Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Norto5 KIDZ - Lindfield
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
22 May 2026
- URN verified
EY359520
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 316
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the¿Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 26 March 2026, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to safeguarding policies and procedures, smoking and vaping and intimate hygiene.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 11 May 2026, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting one of the requirements. We have issued an action for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n implement a clear and robust policy and procedure relating to the use of mobile phones, cameras and other electronic devices and how they are used in the setting, ensuring leaders oversight to ensure this is effective in daily practice.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 13 May 2026 and 19 May 2026, the provider responded to the action set. We found that the provider had revised their policies and procedures relating to the use of mobile phones, cameras and other electronic devises. These are now clear and robust. The provider had ensured all staff fully understood the revised policy. In addition, the provider had put arrangements in place to ensure their oversight of practice in relation to the use of electronic devises to keep children safe.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years. For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion