Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Kings Meadow Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
29 Jul 2026
- URN verified
EY348316
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 339
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 32, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 6 May 2026, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to concerns about children's safety and welfare, safeguarding policies and procedures, health, safety and suitability of premises, environment and equipment and information and record keeping. On 11 May 2026, the provider notified us about matters relating to the same requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 16 and 22 July 2026, we carried out regulatory telephone calls. On 21 July 2026, the provider shared with Ofsted relevant documents, including an internal safeguarding investigation report. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right. The provider has ensured that all staff with a designated safeguarding lead (DSL) responsibility understand how to recognise, record and report safeguarding concerns in line with local safeguarding partnership procedures. Refresher training has been provided to staff with a DSL responsibility to ensure safeguarding concerns are identified promptly and referred to relevant agencies, where appropriate. The provider has ensured that the DSL provides appropriate advice and guidance to staff, and that relevant information is shared with other professionals to promote children's safety. In addition, the provider has improved how relevant records are maintained to ensure the
p.1
Summary of outcome
setting is safe and efficiently managed, and the needs of all children are met.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion