Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Sky High Achievers Ashton
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
13 Nov 2025
- URN verified
2510490
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 261
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 31, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 26 September 2025, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to, supporting and understanding children's behaviour, staff: child ratios, special educational needs, safety and suitability of premises, environment and equipment and health.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 31 October 2025, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found that the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right. The provider had not ensured that their risk assessments for outdoors were effective in minimising risk to children, including children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Following a significant event, leaders took action to improve the safety of the outdoor area used by children. Risk assessments have been updated, and greater consideration has been given to better support children with special educational needs and/or disabilities during outdoor learning.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion