Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Framework verified
Report card
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Jun 2026
- Inspectors verified
Damiana Cornacchia
- Name on report verified
Childminder
- URN verified
2536411
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder has not maintained effective oversight of the provision to ensure that all statutory requirements are met. p.1
- The childminder knows the possible signs of abuse and neglect and how to act in case of concerns about children's welfare. p.1
- However, the childminder does not follow safe recruitment procedures or implement effective risk assessments relating to the use of assistants. p.1
- For example, she allows assistants who are personally known to her to begin work before references are obtained. p.1
- As a result, safeguarding arrangements do not provide sufficient reassurance that children are protected. p.1
- The childminder has not ensured that her garden is sufficiently secure and free from hazards, which is a condition of her registration. p.1
- However, the impact on children is currently limited because there are no children on roll. p.1
- The provider is aware she needs to address this before reopening the setting. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 307
- shorter than usual (typical 1698)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 37, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Childminder
Unique reference number (URN): 2536411 Registered with Ofsted: 30/08/2019 Registers: EYR, CCR
p.1
Leadership and governance Urgent improvement
The childminder has not maintained effective oversight of the provision to ensure that all statutory requirements are met. The childminder knows the possible signs of abuse and neglect and how to act in case of concerns about children's welfare. However, the childminder does not follow safe recruitment procedures or implement effective risk assessments relating to the use of assistants. For example, she allows assistants who are personally known to her to begin work before references are obtained. As a result, safeguarding arrangements do not provide sufficient reassurance that children are protected.
p.1
Leadership and governance Urgent improvement
The childminder has not ensured that her garden is sufficiently secure and free from hazards, which is a condition of her registration. However, the impact on children is currently limited because there are no children on roll. The provider is aware she needs to address this before reopening the setting.
p.1
Leadership and governance Urgent improvement
The childminder understands the importance of working collaboratively with parents and relevant professionals to identify concerns and implement strategies to ensure all children, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, receive appropriate support to learn and make progress.
p.1
Leadership and governance Urgent improvement
The childminder explains how she will build positive relationships with children and manage their behaviour. For example, she describes how she would set clear boundaries and expectations appropriate for their age.
p.2
Compulsory Childcare Register requirements
This setting has not met the requirements of the compulsory part of the Childcare Register.
p.2
Register
When we check if settings meet the Compulsory Childcare Register requirements, they can have the following outcomes:
p.2
Next steps
To meet the requirements of the Early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must take the following actions by the assigned date:
p.2
Action Completion Date
ensure that appropriate references are obtained and verified for assistants before they begin working with children 08/07/2026
p.2
Action Completion Date
implement robust risk assessments to ensure children's health and safety 08/07/2026
p.2
About this setting
Operating hours: Monday,Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday,Friday : 08:00 - 18:00
p.3
Facts and figures used on inspection
This data was available to the inspector at the time of the inspection.
p.3
About this inspection
The inspector spoke with the childminder during the inspection.
p.3
About this inspection
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.3
About this inspection
There were no early years children present and/or on roll at the time of this inspection. The findings in this report are based on evidence gathered from discussions with leaders and an inspection of the premises, equipment and any relevant documentation. When there are no early years children present, inspectors evaluate and grade only leadership and governance, as there is no reliable evidence from other evaluation areas through which to assess the impact on children.
p.3
Exceptional
Practice is exceptional: of the highest standard nationally. Other settings can learn from it.
p.4
Strong standard
The setting reaches a strong standard. Leaders are working above the standard expected of them.
p.4
Expected standard
The setting is fulfilling the expected standard of education and/or care. This means they are following the standard set out in statutory and non ‑ statutory legislation and the professional standards expected of them.
p.4
Needs attention
The expected standards are not met but leaders are likely able to make the necessary improvements.
p.4
Urgent improvement
The setting needs to make urgent improvements to provide the expected standard of education and/or care.
p.4
Urgent improvement
services providing education and skills for children and learners of all ages, and inspects and regulates services that care for children and young people.
p.4
Urgent improvement
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.4
Urgent improvement
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk . Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.4
Urgent improvement
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion