Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by City of York Council in York

Inspected 22 Apr 2026 · published 22 May 2026 · URN 2785671

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

RI to be good

Deirdre Silkstone (lead), Shaun Martin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    City of York Council

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Apr 2026

  • Inspectors verified

    Deirdre Silkstone, Shaun Martin

  • Helped and protected verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Name on report verified

    2785671

  • URN verified

    2785671

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2025.

  • OverallRI to be good
  • Helped and protectedRI to be good
  • Leadership and managementRI to be good

13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−32Criticalmore positive than 47% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrengtheffectiveeffectivelyconsistentlyexcellentsupportivepositivestrengths
Criticismweaknessesgapsharmnot alwaysconcernsineffectiveat riskrequires improvement

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1239w−27
  • What needs to improve345w−58

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,570
about usual (typical 1899)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Inspection report for children’s home: 2785671 1 Registered provider: City of York Council

p.1

Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The home is operated by a local authority. The service operates across two settings. It provides care for up to 6 children who may experience social and emotional difficulties.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

At the time of the inspection, 4 children were living across both settings. Three children were spoken with.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

There are temporary management arrangements in place, but currently the home has no registered manager.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

requires improvement to be good

How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

requires improvement to be good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good

p.1

requires improvement to be good

The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.

p.1

requires improvement to be good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

requires improvement to be good

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2785671 2

p.1

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

04/06/2025 Full Good 14/01/2025 Full Inadequate Inspection report for children’s home: 2785671 3

p.2

Summary of findings

The home offers strong relationships between staff and children, clinical input and effective multi-agency working. However, weaknesses in daily routines, safeguarding oversight and leadership mean children do not receive consistently safe or stable care. Staffing shortages and reliance on agency workers disrupt continuity and undermine the relationship-based model. A serious safeguarding incident, inconsistent incident reporting and gaps in monitoring highlight ineffective oversight. Although the interim manager provides supportive and positive leadership, these strengths have not addressed the shortfalls. Overall, the home requires improvements to be good.

p.3

improvement to be good

Children do not experience a consistent daily structure. This is particularly evident during education hours, when children’s routines are unclear and expectations are not firmly established. As a result, children do not always receive the support that they need to engage in learning or to develop healthy daily routines. The inconsistency in daily planning limits the progress children could otherwise make.

p.3

improvement to be good

Some children report that some incidents in the home draw staff attention away from them. When this occurs, staff time and resources are disproportionately focused on managing incidents rather than meeting the day ‑ to ‑ day needs of all children. This has had a negative impact on the quality of care and the overall experience for some children, who feel overlooked at times.

p.3

improvement to be good

Despite these shortfalls, relationships between staff and children are a clear strength of the home and form the foundation of the support provided. Children benefit from trusting relationships that enable staff to manage risk effectively and respond to their complex needs in a planned and considered way. Children consistently report that they enjoy living in the home, and there is evidence of continuity in their care.

p.3

improvement to be good

The home benefits from strong in ‑ house clinical expertise. The clinical psychologist provides direct therapeutic support to children and offers regular guidance to staff, including specialist input relating to substance use and associated behaviours. As a result, staff have an enhanced understanding of children’s needs and are better equipped to provide informed and therapeutic responses.

p.3

improvement to be good

Multi ‑ agency working is a further strength. Information sharing between professionals is effective, particularly in relation to risks of exploitation. The presence of an in ‑ house police officer supports timely decision ‑ making and coordinated safeguarding responses. These partnerships contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of children’s risks and needs. Inspection report for children’s home: 2785671 4

p.3

improvement to be good

A significant safeguarding incident occurred involving two children, which has had a considerable and lasting impact on their lives. Although the incident was unpredictable, it was avoidable. Weaknesses in staff supervision and oversight of children meant that opportunities to prevent the incident were missed. This shortfall demonstrates that safeguarding arrangements are not consistently effective.

p.4

improvement to be good

Incident reporting lacks consistency and does not always provide a clear or comprehensive account of events. Some reports do not contain sufficient detail to support a full understanding of what occurred or how staff responded. In addition, there are delays between incidents taking place and follow up conversations with staff being completed. These gaps reduce transparency and hinder the home’s ability to learn from incidents or fully understand children’s experiences. As a result, important aspects of children’s care journeys are not always captured.

p.4

improvement to be good

Despite these shortfalls, staff have a good understanding of children’s individual risks and respond appropriately when concerns arise. Staff follow safety plans for high ‑ risk issues, including child sexual exploitation and criminal exploitation, and they implement missing ‑ from ‑ care protocols when required. Although children often decline to engage in return ‑ home interviews with external professionals, these are consistently offered in line with statutory guidance.

p.4

improvement to be good

Staff use their relationships with children to hold meaningful, personalised conversations about risks and safety. These interactions are warm, genuine and demonstrate staff’s concern for children’s wellbeing. While levels of risk remain high for some children, staff are persistent in their efforts to educate, guide and reduce harm. Their commitment to maintaining dialogue, even when progress is slow, is a strength.

p.4

improvement to be good

Allegations and complaints are taken seriously and acted upon promptly. The manager seeks advice from relevant safeguarding professionals and ensures that records are detailed and accurate. Children are updated on outcomes in a timely manner, helping to reduce anxiety and prevent unnecessary distress.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Staffing levels in the home are not sufficient to meet the high-risk needs of the children. Gaps in staffing have resulted in a reliance on agency workers, which undermines the relationship-based practice that is central to the home’s model of care. This reliance disrupts continuity for children and weakens the stability of the professional network around them. Both staff and children report that frequent changes in agency staff and the limitations to what agency staff are permitted to do make it difficult to build and sustain meaningful relationships. As a result, some children do not experience the consistent professional support they need to make sustained progress. Inspection report for children’s home: 2785671 5 There are significant gaps in the home’s records and paperwork. Missing safeguarding reports and the absence of managerial evaluation on incidents highlight that monitoring and auditing systems are ineffective. These weaknesses limit the ability of leaders and

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

managers to identify patterns, address concerns promptly and drive improvement in practice.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Although the organisation and the home have a training plan in place, staff have identified gaps in their training that directly affect their ability to fully understand and respond to children’s needs. One child’s complex and high-risk drug use, and another child’s communication needs, have been highlighted as areas where staff require further training and guidance. These gaps reduce staff confidence and limit their capacity to provide consistently informed care.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

The interim manager has provided clear and steady leadership during a challenging and extended period of instability. Professionals speak highly of them and describe them as ‘excellent’. The interim manager has developed positive working relationships with external agencies, advocates strongly for children’s needs and challenges other professionals when necessary. Staff feel supported by the interim manager and value their presence. The interim manager has a clear understanding of the home’s strengths and weaknesses. However, due to the short timescales of their interim role, they have not had the time and space to prevent the shortfalls identified or implement the changes required to improve practice.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Supervision sessions for staff and team meetings are a strength of the home. Staff benefit from open, reflective discussions that capture their concerns honestly and receive supportive, child-focused responses from supervisors. Team meetings are similarly child-centred and effective. The clinical psychologist plays an important role in both forums, offering specialist insight and supporting staff to understand and respond to children’s needs. External professionals are also routinely involved to enhance staff knowledge and practice. Inspection report for children’s home: 2785671 6

p.5

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to The Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person must comply within the given timescales.

p.6

Requirement Due date

The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.

p.6

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—

p.6

Requirement Due date

assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;

p.6

Requirement Due date

have the skills to identify and act upon signs that a child is at risk of harm;

p.6

Requirement Due date

manage relationships between children to prevent them from harming each other;

p.6

Requirement Due date

understand the roles and responsibilities in relation to protecting children that are assigned to them by the registered person;

p.6

Requirement Due date

that the home’s day-to-day care is arranged and delivered so as to keep each child safe and to protect each child effectively from harm. (Regulation 12 (1)(2)(a)(i)(iii)(iv)(v)(b)) 23 July 2026

p.6

Requirement Due date

The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—

p.6

Requirement Due date

helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and

p.6

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to— 23 July 2026 Inspection report for children’s home: 2785671 7 ensure that the home has sufficient staff to provide care for each child;

p.6

Requirement Due date

use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(d)(h))

p.7

Requirement Due date

The care planning standard is that children—

p.7

Requirement Due date

receive effectively planned care in or through the children’s home. (Regulation 14 (1)(a)) 23 July 2026

p.7

Recommendation

 The registered person should ensure that staff gain skills that enable them to actively support each child. In particular, ensure that staff receive training relevant to the individual needs of each children. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 52, paragraph 10.5)

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2785671 8

p.7

Children’s home details

Registered provider: City Of York Council

p.8

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: West Offices, Station Rise, York YO1 6GA

p.8

Inspectors

Deirdre Silkstone, Social Care Inspector (lead) Shaun Martin, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2785671 9 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion