Early years · Early years complaint outcome
YMCA East Anton
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
30 Apr 2026
- URN verified
EY553222
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 344
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 22 January 2026, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to staff: child ratios, accident or injury, safeguarding policies and procedures and risk assessments.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 14 April 2026, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure all staff, including agency, receive induction training to help them understand their roles and responsibilities
p.1
Summary of outcome
n take all reasonable steps to ensure staff and children are not exposed to risks and be able to demonstrate how they are managing risks.
p.1
Summary of outcome
During the visit the provider notified us about matters relating to safeguarding policies and procedures. On 24 April 2026, we carried out a regulatory telephone call with the nominated individual. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider has improved their procedures for ensuring that notifications are made to Ofsted within the required timescale.
p.2
Summary of outcome
On 27 April 2026, the provider responded to the actions set at the regulatory visit. We found that the provider had improved their induction procedures for employed and agency staff. They have also reviewed and strengthened their risk assessments.
p.2
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised.
p.2
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion