Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Report card

Childminder

Inspected 21 Nov 2025 · published 26 Feb 2026 · URN EY412978

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this frameworkSafeguarding met

Natasha Jarvis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Achievement verified

    Urgent improvement

  • Behaviour, attitudes and routines verified

    Needs attention

  • Children's welfare and wellbeing verified

    Needs attention

  • Curriculum and teaching verified

    Urgent improvement

  • Inclusion verified

    Needs attention

  • Leadership and governance verified

    Urgent improvement

  • Framework verified

    Report card

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Nov 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Natasha Jarvis

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder

  • Safeguarding verified

    Met

  • URN verified

    EY412978

Page 4 of 9
Page 4 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • AchievementUrgent improvement
  • Behaviour, attitudes and routinesNeeds attention
  • Children's welfare and wellbeingNeeds attention
  • Curriculum and teachingUrgent improvement
  • InclusionNeeds attention
  • Leadership and governanceUrgent improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−32Criticalmore positive than 5% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisefeel safesupportivegood progresshigh-qualitypositivewarmcaringsecure
Criticismnot consistentlygapspoorweaknessesnot metconcernsinconsistentnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings749w+2
  • Safeguarding51w−11
  • What needs to improve561w−67

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,361
about usual (typical 1698)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 43
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 3
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 33%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Childminder

Unique reference number (URN): EY412978 Registered with Ofsted: 17/09/2010 Registers: EYR, CCR, VCR

p.1

Safeguarding standards met

The safeguarding standards are met. This means that leaders and/or those responsible for governance and oversight fulfil their specific responsibilities and have established an open culture in which safeguarding is everyone's responsibility and concerns are actively identified, acted upon and managed. As a result, children are made safer and feel safe.

p.1

How we evaluate safeguarding

When we inspect settings for safeguarding, they can have the following outcomes:

p.2

How we evaluate safeguarding

Met: The setting has an open and positive culture of safeguarding. Not met: The setting has not created an open and positive culture of safeguarding. Not all legal requirements are met.

p.2

Behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines Needs attention

The childminder does not consider the individual needs and ages and stages of development when supporting children's understanding of their behaviour and how to manage their feelings. For example, the childminder provides inconsistent approaches to managing children's behaviour when there are minor conflicts, such as over toys. This does not help children to develop a good understanding of the expectations of their behaviour.

p.2

Behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines Needs attention

The childminder has made some improvements since the last inspection. There is now a positive environment and a warm and caring bond between the childminder and the children. The childminder has worked hard to ensure that she is now providing an emotionally supportive environment for children. She ensures that she regularly and explicitly praises children for their efforts, including for persevering when they find things tricky. For example, when they try to open the play dough containers. The childminder understands the importance of attendance and working with parents to ensure children attend regularly.

p.2

Children's welfare and wellbeing Needs attention

The childminder does not consistently teach children how to recognise, express and manage their emotions. The childminder recognises that she needs to ensure children are safe while they are eating. However, she does not demonstrate a secure understanding of the safer eating requirements in the early years statutory framework because she insists children eat their lunch in silence, which is not a requirement. The childminder does not use this as an opportunity to develop children's social or language skills.

p.2

Children's welfare and wellbeing Needs attention

The childminder has worked to ensure that there have been some improvements since the last inspection. For example, children demonstrate that they feel safe and secure in the welcoming space. They show that they have good relationships with the childminder. The childminder manages children's personal hygiene needs well and this includes ensuring children have privacy during toileting. The childminder teaches children about how to keep their teeth healthy and how drinking water keeps them healthy.

p.2

Inclusion Needs attention

The childminder's knowledge of children's needs and progress is not yet secure and she is often overambitious in her understanding of what children know and can do. This means she is not able to accurately assess any additional support that children may need. The childminder does not use additional funding to specifically support the needs of individual children. For example, she uses additional funding to fund generic costs, such as car parking and snacks. This, therefore, does not help to reduce potential barriers to children's learning. The childminder does not fully support children who speak English as an additional language as not enough consideration is given to supporting their home culture and language. The childminder explains that she knows how to seek additional advice from other professionals if she felt it was needed to reduce barriers to children's learning. She recognises that she would need to complete further training to support children with specific

p.3

Inclusion Needs attention

needs, such as special educational needs and/or disabilities, if asked to care for these children.

p.3

Achievement Urgent improvement

The childminder has a poor understanding of the children's stages of development. She is often overambitious in her expectations of children's progress. This means she does not identify where there are gaps in children's learning and does not act to reduce these gaps in development. As a result, children are not well prepared for their next stage of learning and development. For example, the childminder does not ensure specific support for children's communication and language skills as she is not accurate in her assessments of children's progress in this area.

p.3

Curriculum and teaching Urgent improvement

The childminder does not provide children with a broad curriculum that supports their individual learning needs. Her aims for learning are not clear and are not sequenced. The childminder does not have a good understanding of the quality of the curriculum and teaching. She has not taken steps following the previous inspection to meet the previous actions in regard to improving her curriculum and teaching.

p.3

Curriculum and teaching Urgent improvement

The curriculum does not prioritise children's personal, social and emotional development. For example, the childminder does not teach children how to deal with minor conflicts consistently. Although, the childminder has completed the required progress checks at age 2, these do not provide an accurate assessment of children's progress and next steps. As a result, the childminder cannot accurately tailor her teaching to children's different starting points and stages of development. The childminder does not have a clear understanding of what children know and can do and how to build on this further. The childminder does try and support children's language development through modelling vocabulary and repetition. However, she does not purposefully engage children in activities to develop their language skills. This does not support children in making good progress with their communication and language.

p.3

Curriculum and teaching Urgent improvement

The curriculum does not promote equality and diversity. For example, not enough consideration is given to children who speak English as an additional language and how to include aspects of their culture within the setting. The childminder's teaching does not consistently provide children with high-quality purposeful interactions designed to support their development. During planned interactions, the childminder is able to engage and extend children's learning. However, during child-initiated activities, the childminder reverts to intensive questioning that does not engage children in meaningful learning experiences.

p.4

Leadership and governance Urgent improvement

The childminder does not have a secure understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the setting. For example, she has not met the learning and development requirements from the last inspection and has not identified these as an area for improvement. This means children are not benefiting from an ambitious curriculum that meets their specific needs. The childminder undertakes professional development regularly through online courses. However, these are not having an impact on the childminder's practice and have not improved her teaching or understanding of the curriculum. The childminder, however, has developed her partnerships with parents to ensure a two-way flow of information.

p.4

Compulsory Childcare Register requirements

This setting has met the requirements of the compulsory part of the Childcare Register.

p.4

Register

When we check if settings meet the Compulsory Childcare Register requirements, they can have the following outcomes:

p.4

Voluntary Childcare Register requirements

This setting has met the requirements of the voluntary part of Childcare Register.

p.5

Register

When we check if settings meet the Voluntary Childcare Register requirements, they can have the following outcomes:

p.5

What it's like to be a child at this setting

There has been limited change in regard to the childminder meeting children's learning and development needs since the last inspection. Although children engage in a range of activities, these are not consistently or purposefully planned to support their learning or enjoyment. The childminder does not accurately assess children's progress as she overestimates children's abilities. This means she does not recognise and act on any gaps in children's learning and development to ensure that children receive the support they need. As a result, the childminder does not build on what children know and can do in each area of learning. Her curriculum does not offer a breadth of learning across the 7 areas of learning. The childminder does not understand how to use additional funding appropriately to meet the needs of individual children. The childminder is not consistent in her approach to managing behaviour. This means children do not understand and learn what the

p.5

What it's like to be a child at this setting

expectations for their behaviour are. The childminder does not give enough consideration to including children's home culture and language within the setting.

p.5

What it's like to be a child at this setting

There have been some improvements since the last inspection in regard to providing an emotionally supportive environment. Children demonstrate that they feel safe and secure. The childminder frequently praises children to build on their confidence, resilience and self- esteem. She encourages children to have a go when they find things difficult and praises their efforts, such as when they try to thread beads on to lace. Children develop their fine motor skills through activities, such as puzzles and playing with play dough.

p.5

Next steps

To meet the requirements of the Early years foundation stage and Childcare register the provider must take the following actions by the assigned date:

p.6

About this inspection

The inspector spoke with the childminder and children during the inspection.

p.6

About this inspection

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

About this setting

Operating hours: Monday,Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday,Friday : 07:30 - 17:00

p.7

Facts and figures used on inspection

This data was available to the inspector at the time of the inspection.

p.7

Exceptional

Practice is exceptional: of the highest standard nationally. Other settings can learn from it.

p.8

Strong standard

The setting reaches a strong standard. Leaders are working above the standard expected of them.

p.8

Expected standard

The setting is fulfilling the expected standard of education and/or care. This means they are following the standard set out in statutory and non ‑ statutory legislation and the professional standards expected of them.

p.8

Needs attention

The expected standards are not met but leaders are likely able to make the necessary improvements.

p.8

Urgent improvement

The setting needs to make urgent improvements to provide the expected standard of education and/or care.

p.8

Urgent improvement

services providing education and skills for children and learners of all ages, and inspects and regulates services that care for children and young people.

p.8

Urgent improvement

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Urgent improvement

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Urgent improvement

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Urgent improvement

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion