Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Achievement verified
Urgent improvement
- Behaviour, attitudes and routines verified
Urgent improvement
- Children's welfare and wellbeing verified
Urgent improvement
- Curriculum and teaching verified
Urgent improvement
- Inclusion verified
Urgent improvement
- Leadership and governance verified
Urgent improvement
- Framework verified
Report card
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Dec 2025
- Inspectors verified
Donna Birch
- Name on report verified
Childminder
- URN verified
2776771
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- AchievementUrgent improvement
- Behaviour, attitudes and routinesUrgent improvement
- Children's welfare and wellbeingUrgent improvement
- Curriculum and teachingUrgent improvement
- InclusionUrgent improvement
- Leadership and governanceUrgent improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- When children behave in ways that are unsafe or disruptive, or when they do not follow routines, the childminder does not always notice or intervene effectively. p.5
- This poor leadership places children at risk and does not support their welfare and wellbeing. p.5
- These weaknesses place children's health at risk. p.5
- This puts children at significant risk of harm. p.2
- Weaknesses in recruitment, supervision and monitoring reduce the effectiveness of safeguarding measures. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children's achievement is limited and uneven across the 7 areas of learning. p.2
- While some children engage in play and exploration, progress is largely incidental rather than meaningful. p.2
- Children have some opportunities to build their social interaction and communication when supported by familiar adults. p.2
- However, this is inconsistent and not systematically reinforced. p.2
- Early literacy and mathematical understanding is emerging in some children, but learning is not planned or sequenced effectively to build on children's prior knowledge. p.2
- Children with emerging skills do not consistently receive tailored support to help them achieve. p.2
- Children are not supported to be ready for the next stages in their learning, including being ready for formal schooling. p.2
- The childminder's lack of understanding of behaviour management means that children do not consistently develop self-regulation, independence or social skills for their ages and stages of development. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health7
“This poor leadership places children at risk and does not support their welfare and wellbeing.” p.5Leadership & governance6
“This poor oversight of ensuring suitability places children at risk.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,749
- about usual (typical 1698)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Childminder
Unique reference number (URN): 2776771 Registered with Ofsted: 08/03/2024 Registers: EYR
p.1
Safeguarding standards not met
Children are not consistently supervised and are exposed to unnecessary risk. The childminder has a limited understanding of her safeguarding responsibilities. Weaknesses in recruitment, supervision and monitoring reduce the effectiveness of safeguarding measures. The childminder demonstrates some basic child protection and safeguarding knowledge. She has also provided limited safeguarding training for some of her assistants. However, children do not consistently experience care where they are fully protected and where their welfare is promoted.
p.2
Safeguarding standards not met
Leaders have not ensured that there is an open and positive culture around safeguarding. This puts children at significant risk of harm. The childminder does not ensure that adults who work with children are suitable to do so. Required checks, including Disclosure and Barring Service checks, identity verification, references and first-aid certificates, are incomplete or unavailable. As a result, children are cared for by adults whose suitability has not been confirmed. This places children at risk.
p.2
How we evaluate safeguarding
When we inspect settings for safeguarding, they can have the following outcomes:
p.2
How we evaluate safeguarding
Met: The setting has an open and positive culture of safeguarding. Not met: The setting has not created an open and positive culture of safeguarding. Not all legal requirements are met.
p.2
Achievement Urgent improvement
Children's achievement is limited and uneven across the 7 areas of learning. While some children engage in play and exploration, progress is largely incidental rather than meaningful. Children have some opportunities to build their social interaction and communication when supported by familiar adults. However, this is inconsistent and not systematically reinforced. Early literacy and mathematical understanding is emerging in some children, but learning is not planned or sequenced effectively to build on children's prior knowledge.
p.2
Achievement Urgent improvement
Children with emerging skills do not consistently receive tailored support to help them achieve. Children are not supported to be ready for the next stages in their learning, including being ready for formal schooling.
p.2
Behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines Urgent improvement
The childminder's lack of understanding of behaviour management means that children do not consistently develop self-regulation, independence or social skills for their ages and stages of development. Children are not well supported to develop routines and to understand how to behave. For example, children are not consistently guided to sit, share or follow simple routines. This hinders children's safety and wellbeing and limits their understanding and learning to keep themselves safe.
p.2
Behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines Urgent improvement
The childminder has not set clear, age-appropriate expectations for managing children's behaviour. This means that some children do not know how to behave individually or in a group. For example, children bang their feet on radiators while sitting for snack and climb onto the windowsill. This behaviour is not challenged by the childminder or used as an opportunity to help them understand appropriate boundaries. This does not promote children's safety and wellbeing and, at times, places them at risk.
p.3
Behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines Urgent improvement
Despite these weaknesses, children do demonstrate that they feel secure in the childminder's care. For example, they seek her out for comfort when needed. The childminder does understand the importance of tackling poor attendance.
p.3
Children's welfare and wellbeing Urgent improvement
Children's welfare and wellbeing are not consistently supported to meet their individual needs. While children are familiar with the childminder and her assistants, they do not consistently provide the required attention or guidance that children need. For example, there is a lack of help when children need reassurance and support to join in activities. This does not support children in developing their self-confidence and self-esteem.
p.3
Children's welfare and wellbeing Urgent improvement
Children's physical development, personal safety and their health are not consistently managed. The childminder does not demonstrate a secure understanding of managing risks. Risk assessments are not routinely used to ensure a safe environment. For example, cleaning sprays are left within easy reach of the children. Highchairs and some play surfaces are dirty, and blind cords are left hanging where children sit to eat. This, coupled with ineffective supervision at mealtimes, places children at risk of harm. For example, the childminder does not always ensure that children are seated when eating. She allows them to wander around with food in their mouths unsupervised. Hygiene routines, such as handwashing and nappy changes, do not support children's health or help them to develop safe and healthy habits for the future.
p.3
Curriculum and teaching Urgent improvement
The childminder has a limited understanding of child development. The curriculum is not designed or sequenced to meet all children's next steps in learning. In addition, the childminder's implementation of the curriculum is weak. As such, children are not supported to develop well across all areas of learning. This narrows opportunities for children to build on their existing knowledge and skills. Assessment is not used to understand children's starting points or next steps. As a result, children do not consistently benefit from high- quality interactions that promote progress across all 7 areas of learning.
p.3
Curriculum and teaching Urgent improvement
The childminder does not adapt teaching to meet the needs of all children. Activities, such as mark making and sensory play, are generally enjoyed by the children. Interactions between adults and children often lack purpose and are more focused on supervision than on teaching. Therefore, learning is largely incidental and not meaningful to meet the unique needs of each child to help them reach their full potential. The childminder does not consistently support children's communication and language development or extend their vocabulary. For example, children consistently have dummies in their mouths and are not supported to remove them when they speak. Children have some opportunities to develop their mathematical skills as they count out and scoop pasta into bowls. Children are taken for walks every day in the local area. This supports their physical health and wellbeing.
p.3
Inclusion Urgent improvement
The childminder does not demonstrate sufficient understanding of how to promote equality and inclusion. As a result, all children do not consistently experience a setting where they feel valued, supported or able to participate fully. Children do not benefit from purposeful, inclusive practice that promotes a sense of belonging.
p.4
Inclusion Urgent improvement
Children's individual learning needs are not identified, and assessment arrangements are weak. As a result of this poor practice, children with differing abilities do not always receive the appropriate support they need. This limits their progress. The childminder has some understanding of the importance of working alongside other agencies that may be involved in children's learning and care. However, weaknesses in her own practice significantly reduce the impact of the provision to help children to be ready for later learning.
p.4
Leadership and governance Urgent improvement
The childminder, as the registered provider, does not demonstrate a clear understanding of her responsibilities. This has led to several breaches of statutory requirements. The childminder's lack of understanding of meeting requirements for suitable people and safety and risk assessment places children at risk. Additionally, key documents, including Disclosure and Barring Service checks, identity checks, references and first-aid certificates for assistants were not available for inspection as required. This poor oversight of ensuring suitability places children at risk.
p.4
Leadership and governance Urgent improvement
Oversight of the curriculum and teaching is limited. The childminder does not monitor the quality of interactions, planning or children's progress effectively. Risk assessments are incomplete, and health and safety practices, including hygiene and supervision, are inconsistently applied.
p.4
Leadership and governance Urgent improvement
The childminder does not ensure that assistants are supported, trained or supervised to carry out their roles safely and effectively. Decision-making is reactive rather than proactive, with limited use of guidance or assessment to inform improvements. As a result, children's learning, safety and welfare are not consistently protected or promoted. Leadership and governance do not currently provide a robust framework to ensure that the setting meets all statutory requirements.
p.4
What it's like to be a child at this setting
The childminder has not ensured that the required suitability checks have been completed by Ofsted for all assistants who work in her home. Additionally, poor record-keeping by the childminder means evidence that these assistants have completed a valid paediatric first-aid qualification cannot be assured at the inspection. This poor leadership places children at risk and does not support their welfare and wellbeing.
p.5
What it's like to be a child at this setting
Children do not consistently experience a safe or well-organised environment. At mealtimes, children move around while eating and are left without close supervision. This places them at risk and does not help them learn how to keep themselves safe. Babies are not always fed in a way that supports their comfort or wellbeing.
p.5
What it's like to be a child at this setting
Hygiene routines are weak. Children are not encouraged to wash their hands before eating or after having their nappy changed. The childminder does not sanitise the change mat between changes, and some equipment, such as highchairs, is not kept clean. These weaknesses place children's health at risk.
p.5
What it's like to be a child at this setting
Children's behaviour is not supported well enough. When children behave in ways that are unsafe or disruptive, or when they do not follow routines, the childminder does not always notice or intervene effectively. Children do not receive clear guidance or support to help them understand expectations or develop self-regulation.
p.5
What it's like to be a child at this setting
Children have some access to toys and activities. However, these are not planned to build on what children know or can do. The childminder does not consistently use interactions to develop children's communication or thinking. Opportunities to model language, guide play or extend learning are missed. All children do not experience a curriculum that supports them to make progress across the areas of learning.
p.5
What it's like to be a child at this setting
The childminder has procedures in place to ensure that children regularly attend.
p.5
Next steps
The provider is not meeting the requirements of the Early years foundation stage and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action.
p.5
Next steps
We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to have taken the following actions by the assigned date:
p.5
Action Completion Date
ensure that any adults do not have unsupervised access to children until Ofsted has confirmed their 12/01/2026
p.5
Action Completion Date
ensure that anyone left in sole charge of children holds a valid paediatric first-aid certificate 12/01/2026
p.6
Action Completion Date
ensure children are supervised at all times, particularly while eating, and that safe feeding practices are followed 12/01/2026
p.6
Action Completion Date
improve hygiene routines so children are supported to learn good habits and ensure all equipment used by children is hygienic and safe 12/01/2026
p.6
Action Completion Date
take steps to identify and minimise risks within the home so that children are not exposed to hazards 12/01/2026
p.6
Action Completion Date
take steps to ensure adults recognise and respond to children's behaviour appropriately 12/01/2026
p.6
Action Completion Date
ensure assistants receive effective supervision, guidance and support to improve their practice 12/01/2026
p.6
Action Completion Date
undertake professional development to gain a firm understanding of the early years foundation stage requirements and improve the quality of teaching and interactions 12/01/2026
p.6
Action Completion Date
compete and maintain required records and ensure these are accessible for inspection. 12/01/2026
p.6
Action Completion Date
To meet the requirements of the Early years foundation stage the provider must take the following actions by the assigned date:
p.6
Action Completion Date
establish and implement a curriculum that is ambitious, sequenced and tailored to children's needs, enabling them to make progress across all areas of learning 12/01/2026
p.6
Action Completion Date
implement regular and effective assessment and use this to use this to plan a challenging and enjoyable experience for each child in all areas of learning and development. 12/01/2026
p.6
About this setting
Operating hours: Monday,Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday,Sunday : 08:00 - 18:00,Friday : 08:00 - 14:00
p.7
Facts and figures used on inspection
This data was available to the inspector at the time of the inspection.
p.7
About this inspection
The inspector spoke with the childminder and her assistant.
p.7
About this inspection
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.7
About this inspection
We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.7
Exceptional
Practice is exceptional: of the highest standard nationally. Other settings can learn from it.
p.8
Strong standard
The setting reaches a strong standard. Leaders are working above the standard expected of them.
p.8
Expected standard
The setting is fulfilling the expected standard of education and/or care. This means they are following the standard set out in statutory and non ‑ statutory legislation and the professional standards expected of them.
p.8
Needs attention
The expected standards are not met but leaders are likely able to make the necessary improvements.
p.8
Urgent improvement
The setting needs to make urgent improvements to provide the expected standard of education and/or care.
p.8
Urgent improvement
services providing education and skills for children and learners of all ages, and inspects and regulates services that care for children and young people.
p.8
Urgent improvement
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Urgent improvement
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk . Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Urgent improvement
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion