Summary
Kate Fripp (lead), Sara Staggs, Shazia Akram, Simon Graydon, Stephen Cattell
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Achievement verified
Urgent improvement
- Attendance and behaviour verified
Urgent improvement
- Curriculum and teaching verified
Urgent improvement
- Early years verified
Needs attention
- Inclusion verified
Urgent improvement
- Leadership and governance verified
Urgent improvement
- Personal development and wellbeing verified
Needs attention
- Framework verified
Report card
- Inspection datesingle source
4 Dec 2025
- Inspectors verified
Kate Fripp, Sara Staggs, Shazia Akram, Simon Graydon, Stephen Cattell
- Postcode verified
ME5 0HH
- Name on report verified
Wayfield Primary School
- URN verified
143909
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- AchievementUrgent improvement
- Attendance and behaviourUrgent improvement
- Curriculum and teachingUrgent improvement
- Early yearsNeeds attention
- InclusionUrgent improvement
- Leadership and governanceUrgent improvement
- Personal development and wellbeingNeeds attention
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Significant weaknesses in the school’s behaviour management procedures put pupils at risk of harm. p.2
- Pupils do not always feel safe at school. p.2
- Some staff do not feel listened to and do not feel safe to raise any concerns. p.2
- Pupils' learning is frequently disrupted by the poor behaviour of others. p.6
- Deficiencies in the design and delivery of the curriculum remain. p.6
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is reflected in the published data at the end of key stage 2. p.3
- The attainment of Year 6 pupils in reading, writing and mathematics has been below average for a number of years. p.3
- The academic outcomes for disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities have worsened over time. p.3
- Pupils' work across the curriculum shows that they are not prepared for their next steps. p.3
- They do not accumulate the knowledge and skills that they should. p.3
- Errors and misconceptions are not noticed and addressed. p.3
- Pupils do not receive the feedback that they need to help them overcome misconceptions or gaps in their learning. p.3
- Pupils do not acquire the foundational knowledge that they need in reading, writing and mathematics. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 18
- Words of findings
- 2,055
- about usual (typical 1698)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Wayfield Primary School
Address: Wayfield Road, ME5 0HH Unique reference number (URN): 143909
p.1
Safeguarding standards not met
Leaders have not ensured that there is an open and positive culture around safeguarding. They do not prioritise pupils’ safety and wellbeing. Significant weaknesses in the school’s behaviour management procedures put pupils at risk of harm.
p.2
Safeguarding standards not met
Pupils do not always feel safe at school. They sometimes feel upset and worried about how other pupils behave and how staff respond to such incidents.
p.2
Safeguarding standards not met
Staff do not have confidence in some of the school's systems. Some staff do not feel listened to and do not feel safe to raise any concerns.
p.2
Safeguarding standards not met
Leaders ensure that staff know who the school's designated safeguarding leaders are. They also liaise with other services to seek support for pupils and their families. Recruitment checks for staff are appropriate and monitored by the local governing body and trust.
p.2
How we evaluate safeguarding
When we inspect schools for safeguarding, they can have the following outcomes:
p.2
How we evaluate safeguarding
Met: The school has an open and positive culture of safeguarding. All legal requirements are met. Not met: The school has not created an open and positive culture of safeguarding. Not all legal requirements are met.
p.2
This school requires special measures
His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to provide an acceptable standard of education, and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.
p.2
Early years Needs attention
The school's early years curriculum is designed to build children's knowledge and skills and successfully prepare them for their next educational steps. However, teachers do not routinely make sure that what children already know is taken into account and built on. This is particularly the case in terms of children's language and communication. Staff do not have a sharp focus on the development of children's phonics learning and vocabulary. They recognise this issue and have recently started work to improve the quality of verbal
p.2
Urgent improvement
interactions and the way in which staff promote rich and grammatically correct language. However, this means that children in the Reception Year are not fully prepared for Year 1.
p.3
Urgent improvement
Children are happy and settled in the school's early years. They benefit from the welcoming environment and develop positive relationships with the kind staff. A reading culture is promoted through regular sharing of books. Children enjoy listening to stories and show excitement about events and characters' actions.
p.3
Urgent improvement
The provision for 2- and 3-year olds in the Nursery Year is appropriate and includes support for children's wellbeing and welfare. Families receive appropriate information when their children join the school, which allows them to understand routines and expectations. They are invited to share their children's strengths and interests so that staff get to know them and can identify any area of need quickly.
p.3
Personal development and wellbeing Needs attention
Pupils generally benefit from the school's personal development programme. However, leaders do not review the impact of the school's programme on pupils' personal development and wellbeing. They do not evaluate how well the programme supports disadvantaged pupils.
p.3
Personal development and wellbeing Needs attention
Pupils understand some of the fundamental British values, such as the concept of democracy. They know that this process allows them to have a voice in school. Pupils show pride in their elected leadership roles, such as kindness ambassadors and members of the school council. They carry out their duties with care.
p.3
Personal development and wellbeing Needs attention
Pupils are welcoming to all, including visitors to the school. They are accepting of difference and value the diversity within their school population. Pupils benefit from age-appropriate relationships education and understand the concept of consent. They know the risks associated with using the internet and how to stay safe when online.
p.3
Personal development and wellbeing Needs attention
The school offers a range of trips and extra-curricular activities. Pupils enjoy trips to a dockyard and look forward to their residential trip in Year 6. However, leaders do not have oversight of pupils' participation with this whole wider offer and experiences. This does not allow them to identify why pupils may not attend and support them to do so. This means that some pupils are not able to take part in, and benefit from, the school's wider offer to enhance their learning and promote their talents.
p.3
Achievement Urgent improvement
Pupils do not achieve well. This is reflected in the published data at the end of key stage 2. The attainment of Year 6 pupils in reading, writing and mathematics has been below average for a number of years. The academic outcomes for disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities have worsened over time. Pupils' work across the curriculum shows that they are not prepared for their next steps. They do not accumulate the knowledge and skills that they should. Errors and misconceptions are not noticed and addressed. Pupils do not receive the feedback that they need to help them overcome misconceptions or gaps in their learning.
p.3
Achievement Urgent improvement
Pupils do not acquire the foundational knowledge that they need in reading, writing and mathematics. They have a weak understanding of phonics and struggle to read and write with increasing fluency and accuracy. Many pupils struggle to read the texts they encounter across the curriculum. Pupils' writing is grammatically weak and poorly punctuated. They do not receive the feedback they need to make improvements.
p.4
Achievement Urgent improvement
Leaders' evaluation of pupils' achievement is inaccurate and is not used to shape appropriate support or identify improvement priorities.
p.4
Attendance and behaviour Urgent improvement
The school's behaviour management procedures place pupils at risk of harm. There are too many incidents where excessive and inappropriate force is used. Staff do not have the appropriate training to do this. Oversight of these procedures and the associated recording keeping is inaccurate. Pupils who experience and witness these procedures feel upset and do not feel safe.
p.4
Attendance and behaviour Urgent improvement
Pupils' behaviour in lessons is often disruptive. They show a lack of respect and disrupt the learning of others. This is not addressed well enough by leaders and teaching staff. Pupils receive 'internal suspensions', which do not benefit their learning or wellbeing and allow little opportunity for reflection. Leaders do not have clarity about how often pupils receive this sanction and its impact.
p.4
Attendance and behaviour Urgent improvement
Some pupils enjoy breaktimes and lunchtimes with their friends. Others do not find it a safe and happy time because boisterous behaviour is not addressed by staff. Pupils know that bullying is unacceptable and that they should inform staff. However, they are accepting of poor behaviour and about the lack of respect shown by some pupils.
p.4
Attendance and behaviour Urgent improvement
Leaders' work to improve attendance is not having a positive impact. Too many pupils do not attend school regularly enough and persistent absenteeism rates are increasing.
p.4
Curriculum and teaching Urgent improvement
The school has an appropriate curriculum in place. In most subjects, the curriculum has been recently reviewed to ensure that subject content is sequenced meaningfully. However, leaders do not have enough understanding about how well the curriculum is implemented. They do not ensure that the quality of teaching is effective. Necessary improvements have not been identified or acted on as a matter of urgency.
p.4
Curriculum and teaching Urgent improvement
Pupils do not receive the teaching that they need to secure their foundational knowledge in reading, writing and mathematics. The school does not prioritise the teaching of reading. Staff do not have the necessary knowledge and skills to help pupils become fluent and accurate readers. The teaching of phonics is too variable. Pupils who need additional help with their reading do not receive it in a targeted way that helps them to catch up.
p.4
Curriculum and teaching Urgent improvement
Some teachers lack the subject knowledge that they need to teach the curriculum or to adapt learning to meet pupils' needs. Disadvantaged pupils, and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, do not receive the support and adaptations they need to be able to learn and access the full curriculum.
p.5
Inclusion Urgent improvement
Leaders' inclusion procedures lack rigour and oversight. There has been some recent work to improve the processes to accurately identify pupils' needs and the barriers to their learning. However, this work is in its infancy and is not understood well by all teaching staff. Leaders' approach to inclusion does not ensure that pupils have access to the full curriculum and receive the support that they need to achieve its aims. Teachers do not have the knowledge and skills to be able to make appropriate adaptations to their teaching to meet pupils' needs.
p.5
Inclusion Urgent improvement
Some pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive appropriate extra support through targeted strategies. This includes help to develop their language and communication skills. However, this support is not systematically embedded across the curriculum, nor is it accessible for all pupils who need it. In lessons, pupils do not have appropriate resources or adult help to enable them to build on what they have gained during the targeted support sessions. Leaders' evaluation of the impact of their support strategies is weak. It does not lead to purposeful staff training and development.
p.5
Inclusion Urgent improvement
At times, pupils with SEND are not included in the whole class teaching sessions. They are not offered the support that they need to make progress through the curriculum and achieve well.
p.5
Inclusion Urgent improvement
There is a lack of oversight about how well disadvantaged pupils benefit from the pupil premium funding. Leaders do not ensure that the whole school strategy is shared with teaching staff. The processes for review and reflection on the strategy is minimal and does not allow leaders to accurately evaluate the impact of their actions.
p.5
Leadership and governance Urgent improvement
The local governing body and the trust do not have sufficient oversight about the school's work. They have not challenged leaders about their overly positive reporting about the school. Leaders have not shared information that they should with those responsible for governance. This means that record-keeping about the school's approach to behaviour management and the use of restrictive physical intervention have not been analysed in enough detail. The local governing body and trust do not fulfil their statutory duties. This includes their checks to understand the impact of the school's safeguarding procedures.
p.5
Leadership and governance Urgent improvement
Leaders do not have an accurate understanding about the school's areas for improvement. They have not acted with urgency to check the quality of the curriculum and teaching. While leaders acknowledge that pupils' achievement is poor, they have not focused on exploring the reasons behind this situation. Planned professional development and checks on curriculum implementation have been affected by their focus on managing pupils' behaviour. There is a lack of leadership capacity to recognise and bring about the improvements needed.
p.5
Leadership and governance Urgent improvement
Many staff do not feel supported in terms of their workload and wellbeing. Some staff appreciate recent changes to the expectations for their planning and marking. However, many staff raise concerns about the culture of the school and how they do not feel able to raise issues and feel listened to. Staff morale is low.
p.6
What it's like to be a pupil at this school
The school's safeguarding procedures are not effective in keeping pupils safe. Pupils' learning is frequently disrupted by the poor behaviour of others. Pupils do not routinely show respect to each other, the staff or school resources. Leaders' and staff's expectations for pupils' behaviour are inconsistent. There are too many occurrences where staff physically intervene when managing pupils' behaviour. They do not have the training and skills to do this safely. Pupils do not worry about bullying. However, some pupils do not feel safe. They are upset about the way some pupils behave and how staff respond to such incidents.
p.6
What it's like to be a pupil at this school
Pupils do not receive an acceptable standard of education. For too long, the attainment of Year 6 pupils in reading, writing and mathematics has been below the national average. Across the rest of the school, many pupils have significant gaps in their learning. They do not accumulate the knowledge and skills that they need to be successful. This means that pupils are not prepared for their next educational steps and life in modern Britain. Leaders have not acted with urgency to address this situation. Deficiencies in the design and delivery of the curriculum remain.
p.6
What it's like to be a pupil at this school
Disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities do not receive the support that they need to overcome barriers to their academic achievement. Their learning and wellbeing needs are not identified accurately or shared well enough with staff. Leaders do not ensure that disadvantaged pupils access and benefit from the school's wider opportunities, such as extra-curricular clubs.
p.6
What it's like to be a pupil at this school
Leaders continue to build relationships with families and the wider community and to promote the importance of attending school. Even so, some pupils do not attend school regularly and this affects their learning and inclusion in the school's wider opportunities. Pupils, parents and carers are greeted warmly by school staff as they enter the school site. However, a significant proportion of parents expressed dissatisfaction with the communication that they receive from the school.
p.6
Next steps
• Those responsible for governance must fulfil their statutory duties in relation to safeguarding so that they have the information they need to check on procedures and hold leaders to account for pupils' safety. • Leaders must ensure that the behaviour management procedures eradicate poor behaviour, support pupils' wellbeing and lead to pupils feeling and being safe. • Leaders must ensure that record-keeping about behaviour incidents, especially incidents linked to restrictive physical intervention, is accurate and shared with the local governing body and trust. • Leaders should ensure that they evaluate the quality of teaching to identify where improvement is needed, and then provide staff with suitable support to help them gain the subject knowledge and teaching skills that they need to deliver the curriculum well so that pupils achieve well. • Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that evaluation of the
p.7
Next steps
school's strengths and areas for improvement is evidenced by accurate information and robust analysis. • Leaders should ensure that the learning and wellbeing needs of disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities are identified accurately and that these pupils receive the support they need to thrive and succeed. • Leaders should check pupils' attendance with more rigour so that patterns and themes are identified, leading to appropriate support to reduce the barriers to regular school attendance. • Leaders should ensure that staff have the knowledge and skills that they need to teach pupils to read. • Leaders should ensure that children in the early years are supported with their language and communication through staff engaging them in high-quality interactions. • Leaders and those responsible for governance should check and evaluate the use of pupil premium funding to ensure that it benefits disadvantaged pupils.
p.7
About this inspection
This school is part of The Primary First Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Lorna Hamilton, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Steve Rumbles.
p.8
About this inspection
Inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We decided to treat the inspection a full inspection under section 5 of the same Act.
p.8
About this inspection
The inspection began on 4 December 2025 as a focused monitoring inspection. The inspection was deemed a full inspection. As a full inspection requires more time to complete than a focused monitoring inspection, we returned on 5 December 2025 to complete the full inspection. The focused monitoring inspection was carried out following a number of complaints made to Ofsted that raised serious concerns. His Majesty’s Chief Inspector decided that an inspection of the school should take place to follow up the whole school issues that were raised. Inspectors sought to establish whether pupils received appropriate support for their behaviour, wellbeing and safety.
p.8
About this inspection
Following our renewed inspection framework, all inspections are now led by His Majesty’s Inspectors (HMIs) or by Ofsted Inspectors (OIs) who have previously served as HMIs.
p.8
About this inspection
Inspectors spoke with senior school leaders and representatives from the governing body and trust during the inspection.
p.8
About this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.
p.8
About this inspection
HMCI strongly recommends that the school does not seek to appoint early career teachers. The position regarding the appointment of early career teachers will be considered again during any monitoring inspection we carry out.
p.8
About this inspection
The inspectors confirmed the following information about the school:
p.8
About this inspection
The school does not currently use any alternative provision.
p.8
Team inspectors:
Shazia Akram, His Majesty's Inspector Sara Staggs, His Majesty's Inspector Simon Graydon, His Majesty's Inspector Stephen Cattell, His Majesty's Inspector
p.9
Facts and figures used on inspection
The data was used by the inspector(s) during the inspection. More recent data may have been published since the inspection took place.
p.9
What does this mean?
The total number of pupils currently at this school and how this compares to other schools of this phase in England.
p.9
What does this mean?
The total number of pupils who can attend the school and how this compares to other schools of this phase in England.
p.9
What does this mean?
The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years.
p.10
What does this mean?
The proportion of pupils with an education, health and care plan. This covers pupils with more support than is available through special educational needs support.
p.10
What does this mean?
The proportion of pupils with reported special educational support needs at the school.
p.10
What does this mean?
Based on the English Indices of Deprivation (2019) and the school's location, we have calculated whether the school is located in a more or less deprived area.
p.10
What does this mean?
Whether school has Resourced Provision or SEND unit (if applicable).
p.11
Pupils reaching the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics
The percentage of pupils meeting the expected standards in a combined reading, writing and mathematics measure.
p.11
Pupils reaching the expected standard in reading
The percentage of pupils meeting the expected standard in reading.
p.11
Pupils reaching the expected standard in teacher-assessed writing
The percentage of pupils meeting the expected standard in teacher-assessed writing.
p.11
Pupils reaching the expected standard in mathematics
The percentage of pupils meeting the expected standard in mathematics.
p.12
Disadvantaged pupils' performance
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years and children looked after.
p.12
mathematics
The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.12
Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in reading
The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in reading.
p.13
Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in teacher-assessed writing
The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in teacher- assessed writing.
p.13
Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in mathematics
The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in mathematics.
p.13
Disadvantaged pupils' performance gap
Disadvantaged pupils are those who have been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years and children looked after. The school disadvantage gap is the difference between the performance of the school's disadvantaged pupils compared to the performance of all non-disadvantaged pupils nationally.
p.14
mathematics
The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics, including the disadvantaged gap.
p.14
Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in reading
The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in reading and the disadvantaged gap.
p.14
Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in teacher-assessed writing
The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in teacher- assessed writing and the disadvantaged gap.
p.15
Disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard in mathematics
The percentage of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected standard in mathematics and the disadvantaged gap.
p.15
Overall absence
The percentage of all possible mornings and afternoons missed due to absence from school (for whatever reason, whether authorised or unauthorised) across all pupils.
p.16
Persistent absence
The percentage of pupils missing 10% or more of their possible mornings and afternoons.
p.16
Exceptional
Practice is exceptional: of the highest standard nationally. Other schools can learn from it.
p.17
Strong standard
The school reaches a strong standard. Leaders are working above the standard expected of them.
p.17
Expected standard
The school is fulfilling the expected standard of education and/or care. This means they are following the standard set out in statutory and non ‑ statutory legislation and the professional standards expected of them.
p.17
Needs attention
The expected standards are not met but leaders are likely able to make the necessary improvements.
p.17
Urgent improvement
The school needs to make urgent improvements to provide the expected standard of education and/or care.
p.17
Urgent improvement
services providing education and skills for children and learners of all ages, and inspects and regulates services that care for children and young people.
p.17
Urgent improvement
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.17
Urgent improvement
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.17
Urgent improvement
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.17
Urgent improvement
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.17
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion