Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Report card

Chalmers, Dorothy Lomokwor

Inspected 9 Feb 2026 · URN EY360948

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Honufa Begum

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Framework verified

    Report card

  • Group verified

    Chalmers, Dorothy Lomokwor

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 Feb 2026

  • Inspectors verified

    Honufa Begum

  • Postcode verified

    SE1 6QE

  • Name on report verified

    Chalmers, Dorothy Lomokwor

  • URN verified

    EY360948

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisesecure knowledgeeffectivesecure
Criticismgapsdelays

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings27w0
  • Leadership234w+8
  • What needs to improve61w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
322
shorter than usual (typical 1698)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 28, typical 43
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 3
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%Leadership 33%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 55%

Full report text

Chalmers, Dorothy Lomokwor

Unique reference number (URN): EY360948 Address: 18 Bath Terrace, LONDON, SE1 6QE Type: Childminder Registered with Ofsted: 04/09/2007 Registers: EYR, CCR, VCR Registered person: Chalmers, Dorothy Lomokwor

p.1

Leadership and governance Expected standard

The childminder demonstrates secure knowledge of how she would implement a broad and balanced curriculum based on children's individual starting points. She explains how observation and assessment would inform next steps and how she would review children's progress to identify any gaps in learning. She gathers detailed information from parents during settling in and works in partnership with them to promote consistency, such as supporting toileting, communication targets and independence skills. This approach is intended to help children feel secure and make steady progress.

p.1

Leadership and governance Expected standard

The childminder uses reflection and self-evaluation to review the effectiveness of her provision. Since the previous inspection, she has adapted her planning to include more purposeful learning experiences and increased opportunities for independence and outdoor learning. For example, she embeds self-care routines and supports children to develop self- regulation skills. She maintains effective systems for safeguarding, health and safety and record-keeping. She maintains her professional knowledge through ongoing professional development and discussion with others to enhance her understanding of child development and improve her practice.

p.1

Leadership and governance Expected standard

The childminder, through discussion, demonstrates suitable knowledge and understanding of inclusive practice and early intervention. She explains how she would work in partnership with parents and external professionals to support children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. She describes how, in the past, she identified developmental delays through observation and ongoing assessment and adapted the environment to ensure children could access learning and participate meaningfully.

p.2

Compulsory Childcare Register requirements

This setting has met the requirements of the compulsory part of the Childcare Register.

p.2

Register

When we check if settings meet the Compulsory Childcare Register requirements, they can have the following outcomes:

p.2

Voluntary Childcare Register requirements

This setting has met the requirements of the voluntary part of Childcare Register.

p.2

Register

When we check if settings meet the Voluntary Childcare Register requirements, they can have the following outcomes:

p.2

Address:

Registered person: Chalmers, Dorothy Lomokwor

p.3

Address:

Operating hours: Monday,Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday,Friday : 08:00 - 09:00,Monday,Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday,Friday : 15:30 - 18:00

p.3

About this inspection

The inspector spoke with the childminder during the inspection.

p.3

About this inspection

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.3

About this inspection

There were no early years children present and/or on roll at the time of this inspection. The findings in this report are based on evidence gathered from discussions with leaders and an inspection of the premises, equipment, and any relevant documentation. When there are no early years children present, inspectors only evaluate and grade leadership and governance as there is no reliable evidence on which to assess the impact on children of other evaluation areas.

p.3

Facts and figures used on inspection

This data was available to the inspector at the time of the inspection.

p.4

Exceptional

Practice is exceptional: of the highest standard nationally. Other settings can learn from it.

p.4

Strong standard

The setting reaches a strong standard. Leaders are working above the standard expected of them.

p.4

Expected standard

The setting is fulfilling the expected standard of education and/or care. This means they are following the standard set out in statutory and non ‑ statutory legislation and the professional standards expected of them.

p.4

Needs attention

The expected standards are not met but leaders are likely able to make the necessary improvements.

p.4

Urgent improvement

The setting needs to make urgent improvements to provide the expected standard of education and/or care. services providing education and skills for children and learners of all ages, and inspects and regulates services that care for children and young people.

p.4

Urgent improvement

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Urgent improvement

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Urgent improvement

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Urgent improvement

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion