Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Norto5 Kidz Academy - Lindfield
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Apr 2026
- URN verified
2561737
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 310
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 26 November 2026, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to staff: child ratios, special educational needs and information for parents and carers.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 2 April 2026, we carried out a regulatory visit and on 17 April 2026, we carried out a telephone regulatory call. We found that the provider had failed to notify Ofsted of a significant event, which is a requirement of their registration. We also found that the provider was not meeting one of the requirements. We have issued action for the provider to take.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure all designated leads for safeguarding are supported to carry out their role and responsibilities effectively, and there is a clear process for liaising with local authority safeguarding partners.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 2 May 2026, the provider responded to the action set. We found that the provider has improved their procedures so that they are in line with the local safeguarding procedures. In addition, the designated leads for safeguarding have a clear reporting pathway to enable them to carry out their roles and responsibilities effectively. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years. For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion