support in place for assistants to enable them to discuss the children they care for and to provide coaching regarding their personal effectiveness. The childminder's home and garden are safe and secure. She ensures that children have daily access to outdoor play areas, including visits to the family allotment.

p.1

Compulsory Childcare Register requirements

This setting has not met the requirements of the compulsory part of the Childcare Register.

p.2

Register

When we check if settings meet the Compulsory Childcare Register requirements, they can have the following outcomes:

p.2

Voluntary Childcare Register requirements

This setting has not met the requirements of the voluntary part of Childcare Register.

p.2

Register

When we check if settings meet the Voluntary Childcare Register requirements, they can have the following outcomes:

p.2

Next steps

The provider is not meeting the requirements of the Early years foundation stage and Childcare Register and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action.

p.2

About this setting

Operating hours: Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday,Friday : 07:30 - 17:30 We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to have taken the following action by the assigned date:

p.3

Action Completion Date

demonstrate that the suitability of all assistants is checked, including taking a reference 03/08/2026

p.3

About this inspection

The inspector spoke with childminder during the inspection.

p.3

About this inspection

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.3

About this inspection

There were no early years children present at the time of this inspection. The findings in this report are based on evidence gathered from discussions with leaders and an inspection of the premises, equipment and any relevant documentation. When there are no early years children present, inspectors evaluate and grade only leadership and governance, as there is no reliable evidence from other evaluation areas through which to assess the impact on children.

p.3

About this inspection

We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. Local authority: Rochdale

p.3

Facts and figures used on inspection

This data was available to the inspector at the time of the inspection.

p.4

Exceptional

Practice is exceptional: of the highest standard nationally. Other settings can learn from it.

p.4

Strong standard

The setting reaches a strong standard. Leaders are working above the standard expected of them.

p.4

Expected standard

The setting is fulfilling the expected standard of education and/or care. This means they are following the standard set out in statutory and non ‑ statutory legislation and the professional standards expected of them.

p.4

Needs attention

The expected standards are not met but leaders are likely able to make the necessary improvements.

p.4

Urgent improvement

The setting needs to make urgent improvements to provide the expected standard of education and/or care. services providing education and skills for children and learners of all ages, and inspects and regulates services that care for children and young people.

p.4

Urgent improvement

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Urgent improvement

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Urgent improvement

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Urgent improvement

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion