Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Abundantia Care Limited in Doncaster
Summary
Lisa Richards (lead), Gemma Sheader
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Abundantia Care Limited
- Inspection date verified
2 Jun 2026
- Inspectors verified
Gemma Sheader, Lisa Richards
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Name on report verified
2839479
- URN verified
2839479
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRI to be good
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff build positive relationships with children and have consistent boundaries to help them feel safe and secure. p.3
- However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted. p.1
- Multi-agency working is positive and effective. p.2
- Children say they feel safe; one child was able to identify staff they would talk to if they had any worries and said staff are ‘caring’. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This means that staff are not always clear on what to do, and gaps in monitoring indicate ineffective oversight. p.2
- They carry out some monitoring of plans and practices, but this is not sufficiently robust, and shortfalls in assessing and reviewing key documents mean that children’s plans and risk assessments are not consistently updated or reflective of current information. p.3
- Weaknesses in care planning and information-sharing mean that children’s progress is not consistently understood or promoted. p.2
- As a result, staff are not always provided with accurate or up-to-date guidance to inform their care, and known risks are not consistently shared. p.3
- The rationale for these restrictions is not consistently supported by robust risk assessment or clear management oversight, meaning that decisions are not always sufficiently justified or proportionate. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person may only use devices for the monitoring or surveillance of children if— p.6
- The registered person should ensure that, in line with the ethos of the home, children are offered advice, support and guidance on their health and wellbeing. p.6
- Staff should have the relevant skills and knowledge to help children understand, and, where necessary, work to change negative behaviours in key areas of health and wellbeing, such as vaping. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development4
“There are some emerging strengths in the staffing arrangements.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,636
- about usual (typical 1899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2839479 1 Registered provider: Abundantia Care Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home registered with Ofsted in October 2025 and is operated by a private provider. It offers care for up to 2 children who may experience social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of this inspection, 2 children were living in the home. Both children were spoken with during the inspection.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager registered with Ofsted in October 2025.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
requires improvement to be good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Date of last inspection: not previously inspected
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Enforcement action since last inspection: not applicable Inspection report for children’s home: 2839479 2
p.1
Summary of findings
Children have positive relationships with staff, and they are encouraged to participate in activities outside the home. Children are listened to, and staff work alongside them to offer a stable, friendly home to live in. Multi-agency working is positive and effective.
p.2
Summary of findings
Plans for children are not routinely reviewed and do not always contain all relevant information. This means that staff are not always clear on what to do, and gaps in monitoring indicate ineffective oversight.
p.2
Summary of findings
A lack of management oversight and insufficient sharing of relevant information have been identified as shortfalls. Overall, the home requires improvement to be good.
p.2
improvement to be good
Weaknesses in care planning and information-sharing mean that children’s progress is not consistently understood or promoted. Not all relevant information about children is captured effectively or shared with partner agencies, which limits coordinated care and reduces the ability to respond to children’s changing needs. Plans are not routinely reviewed or sufficiently updated, which means that children’s progress is difficult to measure, and opportunities to evaluate the effectiveness of care are missed.
p.2
improvement to be good
Children are provided with regular opportunities to share their wishes and feelings, and staff encourage them to express their views. This is undermined by the implementation of restrictions that limit children’s freedom of choice and movement, such as using door alarms 24 hours a day. The rationale for these restrictions is not consistently supported by robust risk assessment or clear management oversight, meaning that decisions are not always sufficiently justified or proportionate. Children are informed about how to make a complaint and access advocacy services that support their ability to seek help and advice when needed.
p.2
improvement to be good
There are some strengths in how children are supported to engage in education. Staff actively encourage attendance and work in partnership with education professionals to establish routines that promote learning. Feedback from education professionals is positive, and children have made progress in both attendance and attainment. Achievements are appropriately recognised, which helps build children’s confidence and motivation.
p.2
improvement to be good
Children are encouraged to attend routine healthcare appointments and are supported in developing an understanding of their health needs. However, staff have not consistently sought targeted or specialist support to address ongoing health concerns, such as children’s use of e-cigarettes or high-energy drinks. This limits the effectiveness of interventions to promote healthier choices and improve outcomes. Inspection report for children’s home: 2839479 3 Staff demonstrate a commitment to supporting children, and there are some positive outcomes. Children are supported to maintain relationships with family members and other people who are important to them. These relationships are facilitated and encouraged by staff, helping children to feel valued and connected.
p.2
improvement to be good
Risk assessments do not identify the known risks for the children. Children’s individual needs and past experiences are not considered. Strategies for staff to keep children safe are not clear. Staff do not have the information they need to ensure that children remain safe and reduce the risk of harm. Risk assessments are not updated and lack management oversight.
p.3
improvement to be good
When children move into the home, information about all known risks is not shared with professionals. Impact risk assessments are carried out and meetings are held to consider whether children’s needs can be met. Not all relevant information has been shared. The lack of information-sharing affects the quality of assessments and limits assurance that children’s needs can be safely met.
p.3
improvement to be good
Door alarms are in constant use in the home, including in children’s bedrooms, to notify staff when children move. These restrictions are not reviewed in line with the children’s plans. Opportunities are not taken to lessen this restriction when appropriate. One child does not understand why door alarms are used and said they disturb their sleep.
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff use a therapeutic approach to support children in managing their behaviours and feelings. Staff build positive relationships with children and have consistent boundaries to help them feel safe and secure. Children say they feel safe; one child was able to identify staff they would talk to if they had any worries and said staff are ‘caring’. Clinical supervision is provided monthly for all staff, which supports them to meet children’s needs in a therapeutic manner.
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff have a good understanding of the risks that using the internet may pose for children. They have systems to monitor online use and support children in learning how to keep themselves safe. Children are included in mobile phone or room searches, and they are carried out sensitively by staff. Consideration is given to children’s need to feel safe and to have their dignity and rights respected.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
The manager does not demonstrate sufficient oversight of the home. They carry out some monitoring of plans and practices, but this is not sufficiently robust, and shortfalls in assessing and reviewing key documents mean that children’s plans and risk assessments are not consistently updated or reflective of current information. As a result, staff are not always provided with accurate or up-to-date guidance to inform their care, and known risks are not consistently shared. This weakens practice and means that Inspection report for children’s home: 2839479 4 decisions about children moving into the home are not always based on a full and current understanding of risk.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Monitoring systems are not yet effective. The manager’s quality of care review lacks evaluative analysis and does not set out clear priorities for improvement over the next 6 months. The quality-of-care review report has also not been submitted within the required timescales. These shortfalls demonstrate weaknesses in management oversight and regulatory compliance.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
There are some emerging strengths in the staffing arrangements. The home is adequately staffed, recruitment processes are safe and appropriate, and staff benefit from regular supervision that supports reflection and practice development. The manager prioritises training, and staff receive core training and additional training that is relevant to the needs of the children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
The manager has created a safe and homely environment for the children to live in. They ensure that the home is furnished to a high standard and that children feel comfortable, with sufficient space for them to spend time together or apart.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
The manager has created positive working relationships with other agencies that work with the children. Specialist workers report effective working relationships that benefit the children living in the home. Inspection report for children’s home: 2839479 5
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.5
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—
p.5
Requirement Due date
assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;
p.5
Requirement Due date
have the skills to identify and act upon signs that a child is at risk of harm;
p.5
Requirement Due date
understand the roles and responsibilities in relation to protecting children that are assigned to them by the registered person;
p.5
Requirement Due date
that the home’s day-to-day care is arranged and delivered so as to keep each child safe and to protect each child effectively from harm. (Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(i)(iii)(v)(b)) 21 August 2026
p.5
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.5
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.5
Requirement Due date
understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home; 28 August 2026 Inspection report for children’s home: 2839479 6 demonstrate that practice in the home is informed and improved by taking into account and acting on.
p.5
Requirement Due date
research and developments in relation to the ways in which the needs of children are best met; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(b) (2)(f)(g)(i)(h))
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person may only use devices for the monitoring or surveillance of children if—
p.6
Requirement Due date
the monitoring or surveillance is for the purpose of safeguarding and promoting the welfare of the child concerned, or other children;
p.6
Requirement Due date
so far as reasonably practicable in the light of the child’s age and understanding, the child is informed in advance of the intention to do the monitoring or surveillance; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
the monitoring or surveillance is no more intrusive than necessary, having regard to the child’s need for privacy. (Regulation 24 (1)(a)(c)(d)) 28 August 2026
p.6
Recommendation
The registered person should ensure that, in line with the ethos of the home, children are offered advice, support and guidance on their health and wellbeing. Staff should have the relevant skills and knowledge to help children understand, and, where necessary, work to change negative behaviours in key areas of health and wellbeing, such as vaping. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, pages 34 and 35, paragraphs 7.10 and 7.18)
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2839479 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Abundantia Care Limited
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Suite 9a Stanley Grange Business Village, Ormskirk Road, Liverpool L34 4AT
p.7
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Michael Reynolds
p.7
Inspectors
Lisa Richards, Social Care Inspector Gemma Sheader, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2839479 8 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion