Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Spring Park Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
13 Jul 2026
- URN verified
EY262887
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 333
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage,' which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 28 May 2026, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to concerns about children's safety and welfare, safeguarding policies and procedures, staff: child ratios and safety and suitability of premises, environment and equipment. On 4 June 2026, the provider notified us about matters relating to the same requirements. In addition, information and record keeping, whistleblowing, and key person.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 9 July 2026, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that the designated safeguarding leads attend a training course consistent with the criteria sent out in Annex C
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that all staff including agency staff receive induction training to help them to understand their roles and responsibilities.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 22 July 2026, the provider responded to the actions set. We found that the provider had improved their knowledge and understanding of child protection procedures. In addition, all staff have undergone a comprehensive induction and new guidelines are in place for agency staff. This ensures that all staff know and understand their roles and responsibilities. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements. We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion