Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Report card

St Andrew's CofE Primary School, Over Hulton

Inspected 24 Feb 2026 · published 6 May 2026 · URN 105236

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this frameworkSafeguarding met

Sue Dymond (lead), Mark Ward, Steven Rooney

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Achievement verified

    Needs attention

  • Attendance and behaviour verified

    Expected standard

  • Curriculum and teaching verified

    Needs attention

  • Early years verified

    Needs attention

  • Inclusion verified

    Needs attention

  • Leadership and governance verified

    Needs attention

  • Personal development and wellbeing verified

    Expected standard

  • Framework verified

    Report card

  • Inspection datesingle source

    24 Feb 2026

  • Inspectors verified

    Mark Ward, Steven Rooney, Sue Dymond

  • Postcode verified

    BL5 1EN

  • Name on report verified

    St Andrew's CofE Primary School, Over Hulton

  • Safeguarding verified

    Met

  • URN verified

    105236

Page 1 of 16
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • AchievementNeeds attention
  • Attendance and behaviourExpected
  • Curriculum and teachingNeeds attention
  • Early yearsNeeds attention
  • InclusionNeeds attention
  • Leadership and governanceNeeds attention
  • Personal development and wellbeingExpected

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−1Mixedmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisepositivefeel safepositivelyconsistentlyhigh expectationsstrengthlovesecure
Criticismweaknessesinconsistentnot consistentlynot yetgapsconcernslimitedstruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1658w−6
  • Leadership216w+9
  • Safeguarding51w−11
  • What needs to improve165w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
16
Words of findings
2,090
about usual (typical 1698)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 43
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 3
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Leadership 7%Safeguarding 2%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

St Andrew's CofE Primary School, Over Hulton

Address: Crescent Avenue, Over Hulton, Bolton, Lancashire, BL5 1EN Unique reference number (URN): 105236

p.1

Safeguarding standards met

The safeguarding standards are met. This means that leaders and/or those responsible for governance and oversight fulfil their specific responsibilities and have established an open culture in which safeguarding is everyone's responsibility and concerns are actively identified, acted upon and managed. As a result, pupils are made safer and feel safe.

p.1

How we evaluate safeguarding

When we inspect schools for safeguarding, they can have the following outcomes:

p.1

How we evaluate safeguarding

Met: The school has an open and positive culture of safeguarding. All legal requirements are met. Not met: The school has not created an open and positive culture of safeguarding. Not all legal requirements are met.

p.1

Attendance and behaviour Expected standard

Leaders know pupils well and promote high expectations for attendance and behaviour. Attendance remains a strength, with whole ‑ school attendance above national figures. Leaders act quickly and effectively where attendance is low. For example, the attendance of pupils who are on attendance contracts is improving. However, leaders do not consistently analyse patterns for groups or track trends over time. This limits their strategic planning and understanding for some pupils.

p.2

Attendance and behaviour Expected standard

Behaviour across the school is positive. Pupils conduct themselves calmly, move sensibly around school and describe feeling safe and supported. They show respect for staff and peers and understand how positive behaviour helps their learning. Pupils are confident that concerns, including bullying or discrimination, are dealt with promptly. In lessons, pupils settle quickly and show positive attitudes to learning. Staff apply expectations with reasonable consistency, although the new behaviour policy is not yet fully embedded. Where needed, staff make appropriate adjustments for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities to help them to regulate their behaviour and be able to take part in lessons. Strong relationships and pupils’ mature attitudes contribute positively to the school’s environment, although leaders’ limited analysis of behaviour information restricts their ability to evaluate impact precisely.

p.2

Personal development and wellbeing Expected standard

Leaders provide a broad and increasingly coherent programme for pupils’ personal development and wellbeing. Pupils talk confidently about the school’s values of 'hope, love, faithfulness, peace and confidence'. They give clear examples of how these guide their behaviour, relationships and decision making. Pupils show respect for people from different backgrounds, beliefs and family structures and speak positively about learning how to treat others with kindness and fairness. Through the 'Ethos Council', pupils experience democracy in action, voting on ideas and representing their classmates. This strengthens their understanding of responsibility and how communities work.

p.2

Personal development and wellbeing Expected standard

The programme for personal, social and health education, including relationships and sex education and health education, is age-appropriate and taught weekly. Pupils learn about healthy relationships, growing up, managing feelings and staying safe. Leaders enhance this through workshops, visitors and specific wellbeing resources, which give pupils a shared emotional vocabulary to improve their confidence. Pupils learn about different families, cultures and beliefs. They understand the principles that underpin life in modern Britain. Pupils enjoy a wide range of enrichment opportunities, including clubs, music tuition, cultural projects and sports, which help them develop confidence and resilience.

p.2

Personal development and wellbeing Expected standard

Enrichment to promote pupils' interests and talents is a strength. Pupils benefit from a wide range of cultural, creative and physical opportunities, including music performances, 'Spirited Arts Week', heritage projects, fencing, boccia, cross country and jujutsu. Leaders track participation to ensure disadvantaged pupils, those with special educational needs and/or disabilities and pupils who speak English as an additional language have equal access. Pupil leadership roles, such as playground leaders, reading buddies and 'salad

p.2

Needs attention

servers', help pupils develop confidence, teamwork and character. Community events and church links deepen pupils’ sense of belonging and social responsibility. As a result, pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain.

p.3

Achievement Needs attention

Pupils’ achievement is too variable across the school, reflecting weaknesses in knowledge of the basics of reading and writing for younger pupils. This is exacerbated through inconsistent curriculum implementation. Pupils' books show stronger outcomes in upper key stage 2, where clearer expectations help pupils to develop secure handwriting, greater fluency and improved stamina across their writing. This is demonstrated in the positive published outcomes in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of Year 6. However, this is not typical across the school.

p.3

Achievement Needs attention

In the early years and key stage 1, gaps in early phonics, the blending of sounds, letter formation and transcription skills slow pupils’ progress from their starting points and limit the quality of their written work. These weaknesses affect significant groups, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities, disadvantaged pupils and those who speak English as an additional language, who do not achieve consistently well across the curriculum. In several subjects, pupils struggle to recall prior learning securely, showing that knowledge is not built or retained over time. While leaders’ recent work is beginning to strengthen expectations, the overall impact on attainment and progress is not yet secure enough to ensure pupils are well prepared for their next steps.

p.3

Curriculum and teaching Needs attention

Leaders are developing the curriculum, but its design and implementation are not yet consistently effective across the school. In writing, leaders sequence learning clearly and match tasks closely to intended outcomes. As a result, pupils’ work shows early improvement. However, this stronger practice is not typical across subjects or year groups. In some wider subjects, such as art and design, leaders do not set out clearly enough how knowledge builds over time. Furthermore, staff have not received the subject ‑ specific training needed to teach the curriculum well.

p.3

Curriculum and teaching Needs attention

Teaching quality varies. Some teachers use their effective subject knowledge to explain new ideas clearly and check understanding well, but this is not consistent. In the early years and key stage 1, gaps in pupils' knowledge of early reading, phonics, handwriting, vocabulary and blending of sounds are not addressed reliably. This limits pupils’ ability to build secure understanding. Assessment systems remain underdeveloped, so teachers do not identify or act on gaps in learning quickly enough. Reasonable adjustments for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are evident in some lessons, but not routinely, meaning some pupils cannot access learning fully.

p.3

Curriculum and teaching Needs attention

Overall, leaders have begun to take steps to strengthen the curriculum and teaching quality across school. However, these improvements are at an early stage, which limits the impact that can be seen for pupils.

p.3

Early years Needs attention

The quality of provision is too inconsistent to ensure children develop the early skills they need to succeed. The curriculum is not fully developed. As a result, daily activities do not link to what children are meant to learn. Staff do not consistently model the precise language, vocabulary and early literacy skills that help children to learn well.

p.4

Early years Needs attention

Although reading is prioritised, phonics is not taught or applied with enough rigour. Several children struggle to blend sounds. Opportunities to practise phonics in the provision are limited, and misconceptions in letter formation and pencil grip often go uncorrected. Staff do not always match reading texts accurately to children’s reading ability.

p.4

Early years Needs attention

The indoor and outdoor learning environments do not support high ‑ quality learning. Staff do not use activities to build children’s language, especially outdoor activities. Weaknesses mean that children do not benefit from a confident and secure start to school life. Children are not prepared well enough for the demands of Year 1.

p.4

Early years Needs attention

Children in the early years benefit from warm relationships and calm routines. Links between staff and families make for a positive transition into school. Leadership in the early years is at an early stage of development. Although this is so, leaders understand the key priorities and have begun to address them.

p.4

Inclusion Needs attention

Leaders demonstrate a positive approach to inclusion and rightly prioritise this area. However, it is too early to see the impact of much of this work. Leaders identify the most significant groups for their context, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities, disadvantaged pupils, pupils who speak English as an additional language and children who are looked after. Pupil premium funding and collaboration with the virtual school support individual pupils. New systems, such as clearer support plans and improved tools for identifying need, are beginning to strengthen provision. However, staff confidence and expertise vary widely, so early identification and assessment remain inconsistent across the school.

p.4

Inclusion Needs attention

The school’s caring culture helps many pupils feel safe and included. Leaders engage with families, professionals and external agencies more regularly, with many parents and carers noting the positive difference in communication and support for their child in recent months. However, uneven practice and support mean staff do not reduce barriers to learning and wellbeing consistently. Where it works well, staff use helpful adjustments such as visual overlays, concrete resources or changes to the classroom layout. As a result, some pupils learn alongside their peers and achieve well. However, this support remains inconsistent and leaders do not monitor the impact of strategies well enough to assure themselves that pupils receive the support they need.

p.4

Leadership and governance Needs attention

Leaders do not have robust systems in place for monitoring and tracking key aspects of the school’s work. This limits leaders’ ability to evaluate whether actions are working or ensure that support is targeted where it is most needed. For example, information about the impact of provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is collected, but it is not analysed in enough depth to identify patterns or trends. This hinders the effectiveness of the school improvement journey to ensure support is provided as timely as it needs to be.

p.5

Leadership and governance Needs attention

The school is developing positively under new leadership. Their visibility, clear communication and relational approach are widely valued by staff, pupils, parents and carers. They have established a calm, purposeful ethos and are beginning to make a difference, particularly in curriculum development, wellbeing and community engagement. Leaders understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses and have begun to take effective action. Staff feel respected and well led. Leaders are mindful of workload and wellbeing. Professional learning is developing, including support for early career teachers, although training is not yet consistently having the impact it should.

p.5

Leadership and governance Needs attention

Governors are committed and supportive, meeting their statutory duties and beginning to offer greater challenge. However, they do not yet hold leaders fully to account for the impact of improvement work.

p.5

What it's like to be a pupil at this school

Pupils learn in a calm and orderly environment where they feel safe and ready to learn. Pupils benefit from positive relationships with staff and feel comfortable seeking help if they are worried. Pupils attend well, and most arrive punctually and settle quickly to their lessons. In subjects where examinations take place at the end of key stage 2, pupils achieve well. They take pride in their work and are keen to share what they know. Pupils benefit from rich opportunities, such as music performances, heritage projects and sporting events, which deepen their knowledge and broaden their experiences. However, pupils’ academic experiences are not yet consistent across the school.

p.5

What it's like to be a pupil at this school

Weaknesses remain in the early years and key stage 1, where phonics, blending of sounds, early writing and vocabulary development are still in the early stages of implementation. As a result, some pupils do not secure the essential skills they need to be ready for the next stage of learning. Inconsistent approaches to delivering the curriculum, including in the early years, combined with limited checking of how well pupils learn, lead to gaps in knowledge that go unaddressed. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and disadvantaged pupils do not consistently have their needs identified or receive support that matches their needs closely enough. Leaders accurately identify strengths and improvement priorities, but they do not track this progress with enough rigour. This means they cannot show the impact of much of the work that is underway to rectify the weaknesses that exist.

p.5

What it's like to be a pupil at this school

Relationships are warm and respectful, reflecting the school’s vision of 'growing in faith, hope and love'. Pupils behave well in lessons and around the school site, showing kindness and consideration towards others. They understand what bullying is, and adults act promptly and appropriately when concerns arise. Pupils feel part of a close community, where the 'Ethos Council' works with local residents and parishioners in shared events. These experiences help pupils to feel valued and connected.

p.5

Next steps

Leaders must strengthen the identification of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. They should ensure that adaptations and targeted support are implemented consistently so that pupils’ needs are met promptly and they can access learning successfully. Leaders must secure a consistent approach to the teaching of early reading, writing and knowledge of the basics across early years and key stage 1 so that pupils build the essential knowledge and fluency needed to achieve well over time. Leaders must strengthen the accuracy and use of assessment so that gaps in pupils' knowledge are identified quickly and addressed before they widen. Leaders must ensure the indoor and outdoor learning environments in the early years are purposeful and language ‑ rich so that activities consistently promote high ‑ quality learning and support children’s development of communication and early literacy.

p.6

Next steps

Leaders must establish robust systems for monitoring the actions on their school improvement plan so that leaders and governors can evaluate the impact accurately and drive sustained improvement.

p.6

About this inspection

The chair of the board of governors in this school is Revd Vincent Whitworth.

p.6

About this inspection

Inspectors carried out this full inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

About this inspection

Following our renewed inspection framework, all inspections are now led by His Majesty’s Inspectors (HMIs) or by Ofsted Inspectors (OIs) who have previously served as HMIs.

p.6

About this inspection

Inspectors spoke with school leaders, staff and members of the governing body during the inspection. They also spoke with members of the local authority and diocese.

p.6

About this inspection

The inspectors confirmed the following information about the school:

p.6

About this inspection

This school is registered as having a Church of England religious character. The most recent section 48 inspection of the school’s religious character was in June 2024.

p.6

About this inspection

The school does not make current use of any alternative provision.

p.6

About this inspection

The school has undergone significant change since the last inspection. There is a new headteacher and chair of governors in post, who were both appointed to their roles in September 2025.

p.6

Team inspectors:

Steven Rooney, Ofsted Inspector Mark Ward, Ofsted Inspector

p.7

Facts and figures used on inspection

The data was used by the inspector(s) during the inspection. More recent data may have been published since the inspection took place.

p.7

What does this mean?

The total number of pupils currently at this school and how this compares to other schools of this phase in England.

p.7

What does this mean?

The total number of pupils who can attend the school and how this compares to other schools of this phase in England.

p.7

What does this mean?

National average: 300 Headteacher : Mrs Samantha Abram

p.7

What does this mean?

The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years.

p.8

What does this mean?

The proportion of pupils with an education, health and care plan. This covers pupils with more support than is available through special educational needs support.

p.8

What does this mean?

The proportion of pupils with reported special educational support needs at the school.

p.8

What does this mean?

Based on the English Indices of Deprivation (2019) and the school's location, we have calculated whether the school is located in a more or less deprived area.

p.8

What does this mean?

Whether school has Resourced Provision or SEND unit (if applicable).

p.9

Pupils reaching the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics

The percentage of pupils meeting the expected standards in a combined reading, writing and mathematics measure.

p.9

Pupils reaching the expected standard in reading

The percentage of pupils meeting the expected standard in reading.

p.9

average

2023/24 (final) 75% 74% Close to average

p.9

Pupils reaching the expected standard in teacher-assessed writing

The percentage of pupils meeting the expected standard in teacher-assessed writing.

p.9

average

2023/24 (final) 78% 72% Close to average

p.10

Pupils reaching the expected standard in mathematics

The percentage of pupils meeting the expected standard in mathematics.

p.10

Disadvantaged pupils' performance

Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years and children looked after.

p.10

mathematics

The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics.

p.10

national average

2023/24 (final) 50% 46% Close to average

p.11

Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in reading

The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in reading.

p.11

Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in teacher-assessed writing

The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in teacher- assessed writing.

p.11

average

2023/24 (final) 50% 58% Close to average

p.11

Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in mathematics

The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in mathematics.

p.11

average

2023/24 (final) 50% 59% Close to average

p.12

average

‘S’ in the table above indicates the data has been suppressed, which is usually due to small cohorts. The suppression rules applied by the DfE when publishing the data have been mirrored and applied in the report card.

p.12

Disadvantaged pupils' performance gap

Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years and children looked after. The school disadvantage gap is the difference between the performance of the school's disadvantaged pupils compared to the performance of all non-disadvantaged pupils nationally.

p.12

mathematics

The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics, including the disadvantaged gap.

p.12

Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in reading

The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in reading and the disadvantaged gap.

p.12

Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in teacher-assessed writing

The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in teacher- assessed writing and the disadvantaged gap.

p.13

Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in mathematics

The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in mathematics and the disadvantaged gap.

p.13

gap

‘S’ in the table above indicates the data has been suppressed, which is usually due to small cohorts. The suppression rules applied by the DfE when publishing the data have been mirrored and applied in the report card.

p.14

Overall absence

The percentage of all possible mornings and afternoons missed due to absence from school (for whatever reason, whether authorised or unauthorised) across all pupils.

p.14

national average

2024/25 (2 term) 4.9% 5.2% Close to average

p.14

Persistent absence

The percentage of pupils missing 10% or more of their possible mornings and afternoons.

p.14

national average

2024/25 (2 term) 10.8% 13.3% Close to average

p.14

Exceptional

Practice is exceptional: of the highest standard nationally. Other schools can learn from it.

p.14

Strong standard

The school reaches a strong standard. Leaders are working above the standard expected of them.

p.15

Expected standard

The school is fulfilling the expected standard of education and/or care. This means they are following the standard set out in statutory and non ‑ statutory legislation and the professional standards expected of them.

p.15

Needs attention

The expected standards are not met but leaders are likely able to make the necessary improvements.

p.15

Urgent improvement

The school needs to make urgent improvements to provide the expected standard of education and/or care.

p.15

Urgent improvement

services providing education and skills for children and learners of all ages, and inspects and regulates services that care for children and young people.

p.15

Urgent improvement

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.15

Urgent improvement

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.15

Urgent improvement

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.15

Urgent improvement

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.15

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion