Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Great Oak Lodge Limited in Norfolk
Summary
Harkerat Lidhar (lead), Naomi Starbuck
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Great Oak Lodge Limited
- Inspection date verified
23 Apr 2026
- Inspectors verified
Harkerat Lidhar, Naomi Starbuck
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2775131
- URN verified
2775131
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2025.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- positive responses to other children and adults. p.6
- de-escalate confrontations with or between children, or potentially violent behaviour by children. p.6
- The registered person should ensure that any consequences used to address poor behaviour are restorative in nature and help children recognise the impact of their behaviour on themselves, other children, the staff caring for them, and the wider community. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance5
“Leaders and managers are ambitious for the children and staff.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,127
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 12 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2775131 1 Registered provider: Great Oak Lodge Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home provides care for up to 4 children aged between 11 and 17 who experience social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of this inspection, 4 children were living at the home.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager registered with Ofsted in January 2025.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for children’s home: 2775131 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
08/07/2025 Full Good 05/08/2024 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2775131 3
p.2
Summary of findings
Staff provide children with a nurturing and supportive environment. They know the children well and respond to their individual needs. They show a strong commitment to children’s care and wellbeing. Education is a clear priority supported by a member of staff who promotes engagement. Children have clear plans to guide their care and support. Incidents are generally well managed. However, at times, de-escalation strategies are unclear. The manager provides effective analytical oversight. The staff are invested and care for the children. Some of the consequences used have not supported children’s understanding and learning.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Three children live in the main house and spoke to the inspector. One child is being supported with independence and is living in the annex connected to the main house.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff are committed to ensuring that children experience stability and consistency. One child was in hospital for an extended period following an accident. Staff supported the child daily while he was in hospital. They advocated for a safe return home and used creative approaches to support the child’s recovery. This helped the child feel valued and develop trusting relationships with staff.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
All children have an identified education provision. One member of staff is the education champion and places a strong emphasis on education. Staff listen to the children’s views and act on them. One child was supported in returning to their preferred school. For a child who is unable to attend their school, staff have shown a clear drive in identifying a suitable provision. Feedback from the headteacher of the virtual school highlights that the staff work hard to get children into school and maintain school placements.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children appear happy and settled. They spend time with staff and were seen baking and doing schoolwork. Staff recognise and celebrate important events and achievements in children’s lives. Children’s achievements are illustrated in memory books. Staff also produce and display monthly home newsletters. These provide children with a record of their time at the home and allow them to reflect on their positive experiences.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff regularly seek children’s views with daily check-ins and regular one-to-one sessions. Records are well written and clearly reflect the children’s views. Children’s meetings take place weekly. It is clear what actions will be taken so children can see they have been heard. Staff ensure that all children are included and have opportunities to express their views. Inspection report for children’s home: 2775131 4
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff plan effectively before children move in. A suitability assessment considers children’s individual needs alongside the needs of the other children already living at the home. The staff meet with the child and talk to them about the home. Children are offered an opportunity to visit the home. These assessments and processes are comprehensive and carefully considered.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
There have been a high number of incidents at the home. Significant incidents are generally well managed. Following incidents, staff update risk assessments, safety plans and care plans. These documents are clear and reflect children’s needs and current presentation. They provide staff with clear guidance on how to manage and support children.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Incidents are well recorded. Staff provide children with follow-up one-to-one discussions after incidents. This helps children reflect on their feelings and consider alternative approaches.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff know the children well and have a good understanding of their needs. Staff use this understanding to provide responsive and nurturing care. Two incidents occurred when staff did not adhere to the children’s support plans. During these incidents, it is not clear which de-escalation strategies were used. This limits the oversight of the approaches used to prevent situations from escalating.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff generally manage consequences in a considered way. They use some natural and appropriate consequences; however, they are not always restorative in nature. This can make it difficult for the child to fully understand the intended learning. In some situations, when consequences are extended over time, this can reduce their overall effectiveness.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Leaders and managers are ambitious for the children and staff. Feedback from a child’s social worker describes the manager as a ‘committed’ and ‘dedicated’ advocate for children. The manager and staff work well alongside other professionals. A range of positive feedback supports this.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Management oversight is effective and analytical. The manager carries out monthly reviews of the incidents to identify any trends or patterns. This helps inform practice and improve responses. The manager attends handovers and reviews all the children’s records and documents. Actions are clearly recorded and followed up with staff to ensure that learning is embedded and practice is improved.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff are supported in taking on champion roles. They are committed to their responsibilities and demonstrate a clear focus on improving outcomes for children. Staff are happy with the progression opportunities available and wish to remain in the company. This helps build a skilled and stable workforce. Inspection report for children’s home: 2775131 5 Staff benefit from regular team meetings and group reflection. Reflection takes place during team meetings. Supervision sessions are carried out in line with policy and incorporate detail and reflection. They provide staff an opportunity to express their views, receive feedback and identify any areas for development.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff have access to all relevant mandatory training. There is an investment in staff training and development. When staff have expressed an interest in further training, the request has been actioned. This supports building a skilled and knowledgeable workforce. Inspection report for children’s home: 2775131 6
p.5
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The positive relationships standard is that children are helped to develop, and to benefit from, relationships based on—
p.6
Requirement Due date
an understanding about acceptable behaviour; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
positive responses to other children and adults.
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—
p.6
Requirement Due date
de-escalate confrontations with or between children, or potentially violent behaviour by children. (Regulation 11 (1)(a)(b)(c) (2)(a)(xi)) 26 June 2026
p.6
Recommendation
The registered person should ensure that any consequences used to address poor behaviour are restorative in nature and help children recognise the impact of their behaviour on themselves, other children, the staff caring for them, and the wider community. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 46, paragraph 9.38)
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2775131 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Great Oak Lodge Limited
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Building 18, Gateway 1000 Whittle Way, Arlington Business Park, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 2FP
p.7
Inspectors
Harkerat Lidhar, Social Care Inspector Naomi Starbuck, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2775131 8 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion