Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Surrey County Council in Surrey
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Surrey County Council
- Inspection date verified
9 Apr 2026
- Inspectors verified
Jacob Robson
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Name on report verified
2756164
- URN verified
2756164
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2025.
- OverallRI to be good
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted. p.1
- One child who had a significant physical health difficulty resulting in hospital admission, is now engaging fully with their treatment plan and their health and self-care is much improved. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, management oversight following incidents is inconsistent, and follow-up actions are not always timely or robust. p.4
- Safeguarding practice is generally appropriate; however, weak management oversight, inconsistent review of incidents and the impact of police involvement reduced the effectiveness of protection for some children. p.3
- The care children receive helps them to make progress in some areas, but this is inconsistent and not always sustained. p.3
- Some unsafe items have not been removed from children’s environment. p.4
- Leaders are committed and staffing is stable, but previous weaknesses remain and statutory requirements are unmet. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In particular, ensure prompt attention to maintenance, repair and the removal of unsafe items. p.7
- In particular, ensure consistent oversight of incidents and follow up actions, including addressing of concerns about staff practice and ensuring timely notifications to Ofsted. p.8
- In particular carry out learning reviews following incidents as described in the statement of purpose. p.8
- This requirement is restated. 9 June 2026 p.8
- The registered person must ensure that all employees— p.9
- In particular, ensure that staff receive regular supervision and appraisal in line with company policy. p.9
- The registered person may only use devices for the monitoring or surveillance of children if— p.9
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,405
- longer than usual (typical 1899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 7
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 1 Registered provider: Surrey County Council Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This local authority home provides care for up to 4 children who experience social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of the inspection there were 3 children living in the home.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
requires improvement to be good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
07/05/2025 Full Good 17/09/2024 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 3
p.2
Summary of findings
Children benefit from caring relationships with staff who know them well, but their experiences and progress are inconsistent and not sustained. A recent period of instability adversely affected children’s sense of safety, emotional wellbeing and engagement in education. Managers’ decision to end one child’s time at the home has brought short-term stability but it is too early to see the long-term impact of this. Safeguarding practice is generally appropriate; however, weak management oversight, inconsistent review of incidents and the impact of police involvement reduced the effectiveness of protection for some children. The physical environment is not consistently homely due to damage and unmet maintenance needs. Leaders are committed and staffing is stable, but previous weaknesses remain and statutory requirements are unmet.
p.3
improvement to be good
Children have mixed experiences living in the home. Staff know them well, treat them with care and respect and are invested in their progress. The care children receive helps them to make progress in some areas, but this is inconsistent and not always sustained.
p.3
improvement to be good
The home experienced an unsettled period in the weeks prior to the inspection, during which there were significant challenges in relation to behaviour and the dynamics between children. These issues impacted on the day-to-day experiences of all children. One child did not feel safe and was reluctant to come out of their bedroom. Managers made the decision to end one child’s time at the home due to escalating concerns about their ability to keep them and other children safe. This was a child-centred decision, and managers carefully considered the impact on the child. They ensured the child was well supported with the move to a new home. This has had a stabilising impact on the home although it is too early to assess the long-term impact.
p.3
improvement to be good
The child who left the home had made progress in some areas, for example, they established some positive relationships with staff and were supported to receive a specialist assessment. However, the child did not make progress in other areas and there were escalating concerns about their emotional wellbeing. Concerns were shared and escalated promptly by managers. However, there was a delay in accessing specialist support and treatment that may have impacted on the child’s experience and ability to feel settled.
p.3
improvement to be good
All children experience challenges in relation to accessing education. Staff work closely with education professionals and provide structure and learning opportunities in the home where required. Effective joint working led to periods of progress for some children, such as one child accessing school after a significant period out of education. However, progress is not sustained and events in the home have impacted on children’s Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 4 ability to engage with education. Managers have recently assigned a staff member as education lead, which has had positive feedback from the education colleagues.
p.3
improvement to be good
Children’s important relationships are valued and supported in line with their care plans. Staff are flexible to ensure that arrangements for children to see family members run as smoothly as possible. They work well with the placing authority to ensure that children’s wishes are known and inform planning and support. This helps support children’s sense of identity and connection.
p.4
improvement to be good
Staff work hard to help children with their physical and emotional health. They provide guidance and encourage children to attend appointments and follow treatment plans when needed. One child who had a significant physical health difficulty resulting in hospital admission, is now engaging fully with their treatment plan and their health and self-care is much improved.
p.4
improvement to be good
Staff seek children’s wishes and feelings regularly. Through day-to-day interactions, individual time and house meetings, staff support children to exercise choice about things like activities, décor, and meals. Staff conduct good quality one to one sessions with children to provide support around various issues relevant to them such as, future plans and peer relationships. This helps children to feel valued and to approach challenges in their lives.
p.4
improvement to be good
The physical environment of the home is mixed. Children are supported to personalise and maintain their rooms and staff assist with this to promote cleanliness and safety. However, there is a significant amount of damage to the interior of the home and a need for redecoration and repair. Some unsafe items have not been removed from children’s environment. One communal area of the home is unusable for children at present. As a result, the overall environment is not homely. Managers are aware of these concerns and have begun to make improvements.
p.4
improvement to be good
Staff understand safeguarding risks and responsibilities and generally take appropriate action to protect children. They respond promptly when children go missing from home and work with external agencies to reduce risks. Effective joint working led to a significant reduction in missing episodes for one child. However, management oversight following incidents is inconsistent, and follow-up actions are not always timely or robust.
p.4
improvement to be good
Staff take a positive approach to managing behaviour. They seek to engage positively with children, to help them express feelings safely and de-escalate situations. Physical interventions are used infrequently and only when required for safety reasons. However, they are not subject to consistent, good quality management review. This results in missed opportunities to monitor practice and support staff to learn and improve interventions when children are distressed. Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 5 There have been several occasions when staff felt unable to keep children and themselves safe and called police for support. These incidents had a detrimental impact on the experiences of all children. Although staff decisions to contact police were made with children’s safety in mind, police involvement placed some children at risk of criminalisation. Three of the children were arrested following such incidents. On 2
p.4
improvement to be good
occasions when children were arrested staff did not accompany them when they were taken to the police station. They did not receive the care and support they needed and managers did not identify or address these shortfalls through effective oversight.
p.5
improvement to be good
When allegations are made or there are concerns about staff practice, managers normally take prompt, suitable action. They consult with other professionals such as the local authority designated officer when needed, consider interim safety measures and progress timely investigations. However, oversight and follow up is not always timely and thorough. Regarding one recent concern about staff practice, senior managers were not informed which meant they were unable to effectively oversee action taken.
p.5
improvement to be good
There were significant concerns about fire risks arising from incidents in the home. When these concerns arose, staff took effective action to ensure the safety for children and staff. A fire safety plan was implemented immediately. As a result, fire risks in the home significantly reduced.
p.5
improvement to be good
Concerns about online safety of two children are well understood. Staff and managers are proactive in reporting concerns and seeking the engagement of the placing local authority and police in managing risks. Staff completed individual educative work with the children to help them understand concerns and make safer decisions.
p.5
improvement to be good
Door alarms remain in use for children’s bedrooms. These are used for safeguarding reasons. Following the last inspection the manager obtained written consent from all placing authorities and completed a generic risk assessment in relation to their use. However, the need for alarms for each child is not supported by an individual assessment based on the child’s needs and their use has not been regularly reviewed.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Management arrangements have been stable since the last inspection. The manager is enthusiastic about their role, aspirational for children and has a good knowledge of their progress. However, weaknesses identified at the previous inspection have not been fully addressed and all requirements are repeated.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Managers understand the importance of effective working relationships with children’s professional networks. While there have been some challenges in this area, managers took positive action to improve the working relationship with one partner agency. Professionals provided mostly positive feedback about communication, support, and safeguarding. Some professionals and 2 parents provided constructive feedback about aspects of communication, and this was shared with managers. Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 6 Staff receive good quality individual supervision. The manager has made improvements to the completion of probationary reviews and begun to implement plans for embedding the consideration of quality standards in supervision. Improvement is still needed to ensure that all staff receive regular supervision and annual appraisal.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Staff complete a suitable range of training. Managers have effective systems in place for tracking progress with this and required qualifications. Regular team meetings are held as part of the support structure for staff. The manager arranges specialist external input in this form which is linked to the needs of children. This helps staff to be informed in their care of children.
p.6
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
The manager is open to learning and reflection and encourages this in staff. They are conducting a learning review and arranging additional support for staff following the decision to end one child’s time at the home. However, regular learning reviews as detailed in the provider’s statement of purpose have not been conducted. This represents missed opportunities to ensure that there is consistent learning from challenges.
p.6
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Notifications to Ofsted are not always timely and managers have not provided updates about the outcome of child protection investigations. This has impacted on the regulator’s oversight of safeguarding issues in the home.
p.6
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
The manager has made progress in recruitment and retention of staff. Staff say they feel well supported by managers and colleagues. They describe positive relationships across the team and a culture of mutual support and reflection which helps them to negotiate difficulties. This supports consistency of care for children and relationship building. Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 7
p.6
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.7
Requirement Due date
The quality and purpose of care standard is that children receive care from staff who—
p.7
Requirement Due date
understand the children’s home’s overall aims and the outcomes it seeks to achieve for children;
p.7
Requirement Due date
use this understanding to deliver care that meets children’s needs and supports them to fulfil their potential.
p.7
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.7
Requirement Due date
understand and apply the home’s statement of purpose;
p.7
Requirement Due date
provide personalised care that meets each child’s needs, as recorded in the child’s relevant plans, taking account of the child’s background;
p.7
Requirement Due date
help each child to understand and manage the impact of any experience of abuse or neglect;
p.7
Requirement Due date
ensure that the premises used for the purposes of the home are designed and furnished so as to—
p.7
Requirement Due date
enable each child to participate in the daily life of the home. (Regulation 6 (1)(a)(b) (2)(a)(b)(iv)(v)(c)(i)(ii))
p.7
Requirement Due date
In particular, ensure prompt attention to maintenance, repair and the removal of unsafe items.
p.7
Requirement Due date
In particular, ensure that specialist support is made available to children when they need it. 21 May 2026 Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 8 The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.7
Requirement Due date
helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and
p.8
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.8
Requirement Due date
lead and manage the home in a way that is consistent with the approach and ethos, and delivers the outcomes, set out in the home’s statement of purpose;
p.8
Requirement Due date
ensure that staff work as a team where appropriate;
p.8
Requirement Due date
ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child;
p.8
Requirement Due date
understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home;
p.8
Requirement Due date
demonstrate that practice in the home is informed and improved by taking into account and acting on—
p.8
Requirement Due date
feedback on the experiences of children, including complaints received; and
p.8
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(a)(b)(c)(f)(g)(ii)(h))
p.8
Requirement Due date
In particular, ensure consistent oversight of incidents and follow up actions, including addressing of concerns about staff practice and ensuring timely notifications to Ofsted.
p.8
Requirement Due date
In particular carry out learning reviews following incidents as described in the statement of purpose.
p.8
Requirement Due date
This requirement is restated. 9 June 2026
p.8
Requirement Due date
The registered person must prepare and implement a policy (“the behaviour management policy”) which sets out— 9 June 2026 Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 9 how appropriate behaviour is to be promoted in the children’s home; and
p.8
Requirement Due date
the measures of control, discipline and restraint which may be used in relation to children in the home.
p.9
Requirement Due date
within 48 hours of the use of the measure, the registered person, or a person who is authorised by the registered person to do so (“the authorised person”)—
p.9
Requirement Due date
has spoken to the user about the measure; and
p.9
Requirement Due date
has signed the record to confirm it is accurate. (Regulation 35(1)(a)(b) (3)(b)(i)(ii))
p.9
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that all employees—
p.9
Requirement Due date
receive practice-related supervision by a person with appropriate experience; and
p.9
Requirement Due date
have their performance and fitness to perform their roles appraised at least once every year. (Regulation 33 (4)(b)(c))
p.9
Requirement Due date
In particular, ensure that staff receive regular supervision and appraisal in line with company policy.
p.9
Requirement Due date
This requirement is restated. 9 June 2026
p.9
Requirement Due date
The registered person may only use devices for the monitoring or surveillance of children if—
p.9
Requirement Due date
the monitoring or surveillance is for the purpose of safeguarding and promoting the welfare of the child concerned, or other children;
p.9
Requirement Due date
the monitoring or surveillance is no more intrusive than necessary, having regard to the child’s need for privacy. (Regulation 24 (1)(a)(d))
p.9
Requirement Due date
In particular, ensure that the use of door alarms for children is subject to an individual risk assessment for and regularly reviewed. 9 June 2026 Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 10 This requirement is restated.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 11
p.10
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Surrey County Council
p.11
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Woodhatch Place, 11 Cockshot Hill, Reigate RH2 8EF
p.11
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Samantha Heighes
p.11
Inspector
Jacob Robson, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2756164 12 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion