Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Tom Thumb Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
23 Jul 2026
- URN verified
2766973
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- During this visit, we found that the provider had failed to ensure that their risk assessments were sufficient to ensure children with a known food intolerance did not have access to certain foods. p.1
- In addition, the provider failed to notify Ofsted of the event and has since taken measures to improve their understanding of notifications into Ofsted. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 253
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 17 June 2026, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to safer eating and risk assessments.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 21 July 2026, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right. During this visit, we found that the provider had failed to ensure that their risk assessments were sufficient to ensure children with a known food intolerance did not have access to certain foods. However, they have taken swift and appropriate action to improve the risk assessment process to prevent this from happening again.
p.1
Summary of outcome
In addition, the provider failed to notify Ofsted of the event and has since taken measures to improve their understanding of notifications into Ofsted.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion