Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Kidzania Childcare Darwen
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
14 Jul 2026
- URN verified
2692646
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 875
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2 . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 19 January, 2, 24 and 30 March 2026, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to safeguarding policies and procedures, whistleblowing, concerns about children's safety and welfare, suitable people, qualifications, training, support and skills, paediatric first-aid , staff-to-child ratios, health, safety and suitability of premises, environment and equipment and special educational needs.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 23 April 2026, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provision was graded to be urgent improvement. The inspection report card sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
Following the inspection, we served a welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that required the provider to take the actions set out in the report card. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 1 June 2026, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found that the provider had not met all the actions set in the welfare requirements notice. We served another welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that required the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n provide staff with training to enable them to meet children's care needs and plan for children's learning and development
p.1
Summary of outcome
n implement an effective key person system to ensure that children's care is tailored to meet their individual needs, to offer a settled relationship with children and build relationships with parents
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that there is a suitably experienced member of staff to take charge of the room for children under two years
p.2
Summary of outcome
n take all reasonable steps to ensure children are not exposed to risks
p.2
Summary of outcome
n obtain information about children's special dietary requirements, allergies and intolerances and develop accurate allergy action plans that are known and understood by all members of staff
p.2
Summary of outcome
n ensure that ongoing discussions are held with parents regarding children's stage of solid foods
p.2
Summary of outcome
n ensure that food is prepared in a way to prevent choking
p.2
Summary of outcome
n ensure that staff implement effective strategies to support and manage children's behaviour
p.2
Summary of outcome
n put in place arrangements for support for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.2
Summary of outcome
On 8 July 2026, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last regulatory visit.
p.2
Summary of outcome
We found that the provider had provided staff with appropriate training opportunities. Staff were able to demonstrate that they understood children's care needs and how to plan for their learning and development. We found that a key person system has been implemented. The provider has ensured that each child has a key person that knows them well. They have introduced systems to gather and share regular information with parents about children. We found that a suitably experienced member of staff is able to take charge of the room for children under two years. They have experience working with that age group and have a suitable knowledge and understanding of the care of babies. We found that adequate risk assessments are now in place. These are monitored by leaders and staff have received training to ensure that they are able to identify and minimise risks to children. The provider has ensured that information about children's dietary requirements is gathered from parents
p.2
Summary of outcome
and health professionals. They have implemented allergy action plans that staff know and understand. This means that they could respond appropriately in the event of a child having a reaction. The provider has implemented a system to gather ongoing information from parents about during the introduction of solid foods to children. This includes information about what foods children have tried at home and the texture and consistency, in order to keep them safe. In addition, they have ensured that food is prepared in a way to prevent chocking. Staff have received training on this and they have added prompts and reminders to food preparation areas. We found that effective strategies are in place to help staff to support and manage children's behaviour. These include targeted plans that meet children's individual needs. In addition, support is now being implemented for children with SEND. The provider has ensured that staff have shared information with parents and referrals for
p.2
Summary of outcome
additional support have been put in place.
p.3
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised.
p.3
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.3
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.3
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.3
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion