Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Care Hubz in Leeds
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Care Hubz Ltd
- Inspection date verified
11 Feb 2026
- Inspectors verified
Deirdre Silkstone
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2686872
- URN verified
2686872
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2025.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is creating written memories for the children to look back on in years to come that read as supportive, nurturing, caring and warm. p.3
- They strive to secure positive outcomes and provide a consistent model of warm, nurturing practice, which is mirrored by the staff. p.4
- This demonstrates staff’s strong focus on early de ‑ escalation, nurturing relationships and well ‑ established routines. p.4
- Staff built consistent and trusting relationships with them, which enabled them to feel emotionally safe and supported. p.3
- Behaviour management in the home is effective and rooted in positive relationships and consistent reinforcement. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development4
“Recruitment and induction processes are thorough.” p.4Parents & families3
“Feedback from family members and professionals is positive.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,102
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2686872 1 Registered provider: Care Hubz Ltd
p.1
Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home is privately operated and can provide care for one child. The child may experience social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of the inspection, one child was living in the home and they were spoken with.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager was registered in February 2026
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 18 February 2025
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2686872 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
18/02/2025 Full Good 04/07/2023 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2686872 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children living in the home experience warm, nurturing and highly individualised care. The child who has recently moved in has settled well, with staff continuing to adapt the environment and routines to meet their personality, interests and developing needs. The child who has recently moved out has made sustained, measurable progress during their time in the home. Staff built consistent and trusting relationships with them, which enabled them to feel emotionally safe and supported. These secure attachments contributed significantly to their positive progress.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff place children’s wishes and feelings at the centre of their practice. Staff routinely seek children’s views on daily routines, family time and future care planning. Children’s preferences are clearly listened to, advocated for and acted on wherever possible.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Feedback from family members and professionals is positive. Family members describe one child as happier since moving to the home and say that staff ‘are a good bunch of people’. Professionals said that the team have been a pleasure to work with and wished that all other placements were like this home.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff have effectively and sensitively supported one child to gain the necessary independence skills to support themselves in their next home. When at times the child has struggled with leaving and the uncertainty surrounding their move, staff have been able to successfully adapt their support to better meet the child’s needs. They have prioritised the child’s emotional and mental wellbeing and been their pillar of strength when times have been tough and the unknown caused high levels of anxiety. When spoken with, the child stressed that, ‘The staff are really good people.’
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The model of care of the home is becoming entrenched in staff practice. Staff are on a journey of understanding this approach and adapting their work so it is becoming part of their everyday practice. This is evidenced through the progress of the conversations with children, the home’s care documents and elements in the capturing of incident reports. Staff are getting comfortable and confident with the child-centred language. This is creating written memories for the children to look back on in years to come that read as supportive, nurturing, caring and warm.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Behaviour management in the home is effective and rooted in positive relationships and consistent reinforcement. Children contribute and engage well with the established incentive scheme, which helps them understand behavioural expectations. When children display behaviour that does not meet expectations, staff respond promptly and consistently. They offer clear, reflective guidance that helps children understand the impact of their actions, repair relationships where needed, and develop safer, more positive ways of managing their feelings. Inspection report for children’s home: 2686872 4 Safeguarding incidents involving children are infrequent. When issues do arise, staff respond with calm professionalism and a clear awareness of children’s individual needs. They maintain appropriate boundaries while offering sensitive support, which helps children feel safe and understood. This consistent approach provides predictability and
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
contributes positively to children’s emotional security.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Physical intervention has not been required for a considerable period. This demonstrates staff’s strong focus on early de ‑ escalation, nurturing relationships and well ‑ established routines. There have been no episodes of children going missing from the home, further indicating that they feel settled, well supervised and secure in their environment.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff confidently address sensitive or complex issues relating to children’s safety and wellbeing. Conversations with children are tailored to each child’s needs. They support their understanding of personal safety, coping strategies for emotions and the consequences of their actions.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
There have been no complaints or allegations. Children are aware of how to raise concerns, and staff promote an open safeguarding culture. This ensures children feel listened to and valued.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Recruitment and induction processes are thorough. New staff are appointed in line with safer recruitment procedures, ensuring their suitability to work with children. The induction programme is effective and equips staff with the skills and knowledge necessary for their roles. Staff speak positively about the induction process and report that it prepares them well for the expectations of practice in the home.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager demonstrates strong commitment to the staff team, the children and the continued development of the home. They strive to secure positive outcomes and provide a consistent model of warm, nurturing practice, which is mirrored by the staff. Effective monitoring systems are in place to identify any shortfalls and ensure that children’s needs are consistently met.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Communication between staff and external professionals is effective. The manager attends children’s meetings and advocates appropriately on their behalf. Leaders and managers challenge professional decisions when these do not reflect the children’s views, wishes and feelings and when they are negatively impacting on the children’s emotional wellbeing. This approach promotes child-centred practice and ensures that the welfare of each child remains central to care planning.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager places a strong emphasis on staff development. Supervision and appraisals focus on enhancing skills, deepening understanding of children’s needs and supporting each staff member’s professional progression. Training, diploma work and the home’s model of care are routinely embedded to strengthen staff competence and practice. Inspection report for children’s home: 2686872 5 Team meetings are purposeful and child focused. Staff discuss children’s progress, support needs and plans to move from the home in a safe and structured way. Meetings are also used to develop staff knowledge, with digital media interactive sessions supporting the ongoing embedding of the home’s model of care into everyday practice.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager does not consistently use feedback from the children to support the quality of care review. The most recent report is structured and provides an evaluation of the progress and experiences of the child. However, the lack of analysis of the child’s views places limitations on the progress that can be made. Inspection report for children’s home: 2686872 6
p.5
Recommendation
The registered person should ensure that they consult with the children when completing the quality of care review. They should analyse and evaluate the feedback to help them decide on the actions they will take to improve the quality of service delivered to the children. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 65, paragraph 15.4)
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2686872 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Thorpe House, 61 Richardshaw Lane, Stanningley, Pudsey LS28 7EL
p.7
Inspector
Deirdre Silkstone, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2686872 8 and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion